Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, 281 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Chemotherapy Center, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jun;150:168-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become one of the standard treatment options for solid tumours; however, treatment-related adverse events, including pneumonitis, sometimes disrupt the ongoing treatment. To evaluate the impact of ICI addition on the risk of pneumonitis, a meta-analysis was conducted.
Phase III randomised controlled trials comparing ICIs and conventional therapy with conventional therapy alone were selected by searching databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The odds ratio (OR) of any grade and grade III-V pneumonitis was calculated. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the incidence of pneumonitis between the treatment arm with additional ICIs and the arm with conventional therapy.
A total of 25 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) representing 16,343 patients for grade I-V and 23 RCTs with 15,006 patients for grade III-V pneumonitis were analysed. Adding ICIs was associated with a significant increase in pneumonitis (grade I-V: OR, 2.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12-3.37, grade III-V: OR, 1.83, 95% CI: 1.26-2.65). In subgroup analyses based on the mechanism of action of ICIs, cancer types (lung and non-lung cancer) and each ICI, no significant difference in heterogeneity was observed.
Adding ICIs to the conventional treatment for solid tumours significantly increased both grade I-V and grade III-V pneumonitis regardless of the mechanisms of ICIs and cancer type. These results would be helpful for oncologists to choose the appropriate treatment options using ICIs, particularly for patients with known risk factors of pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已成为实体瘤标准治疗选择之一;然而,治疗相关的不良反应,包括肺炎,有时会中断正在进行的治疗。为了评估ICI 联合治疗对肺炎风险的影响,进行了一项荟萃分析。
通过检索包括 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 在内的数据库,选择了比较 ICI 与常规治疗联合常规治疗的 III 期随机对照试验。计算任何等级和 III-V 级肺炎的优势比(OR)。进行荟萃分析以比较附加 ICI 的治疗组与常规治疗组之间肺炎的发生率。
共分析了 25 项随机对照试验(RCT),代表了 16343 例 I-V 级和 23 项 RCT 中有 15006 例 III-V 级肺炎患者。添加 ICI 与肺炎显著增加相关(I-V 级:OR,2.67,95%置信区间[CI]:2.12-3.37,III-V 级:OR,1.83,95%CI:1.26-2.65)。基于 ICI 的作用机制、癌症类型(肺癌和非肺癌)和每种 ICI 的亚组分析中,未观察到异质性有显著差异。
将 ICI 添加到实体瘤的常规治疗中,无论 ICI 的作用机制和癌症类型如何,都会显著增加 I-V 级和 III-V 级肺炎的发生。这些结果将有助于肿瘤学家选择使用 ICI 的适当治疗方案,特别是对于已知有肺炎或间质性肺病风险因素的患者。