Adaptive health technology assessment to facilitate priority setting in low- and middle-income countries.
作者信息
Nemzoff Cassandra, Ruiz Francis, Chalkidou Kalipso, Mehndiratta Abha, Guinness Lorna, Cluzeau Francoise, Shah Hiral
机构信息
International Decision Support Initiative, Center for Global Development, London, UK
International Decision Support Initiative, Center for Global Development, London, UK.
出版信息
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004549.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Adaptive health technology assessment to facilitate priority setting in low- and middle-income countries.适应性健康技术评估，以促进低收入和中等收入国家的优先事项设定。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004549.
2
Priority setting for health in emerging markets.新兴市场的卫生重点事项设定。
J Comp Eff Res. 2013 May;2(3):283-91. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.12.
3
Criteria Used for Priority-Setting for Public Health Resource Allocation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.中低收入国家公共卫生资源分配的优先排序标准：系统评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(6):474-483. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000473. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
4
How Are New Vaccines Prioritized in Low-Income Countries? A Case Study of Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine and Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Uganda.低收入国家如何优先考虑新疫苗？以乌干达的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗和肺炎球菌结合疫苗为例。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Dec 1;6(12):707-720. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.37.
5
Introducing health technology assessment in Tanzania.引入坦桑尼亚的卫生技术评估。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Apr;36(2):80-86. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000588. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
6
[Priority setting for the health technology assessment].[卫生技术评估的优先级设定]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Jan;142 Suppl 1:S22-6. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014001300004.
7
International validation of quality indicators for evaluating priority setting in low income countries: process and key lessons.低收入国家评估优先事项设定的质量指标的国际验证：过程与关键经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2360-7.
8
Health technology assessment and its influence on health-care priority setting.卫生技术评估及其对卫生保健优先事项设定的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):1-10. doi: 10.1017/s026646230400073x.
9
The quest for a framework for sustainable and institutionalised priority-setting for health research in a low-resource setting: the case of Zambia.在资源匮乏环境下为卫生研究进行可持续且制度化的优先事项设定框架的探索：以赞比亚为例。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 17;16(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0268-7.
10
Implementing evidence-informed deliberative processes in health technology assessment: a low income country perspective.在卫生技术评估中实施循证审议程序：低收入国家的视角。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(1):29-33. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319003398. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
引用本文的文献
1
Development and implementation of a value framework for rapid health technology assessment reports: enhancing evidence-informed decision making in resource-constrained settings.快速卫生技术评估报告价值框架的制定与实施：在资源受限环境中加强循证决策
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Jul 21;41(1):e58. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325100160.
2
What can early HTA bring to needs-based innovation?早期卫生技术评估能为基于需求的创新带来什么？
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Jul 15;41(1):e46. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325100299.
3
Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force.卫生技术评估指南制定的良好实践：卫生技术评估国际组织、HTAsiaLink及药物经济学与结果研究国际协会特别工作组的报告
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Jan 6;40(1):e74. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324004719.
4
Exploring adaptive health technology assessment for evaluating 10 cancer interventions: insights and lessons from a pilot study in India.探索用于评估10种癌症干预措施的适应性健康技术评估：来自印度一项试点研究的见解与经验教训。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Jan 2. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112490.
5
A framework for improved collaboration on HTA in the Asia-Pacific region: a role for HTAsiaLink.亚太地区卫生技术评估合作的改进框架：HTAsiaLink 的作用。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 4;40(1):e43. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000588.
6
Future support on evidence-informed priority setting and situational analysis of the potential role of Health Technology Assessment in Africa to support future pandemic preparedness and response: protocol for a scoping review.未来对循证优先事项设定和非洲卫生技术评估潜在作用的情景分析的支持，以支持未来的大流行病防备和应对：范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 26;13(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02610-4.
7
An overview of the perspectives used in health economic evaluations.卫生经济评估中所使用观点概述。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 May 14;22(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00552-1.
8
Rapid cost-effectiveness analysis: hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis for patients with acute kidney injury in Rwanda.快速成本效益分析：卢旺达急性肾损伤患者的血液透析与腹膜透析对比
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Apr 30;22(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00545-0.
9
Conducting a health technology assessment in the West Bank, occupied Palestinian territory: lessons from a feasibility project.在被占领的巴勒斯坦西岸进行卫生技术评估：可行性项目的经验教训。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Feb 15;40(1):e12. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000084.
10
Validating the rigour of adaptive methods of economic evaluation.验证经济评价适应性方法的严谨性。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Sep;8(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012277.
本文引用的文献
1
Real-world data for health technology assessment for reimbursement decisions in Asia: current landscape and a way forward.亚洲用于报销决策的卫生技术评估的真实世界数据：现状与未来方向。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Oct;36(5):474-480. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000628. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
2
The transferability of health technology assessment: the European perspective with focus on central and Eastern European countries.卫生技术评估的可转移性：聚焦中东欧国家的欧洲视角
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Aug;20(4):321-330. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1779061. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Docetaxel and Paclitaxel for Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Adaptation of a Model-Based Economic Evaluation From the United Kingdom to South Africa.多西他赛和紫杉醇用于早期乳腺癌辅助治疗的成本效益：将基于模型的英国经济评估适配至南非
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 Sep;19:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 May 13.
4
Evidence-informed capacity building for setting health priorities in low- and middle-income countries: A framework and recommendations for further research.中低收入国家制定卫生优先事项的循证能力建设：进一步研究的框架与建议
F1000Res. 2017 Mar 7;6:231. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10966.1. eCollection 2017.
5
The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies.快速审查方法在卫生技术评估中的应用：3个案例研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 26;16(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0216-1.
6
Romanian Quick-HTA Development In 2013.2013年罗马尼亚快速卫生技术评估的发展
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A444. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1177. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
7
Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic.综述：迅速！迅速！迅速！……且系统。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 14;4(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-4.
8
Rapid review: an emerging approach to evidence synthesis in health technology assessment.快速综述：卫生技术评估中一种新兴的证据综合方法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Jan;30(1):20-27. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000664. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
9
Applying rapid 'de-facto' HTA in resource-limited settings: experience from Romania.在资源有限的情况下应用快速“事实上”的卫生技术评估：来自罗马尼亚的经验。
Health Policy. 2013 Oct;112(3):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
10
Transferability of health technology assessments and economic evaluations: a systematic review of approaches for assessment and application.卫生技术评估与经济评估的可转移性：评估与应用方法的系统综述
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;3:89-104. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S14404. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
Zotero 插件