Allen-Mersh T G, Thomson J P
Department of Surgery, St. Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
Br J Surg. 1988 May;75(5):416-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750507.
One hundred and twenty-three patients (M:F, 0.9:1; mean age 62 years) underwent 156 operations between 1954 and 1984 for correction of late colostomy complications (stenosis 65 patients, prolapse 16 patients, paracolostomy hernia 42 patients). Sixty-three per cent of patients eventually had a good result but in some up to 5 operations were necessary. Local excision of scar tissue at the mucocutaneous junction was associated with a 61 per cent (43/71) success rate for relief of colostomy stenosis. Where local fixation failed to prevent recurrent colostomy prolapse (13/20, 65 per cent of local fixation operations), colectomy and ileostomy was the most effective second procedure (2/3, 67 per cent success rate). Where local repair of a paracolostomy hernia failed (15/32, 47 per cent of local operations), resiting of the stoma to the umbilicus or right side of the abdomen produced better results (3/7, 43 per cent success rate) than resiting to another trephine on the left side of the abdomen (2/14, 14 per cent success rate).
1954年至1984年间,123例患者(男:女为0.9:1;平均年龄62岁)接受了156次手术,以纠正晚期结肠造口并发症(65例狭窄、16例脱垂、42例结肠造口旁疝)。63%的患者最终取得了良好效果,但有些患者需要进行多达5次手术。在黏膜皮肤交界处局部切除瘢痕组织,缓解结肠造口狭窄的成功率为61%(43/71)。若局部固定未能防止结肠造口脱垂复发(13/20,占局部固定手术的65%),结肠切除术和回肠造口术是最有效的第二步手术(2/3,成功率67%)。若结肠造口旁疝局部修补失败(15/32,占局部手术的47%),将造口重新安置至脐部或腹部右侧比重新安置至腹部左侧的另一钻孔处效果更好(3/7,成功率43%对比2/14,成功率14%)。