• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理想文化严谨性的道德基础。

The Moral Foundations of Desired Cultural Tightness.

作者信息

Di Santo Daniela, Gelfand Michele J, Baldner Conrad, Pierro Antonio

机构信息

Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 19;13:739579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.739579. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.739579
PMID:35519640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9062776/
Abstract

People vary on their desire for strict norms, and the moral underpinnings of these differences have yet to be explored. The current research examined whether and how moral beliefs held by individuals would affect the extent to which they want their country to be tight (i.e., having strict social norms) or loose (i.e., having more permissive social norms). In particular, the effects of the "binding" and "individualizing" foundations, which are moral beliefs focused on the importance of groups and individuals, respectively, were examined. We hypothesized that the binding foundations could predict people's desire for cultural tightness. We also hypothesized that the perception that one's society is threatened may drive this effect. Three studies were conducted using both cross-sectional (Studies 1 and 3) and two-wave (Study 2) designs. Demographic variables and participants' political orientation effects were controlled. In Study 1, only the binding foundations significantly predicted higher desired tightness. In Study 2, binding foundations predicted desired tightness measured at follow-up. In Study 3, the positive effect of perceived threat on desired tightness the binding foundations was confirmed. From additional within-paper analyses we also have some evidence of significant relationships, albeit unstable across studies, between desired tightness and individualizing foundations.

摘要

人们对严格规范的渴望各不相同,而这些差异背后的道德基础尚待探索。当前的研究考察了个体持有的道德信念是否以及如何影响他们希望自己的国家是严谨的(即拥有严格的社会规范)还是宽松的(即拥有更宽容的社会规范)程度。具体而言,研究考察了“约束性”和“个体化”基础的影响,这两种道德信念分别侧重于群体和个体的重要性。我们假设约束性基础能够预测人们对文化严谨性的渴望。我们还假设,认为自己的社会受到威胁的认知可能会推动这种影响。研究采用了横断面研究(研究1和研究3)和两波研究(研究2)设计。控制了人口统计学变量和参与者的政治倾向影响。在研究1中,只有约束性基础显著预测了更高的期望严谨性。在研究2中,约束性基础预测了随访时测得的期望严谨性。在研究3中,证实了感知到的威胁对期望严谨性与约束性基础之间的积极影响。从论文中的其他分析中,我们也有一些证据表明,期望严谨性与个体化基础之间存在显著关系,尽管这些关系在不同研究中并不稳定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e8/9062776/fcf95c7c508a/fpsyg-13-739579-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e8/9062776/a63435b9affe/fpsyg-13-739579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e8/9062776/fcf95c7c508a/fpsyg-13-739579-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e8/9062776/a63435b9affe/fpsyg-13-739579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e8/9062776/fcf95c7c508a/fpsyg-13-739579-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Moral Foundations of Desired Cultural Tightness.理想文化严谨性的道德基础。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 19;13:739579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.739579. eCollection 2022.
2
Moral foundations theory, political identity, and the depiction of morality in children's movies.道德基础理论、政治认同与儿童电影中的道德描绘。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 26;16(3):e0248928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248928. eCollection 2021.
3
Economic and Social Political Ideology and Homophobia: The Mediating Role of Binding and Individualizing Moral Foundations.经济社会政治意识形态与恐同:结合与个体化道德基础的中介作用。
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 May;47(4):1183-1194. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-0989-2. Epub 2017 May 2.
4
Prevention regulatory focus, desired cultural tightness, civic moral disengagement, and emotional reactions to normative daily transgressions: a serial mediation model among adults in Italy.预防监管焦点、期望的文化紧密性、公民道德脱离以及对规范性日常违规行为的情绪反应:意大利成年人中的一个系列中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 9;15:1340152. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1340152. eCollection 2024.
5
Moral foundations are better predictors of belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories than the Big Five personality traits.道德基础比大五人格特质更能预测对新冠病毒阴谋论的相信程度。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 24;14:1201695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1201695. eCollection 2023.
6
Moral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relations.道德价值观、社会意识形态与基于威胁的认知:对群体间关系的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 6;13:869121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869121. eCollection 2022.
7
Moving Morality Beyond the In-Group: Liberals and Conservatives Show Differences on Group-Framed Moral Foundations and These Differences Mediate the Relationships to Perceived Bias and Threat.超越内群体的道德观念:自由主义者和保守主义者在群体框架下的道德基础上存在差异,且这些差异调节了与感知到的偏见和威胁之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 21;12:579908. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579908. eCollection 2021.
8
Tight cultures and vengeful gods: How culture shapes religious belief.紧密的文化和复仇的神:文化如何塑造宗教信仰。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Oct;150(10):2057-2077. doi: 10.1037/xge0001033. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
9
Political orientation, moral foundations, and COVID-19 social distancing.政治倾向、道德基础与新冠疫情社交隔离
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0267136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267136. eCollection 2022.
10
Seeing beyond political affiliations: The mediating role of perceived moral foundations on the partisan similarity-liking effect.超越政治党派偏见:感知道德基础在党派相似性偏好效应中的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 29;13(8):e0202101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202101. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
The Pathway between Social Dominance Orientation and Drop out from Hierarchy-Attenuating Contexts: The Role of Moral Foundations and Person-Environment Misfit.社会支配取向与从等级制度弱化情境中退出之间的路径:道德基础和人境失配的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;13(9):712. doi: 10.3390/bs13090712.
2
Addressing the effect of concern with COVID-19 threat on prejudice towards immigrants: The sequential mediating role of need for cognitive closure and desire for cultural tightness.论对新冠疫情威胁的担忧对移民偏见的影响:认知闭合需求和文化紧密性渴望的序列中介作用
Int J Intercult Relat. 2023 Mar;93:101755. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101755. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
3

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and prejudice against migrants: the mediating roles of need for cognitive closure and binding moral foundations. A comparative study.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)与对移民的偏见:认知封闭需求和约束性道德基础的中介作用。一项比较研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul 4;161(4):477-491. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1900046. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire.重新分析道德基础问卷的因素结构。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct;60(4):1303-1329. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12452. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
3
Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries.
I don't care why you do it, just don't! Reactions to negative and positive organizational deviance partly depend on the desire for tightness of prevention-focused employees.
我不在乎你为什么这么做,就是别这么做!对消极和积极的组织越轨行为的反应,部分取决于预防型员工对严格控制的渴望。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 6;13:951852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951852. eCollection 2022.
67 个国家的道德判断中的性别差异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Oct 28;287(1937):20201201. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1201. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice.偏见的全球分布背后的生态和文化因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0221953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221953. eCollection 2019.
5
The Strength of Social Norms Across Human Groups.社会规范在人类群体中的力量。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;12(5):800-809. doi: 10.1177/1745691617708631.
6
Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach.为什么保守派比自由派更具惩罚性?一种道德基础方法。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Jun;41(3):258-272. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000232. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
7
Morality.道德
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x.
8
Tightness-looseness across the 50 united states.50 个州的紧松度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 3;111(22):7990-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317937111. Epub 2014 May 19.
9
Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study.紧密文化和松散文化的差异:一项 33 国研究。
Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1100-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1197754.
10
Mapping the moral domain.绘制道德领域图谱。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Aug;101(2):366-85. doi: 10.1037/a0021847.