Beldhuis Iris E, Marapin Ramesh S, Jiang You Yuan, Simões de Souza Nádia F, Georgiou Artemis, Kaufmann Thomas, Castela Forte José, van der Horst Iwan C C
Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
J Crit Care. 2021 Aug;64:144-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Cognitive biases and factors affecting decision making in critical care can potentially lead to life-threatening errors. We aimed to examine the existing evidence on the influence of cognitive biases and factors on decision making in critical care.
We conducted a scoping review by searching MEDLINE for articles from 2004 to November 2020. We included studies conducted in physicians that described cognitive biases or factors associated with decision making. During the study process we decided on the method to summarize the evidence, and based on the obtained studies a descriptive summary of findings was the best fit.
Thirty heterogenous studies were included. Four main biases or factors were observed, e.g. cognitive biases, personal factors, environmental factors, and patient factors. Six (20%) studies reported biases associated with decision making comprising omission-, status quo-, implicit-, explicit-, outcome-, and overconfidence bias. Nineteen (63%) studies described personal factors, twenty-two (73%) studies described environmental factors, and sixteen (53%) studies described patient factors.
The current evidence on cognitive biases and factors is heterogenous, but shows they influence clinical decision. Future studies should investigate the prevalence of cognitive biases and factors in clinical practice and their impact on clinical outcomes.
重症监护中的认知偏差和影响决策的因素可能会导致危及生命的错误。我们旨在研究关于认知偏差和因素对重症监护决策影响的现有证据。
我们通过检索MEDLINE获取2004年至2020年11月的文章进行了一项范围综述。我们纳入了针对医生开展的描述与决策相关的认知偏差或因素的研究。在研究过程中,我们确定了总结证据的方法,基于所获得的研究,发现的描述性总结最为合适。
纳入了30项异质性研究。观察到四个主要偏差或因素,即认知偏差、个人因素、环境因素和患者因素。六项(20%)研究报告了与决策相关的偏差,包括遗漏偏差、现状偏差、内隐偏差、外显偏差、结果偏差和过度自信偏差。19项(63%)研究描述了个人因素,22项(73%)研究描述了环境因素,16项(53%)研究描述了患者因素。
关于认知偏差和因素的现有证据是异质性的,但表明它们会影响临床决策。未来的研究应调查认知偏差和因素在临床实践中的流行情况及其对临床结果的影响。