• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

藏毛窦切除术:一期中线缝合加与不加封闭切口负压治疗的对比

Pilonidal Cyst Excision: Primary Midline Closure with versus without Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy.

作者信息

Gabor Silvio, de Lima Favaro Murillo, Pimentel Pedroso Ruy Francisco, Duarte Bárbara Henriqueta Ferreira, Novo Rafaela, Iamarino Ana Paula, Ribeiro Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle

机构信息

Clínica Silvio Gabor de Gastroenterologia, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of General Surgery, Santo Amaro University, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Mar 23;9(3):e3473. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003473. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000003473
PMID:33907657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8062152/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pilonidal cysts are a painful condition that primarily affect young adult men. In the literature, numerous operative techniques for resolving pilonidal cysts are described, with variable outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare primarily closed midline incisions managed with or without the use of closed incision negative pressure therapy after pilonidal cyst excision.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients underwent excision and midline primary closure. Postoperative care composed of closed incisional negative pressure therapy (study group; n = 10) or gauze dressings (control group; n = 11). In both groups, the sutures were partially removed on day 14 and completely removed on day 21. Compared outcomes included the duration of hospitalization, pain on the day of surgical procedure, and on postoperative day 7, and time-to-healing.

RESULTS

The median hospital stay was about 9 hours and 23 hours in the study and control groups, respectively ( < 0.05). The median pain scores on the day of operation were 1.20/10 in the study group and 3.36/10 in the control group ( < 0.05). On day 7, study group showed median pain score 0.9/10 and control group showed 2.63/10 ( < 0.05). The mean healing time was 23.8 and 57.9 days in the ciNPT group and gauze group, respectively ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These outcomes supported the incorporation of closed incision negative pressure therapy into our surgical treatment protocol for pilonidal cysts.

摘要

背景

藏毛囊肿是一种主要影响年轻成年男性的疼痛性疾病。文献中描述了多种用于解决藏毛囊肿的手术技术,其结果各不相同。本研究的目的是比较藏毛囊肿切除术后采用或不采用闭合切口负压疗法处理的中线闭合切口。

方法

21例患者接受了切除及中线一期缝合。术后护理包括闭合切口负压疗法(研究组;n = 10)或纱布敷料(对照组;n = 11)。两组均在第14天部分拆除缝线,第21天完全拆除缝线。比较的结果包括住院时间、手术当天及术后第7天的疼痛情况以及愈合时间。

结果

研究组和对照组的中位住院时间分别约为9小时和23小时(<0.05)。手术当天研究组的中位疼痛评分为1.20/10,对照组为3.36/10(<0.05)。第7天,研究组中位疼痛评分为0.9/10,对照组为2.63/10(<0.05)。闭合切口负压疗法组和纱布组的平均愈合时间分别为23.8天和57.9天(<0.05)。

结论

这些结果支持将闭合切口负压疗法纳入我们的藏毛囊肿手术治疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/13a8da1ef711/gox-9-e3473-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/e86efa609c54/gox-9-e3473-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/f9e803b21cc5/gox-9-e3473-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/7a13c2803aef/gox-9-e3473-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/91da5453a95a/gox-9-e3473-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/10a6e09a53c3/gox-9-e3473-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/647695d27a63/gox-9-e3473-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/6bac64517bbe/gox-9-e3473-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/e9253bd24fd0/gox-9-e3473-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/ac93bb5252a1/gox-9-e3473-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/13a8da1ef711/gox-9-e3473-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/e86efa609c54/gox-9-e3473-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/f9e803b21cc5/gox-9-e3473-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/7a13c2803aef/gox-9-e3473-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/91da5453a95a/gox-9-e3473-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/10a6e09a53c3/gox-9-e3473-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/647695d27a63/gox-9-e3473-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/6bac64517bbe/gox-9-e3473-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/e9253bd24fd0/gox-9-e3473-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/ac93bb5252a1/gox-9-e3473-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b5/8062152/13a8da1ef711/gox-9-e3473-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Pilonidal Cyst Excision: Primary Midline Closure with versus without Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy.藏毛窦切除术:一期中线缝合加与不加封闭切口负压治疗的对比
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Mar 23;9(3):e3473. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003473. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.藏毛窦手术治疗后一期愈合与二期愈合的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub2.
3
Experience with pilonidal disease in children.儿童肛门部藏毛窦疾病的诊治经验。
J Surg Res. 2011 Sep;170(1):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.02.016. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
4
Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy after Bascom's cleft lift surgery for pilonidal sinus disease: A randomized study comparing healing.藏毛窦疾病行巴斯科姆氏裂创提升术后的闭合切口负压伤口治疗:一项比较愈合情况的随机研究
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Oct 6;27(1). doi: 10.1111/codi.17198.
5
Evaluation of closed incision negative pressure therapy systems on the closure of incisional space model.封闭切口负压治疗系统对切口间隙模型闭合情况的评估
J Wound Care. 2019 Dec 2;28(12):850-860. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.12.850.
6
[Primary midline closure after excision of a pilonidal sinus is associated with a high recurrence rate].藏毛窦切除术后一期中线缝合与高复发率相关。
Chirurg. 2003 May;74(5):461-8. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0616-8.
7
The use of negative-pressure wound therapy in pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard open wound care after surgical excision.负压伤口治疗在藏毛窦疾病中的应用:一项随机对照试验,比较手术切除后负压伤口治疗与标准开放伤口护理的效果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Dec;57(12):1406-11. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000240.
8
Simple and effective surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus: asymmetric excision and primary closure using suction drain and subcuticular skin closure.藏毛窦的简单有效手术治疗:不对称切除并使用引流管和皮下皮肤缝合进行一期缝合。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 May;43(5):701-6; discussion 706-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02235591.
9
Inverse 'D' incision technique in treatment of pilonidal sinus disease; excision with minimal tissue loss, closure without tension and lateral location of the suture line.倒“D”形切口技术治疗藏毛窦疾病;切除时组织损失最小,无张力缝合,缝线位于外侧。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Nov;97(5):261-265. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.5.261. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
10
Secondary healing versus midline closure and modified Bascom natal cleft lift for pilonidal sinus disease.二期愈合与中线缝合和改良 Bascom 鼻内裂提升术治疗藏毛窦病的比较。
Scand J Surg. 2011;100(2):110-3. doi: 10.1177/145749691110000208.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the Impact of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Healing in Patients Post Excision of Pilonidal Sinus? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.负压伤口治疗对藏毛窦切除术后患者伤口愈合有何影响?一项系统评价与Meta分析
Int Wound J. 2025 May;22(5):e70194. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70194.
2
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Versus Standard of Care Over Closed Plastic Surgery Incisions in the Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.闭合切口负压疗法与整形外科闭合手术切口护理标准在减少手术部位并发症方面的比较:一项比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eplasty. 2023 Mar 31;23:e22. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Surgical-site Infections: A Randomized Trial.负压伤口疗法治疗手术部位感染:一项随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jun;269(6):1034-1040. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003056.
2
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pilonidal Disease.美国结肠和直肠外科医师协会关于藏毛疾病管理的临床实践指南。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb;62(2):146-157. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001237.
3
Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials Evaluating a Single-Use Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy System.
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy versus Standard of Care in Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
闭合切口负压疗法与标准治疗在减少手术部位并发症方面的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Mar 16;11(3):e4722. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004722. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Meta 分析比较试验评估一种一次性使用闭合切口负压治疗系统。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1S Management of Surgical Incisions Utilizing Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy):41S-46S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005312.
4
Use of Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Infection: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.使用封闭式切口负压伤口治疗在高感染风险的翻修全髋关节和膝关节置换术后患者中的应用:一项前瞻性、随机临床试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Mar;34(3):554-559.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
5
Excision with primary midline closure compared with Limberg flap in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a randomised clinical trial.与Limberg皮瓣术相比,一期中线缝合切除术治疗骶尾部藏毛疾病的随机临床试验
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Jan;101(1):21-29. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0144. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
6
A randomized clinical trial evaluating negative pressure therapy to decrease vascular groin incision complications.一项评估负压疗法以减少腹股沟血管切口并发症的随机临床试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Dec;68(6):1744-1752. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.224. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
7
High Rate of Major Morbidity after Surgical Excision for Pilonidal Disease.藏毛窦疾病手术切除后严重并发症的高发生率。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Aug/Sep;19(6):603-607. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.020. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
8
Management of pilonidal disease.藏毛窦疾病的管理。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2018 Jun;30(3):411-416. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000628.
9
Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.常见的手术治疗藏毛窦疾病:荟萃分析、合并数据分析和复发的综合研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 15;8(1):3058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20143-4.
10
German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease.德国藏毛窦疾病管理国家指南。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Aug;401(5):599-609. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1463-7. Epub 2016 Jun 16.