• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极低能量单极技术相较于标准能量技术可减少扁桃体切除术后出血。

Very-Low Energy Monopolar Reduces Post-Tonsillectomy Hemorrhage Versus Standard Energy Techniques.

机构信息

Advanced ENT and Allergy, Louisville, Kentucky, U.S.A.

Dr Bing Zhang Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2021 Nov;131(11):2505-2511. doi: 10.1002/lary.29587. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1002/lary.29587
PMID:33904597
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To compare rates of post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage (PTH) between a very-low energy transfer monopolar technique (VLET) and standard energy techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective controlled cohort study.

METHODS

All tonsillectomies performed by practice physicians during the period January 1, 2010 to August 31, 2019 were identified. Three groups were created based on surgeon technique utilization: the study group (VLET) and two control groups (exclusive standard energy monopolar [Standard]; exclusive "hot" technique without exclusive monopolar use [Mixed "Hot"]). Each group's PTH occurrences requiring surgical intervention (PTHRSI) were identified and rates compared.

RESULTS

During the study period 11,348 tonsillectomies were performed (4,427 Standard, 1,374 VLET, 5,547 Mixed "Hot"), and 167 (1.47%) PTHRSI events identified (14 primary (<24 hours), 153 secondary (>24 hours), 12 repeat (>1PTHRSI/patient). Compared to the Standard group secondary and total PTHRSI rates (1.47%, 1.60%), the Mixed "Hot" group experienced similar rates (1.57%, P = .54; 1.68%, P = .64), but the VLET group experienced significantly lower rates (0.15%, P = .0026, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.114 [0.028-0.469]; 0.22%, P = .0016, adjusted OR 0.155 [0.048-0.494]). Age was a significant risk factor for both secondary and total PTHRSI (P = .0025, P = .0024, adjusted OR 1.02/year [1.01-1.03]). No significant difference in rate of primary PTHRSI was seen collectively or in any age group. The <12VLET Group experienced 0 episodes of secondary PTHRSI and a total PTHRSI rate of 0.09% in 1060 tonsillectomies.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard energy techniques had an adjusted odds ratio over 8-fold higher for secondary PTHRSI and over 6-fold higher for total PTHRSI compared to the minimized energy transfer VLET technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 131:2505-2511, 2021.

摘要

目的/假设:比较超低能量传输的单极技术(VLET)与标准能量技术在扁桃体切除术后出血(PTH)方面的发生率。

研究设计

回顾性对照队列研究。

方法

确定 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 8 月 31 日期间由执业医师实施的所有扁桃体切除术。根据外科医生的技术应用,将患者分为三组:研究组(VLET)和两组对照组(单独使用标准能量的单极技术[标准];不单独使用单极技术的“热”技术[混合“热”])。确定每组需要手术干预的 PTH 发生情况(PTHRSI)并比较发生率。

结果

在研究期间,共进行了 11348 例扁桃体切除术(标准组 4427 例,VLET 组 1374 例,混合“热”组 5547 例),发现 167 例(1.47%)PTHRSI 事件(14 例为原发性[<24 小时],153 例为继发性[>24 小时],12 例为重复[>1 次 PTHRSI/患者])。与标准组的继发性和总 PTHRSI 发生率(1.47%,1.60%)相比,混合“热”组的发生率相似(1.57%,P=0.54;1.68%,P=0.64),但 VLET 组的发生率显著较低(0.15%,P=0.0026,调整后的优势比[OR]0.114[0.028-0.469];0.22%,P=0.0016,调整后的 OR 0.155[0.048-0.494])。年龄是继发性和总 PTHRSI 的显著危险因素(P=0.0025,P=0.0024,调整后的 OR 每增加 1 岁为 1.02[1.01-1.03])。在任何年龄组中,均未观察到原发性 PTHRSI 的发生率有显著差异。在 1060 例扁桃体切除术中,<12VLET 组无继发性 PTHRSI 发生,总 PTHRSI 发生率为 0.09%。

结论

与最小化能量传递的 VLET 技术相比,标准能量技术的继发性 PTHRSI 和总 PTHRSI 的调整后的优势比分别高出 8 倍和 6 倍以上。

证据水平

3《喉镜》,131:2505-2511,2021。

相似文献

1
Very-Low Energy Monopolar Reduces Post-Tonsillectomy Hemorrhage Versus Standard Energy Techniques.极低能量单极技术相较于标准能量技术可减少扁桃体切除术后出血。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Nov;131(11):2505-2511. doi: 10.1002/lary.29587. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage rates: are they technique-dependent?扁桃体切除术后出血率:与技术有关吗?
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Apr;136(4 Suppl):S27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.10.022.
3
Comparison of three common tonsil surgery techniques: cold steel with hot hemostasis, monopolar and bipolar diathermy.三种常见扁桃体手术技术的比较:冷器械加热止血、单极和双极电凝。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jun;280(6):2975-2984. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07892-3. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
4
Does surgical technique influence post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage? Our experience.手术技术会影响扁桃体切除术后出血吗?我们的经验。
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2015 Jul-Aug;66(4):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2014.09.009. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
5
Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage in children: a single surgeon's experience with coblation compared to diathermy.儿童扁桃体切除术后出血:单外科医生比较等离子与电凝的经验。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jan;270(1):339-44. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2098-0. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
6
Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage: assessment of risk factors with special attention to introduction of coblation technique.扁桃体切除术后出血:危险因素评估,特别关注低温等离子射频消融技术的引入
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jul;266(7):1011-5. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0834-2. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
7
A comparison of coblation and modified monopolar tonsillectomy in adults.比较等离子与改良单极扁桃体切除术在成人中的应用。
BMC Surg. 2023 May 19;23(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02035-1.
8
Monopolar electrodissection versus cold dissection tonsillectomy among children.儿童单极电切术与冷切扁桃体切除术的比较
Saudi Med J. 2007 Oct;28(10):1525-8.
9
Return to theatre in secondary post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: a comparison of coblation and dissection techniques.扁桃体切除术后二次出血时返回手术室:比较等离子和剥离技术。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Feb;269(2):667-71. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1678-8. Epub 2011 Jun 26.
10
Hot techniques for tonsillectomy.扁桃体切除术的热门技术。
Issues Emerg Health Technol. 2006 Nov(93):1-6.