Sapienza University of Rome.
J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul 4;161(4):477-491. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1900046. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
What mitigates prejudice against migrants in situations of uncertainty? Addressing this question, we explored how individuals with greater COVID-19 concern perceive migrants as a greater threat and show prejudice against them, indirectly through the mechanism of need for cognitive closure and binding moral foundations.This study was conducted in two European countries: Malta and Italy. Six hundred and seventy-six individuals participated in this quantitative study (Malta: N = 204; Italy N = 472). Results from this study showed that the need for cognitive closure and binding moral foundations mediate the relationship between COVID-19 concern and prejudice against migrants in both countries. When testing the three binding moral foundations (loyalty, authority, and purity), the authority foundation seems to be the most consistent predictor.The implications of the findings contribute to theories about how situational uncertainty caused by COVID-19, together with the need for epistemic certainty and binding morality, contribute to increased prejudiced attitudes against migrants.
在不确定的情况下,是什么减轻了对移民的偏见?为了解决这个问题,我们探讨了对 COVID-19 关注度更高的人如何将移民视为更大的威胁,并通过对认知封闭和道德基础的需求的间接机制表现出对他们的偏见。这项研究在两个欧洲国家进行:马耳他和意大利。共有 676 人参加了这项定量研究(马耳他:N = 204;意大利 N = 472)。研究结果表明,在这两个国家,认知封闭的需求和道德基础的结合都在 COVID-19 关注度和对移民的偏见之间起到了中介作用。在测试三个绑定的道德基础(忠诚、权威和纯洁)时,权威基础似乎是最一致的预测因素。研究结果的意义有助于解释理论,即 COVID-19 引起的情境不确定性,以及对认知确定性和道德基础的需求,如何导致对移民的偏见态度增加。