Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ann Anat. 2021 Sep;237:151743. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151743. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
The medial-to-lateral approach is favored by most colorectal surgeons for laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection and mobilisation of the left colon. The peritoneal access window, i.e. the distance between the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) must be large enough to perform the procedure safely and successfully. However, studies investigating the IMA-IMV distance and factors affecting this variable, are scarce. Therefore, we examined the IMA-IMV and D3-IMA distances to determine an anatomical framework on planning and adapting surgical therapy.
The IMA-IMV and D3-IMA distances were retrospectively measured in 230 patients (127 Male/103 Female, Median Age=54.5) who had undergone pre-operative CT-scanning before laparoscopic left-sided colorectal surgery. Two observers rated the images and interrater reliability was calculated. Subgroup, simple and multiple linear regression analyses were performed in order to detect potential interaction between morphometric variables and IMA-IMV distance.
We demonstrated a significant correlation between the inferior margin of the duodenum and the origin of IMA. Determination of the IMA-IMV distance was simple and reproducible. Approximately 45% of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal procedures had a narrow distance (≤50mm). There was a sexual dimorphism in IMA-IMV distance, being consistently large in males. There were no other pre-operative factors which predicted whether the peritoneal dissection window for a medial-to-lateral approach was sufficient.
Our results provide new data for a better understanding of metric variations in abdominal vascular structures and complement previous observations. In view of our results, we recommend pre-operative measurement of the IMA-IMV before colorectal surgery where the medial-to-lateral approach is planned. Given that a narrow distance may predict a difficult dissection, this factor should be taken into account to determine the optimal surgical approach in each patient.
大多数结直肠外科医生都喜欢采用经中线到外侧的方法进行腹腔镜后腹膜解剖和左半结肠的游离。腹膜进入窗口,即肠系膜下静脉(IMV)和肠系膜下动脉(IMA)之间的距离,必须足够大,以便安全有效地进行手术。然而,研究 IMV-IMA 距离和影响该变量的因素的研究很少。因此,我们检查了 IMA-IMA 和 D3-IMA 之间的距离,以确定规划和适应手术治疗的解剖学框架。
对 230 名(男 127 名,女 103 名,中位年龄 54.5 岁)接受腹腔镜左半结直肠手术前 CT 扫描的患者进行了回顾性测量 IMA-IMA 和 D3-IMA 之间的距离。两名观察者对图像进行评分,并计算了组内观察者间的可靠性。进行了亚组、简单和多元线性回归分析,以检测形态变量与 IMA-IMA 距离之间的潜在相互作用。
我们证明了十二指肠下界与 IMA 起源之间存在显著相关性。IMA-IMA 距离的确定简单且可重复。大约 45%的接受腹腔镜结直肠手术的患者存在狭窄的距离(≤50mm)。IMA-IMA 之间存在性别差异,男性距离始终较大。没有其他术前因素可以预测经中线到外侧的方法的腹膜解剖窗口是否足够。
我们的结果为更好地理解腹部血管结构的度量变化提供了新的数据,并补充了以前的观察结果。鉴于狭窄的距离可能预示着解剖困难,因此在计划经中线到外侧的方法的结直肠手术前,应考虑该因素。鉴于狭窄的距离可能预示着解剖困难,因此应考虑该因素以确定每位患者的最佳手术方法。