Suppr超能文献

临床决策中的认知偏差及其对急诊科患者结局的影响:范围综述。

Cognitive bias during clinical decision-making and its influence on patient outcomes in the emergency department: A scoping review.

机构信息

Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Neurology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):7076-7085. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16845. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An integral part of clinical practice is decision-making. Yet there is widespread acceptance that there is evidence of cognitive bias within clinical practice among nurses and physicians. However, how cognitive bias among emergency nurses and physicians' decision-making influences patient outcomes remains unclear.

AIM

The aim of this review was to systematically synthesise research exploring the emergency nurses' and physicians' cognitive bias in decision-making and its influence on patient outcomes.

METHODS

This scoping review was guided by the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. The databases searched included CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science and PubMed. No date limits were applied. The Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendation (PAGER) framework was used to guide the discussion.

RESULTS

The review included 18 articles, consisting of 10 primary studies (nine quantitative and one qualitative) and eight literature reviews. Of the 18 articles, nine investigated physicians, five articles examined nurses, and four both physicians and nurses with sample sizes ranging from 13 to 3547. Six primary studies were cross-sectional and five used hypothetical scenarios, and one real-world assessment. Three were experimental studies. Twenty-nine cognitive biases were identified with Implicit bias (n = 12) most frequently explored, followed by outcome bias (n = 4). Results were inconclusive regarding the influence of biases on treatment decisions and patient outcomes. Four key themes were identified; (i) cognitive biases among emergency clinicians; (ii) measurement of cognitive bias; (iii) influence of cognitive bias on clinical decision-making; and (iv) association between emergency clinicians' cognitive bias and patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified that cognitive biases were present among emergency nurses and physicians during clinical decision-making, but it remains unclear how cognitive bias influences patient outcomes. Further research examining emergency clinicians' cognitive bias is required.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Awareness of emergency clinicians' own cognitive biases may result to the provision of equity in care.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION IN THIS REVIEW

We intend to disseminate the results through publication in a peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

摘要

背景

临床实践的一个重要组成部分是决策。然而,人们普遍认为,护士和医生在临床实践中存在认知偏差。然而,急诊护士和医生的决策中的认知偏差如何影响患者的结局尚不清楚。

目的

本综述的目的是系统地综合研究探索急诊护士和医生在决策中的认知偏差及其对患者结局的影响。

方法

本综述遵循 PRISMA 扩展用于范围综述。检索的数据库包括 CINAHL、MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 PubMed。未应用日期限制。使用模式、进展、差距、实践证据和研究建议 (PAGER) 框架指导讨论。

结果

综述包括 18 篇文章,其中包括 10 篇原始研究(9 项定量研究和 1 项定性研究)和 8 篇文献综述。18 篇文章中,有 9 篇研究医生,5 篇研究护士,4 篇同时研究医生和护士,样本量从 13 到 3547 不等。6 项原始研究为横断面研究,5 项使用假设情景,1 项使用真实世界评估。三项为实验研究。确定了 29 种认知偏差,其中隐性偏见(n=12)最常被研究,其次是结果偏见(n=4)。关于偏见对治疗决策和患者结局的影响,结果尚无定论。确定了四个关键主题;(i)急诊临床医生中的认知偏见;(ii)认知偏见的测量;(iii)认知偏见对临床决策的影响;(iv)急诊临床医生的认知偏见与患者结局的关系。

结论

本综述表明,在临床决策过程中,急诊护士和医生存在认知偏差,但尚不清楚认知偏差如何影响患者结局。需要进一步研究急诊临床医生的认知偏差。

临床相关性

对急诊临床医生自身认知偏见的认识可能会导致提供公平的护理。

本综述中无患者或公众参与

我们打算通过在同行评议的期刊上发表和会议报告来传播研究结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验