Ophthalmology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Immunology, Ophthalmology and ORL, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;259(9):2771-2781. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05213-0. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of Kahook Dual Blade ab interno trabeculectomy combined with phacoemulsification compared to stand-alone conventional cataract surgery.
A single-center longitudinal, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients older than 18 years with coexisting cataract and open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were invited to participate. Preoperative and postoperative clinical data were collected and analyzed preoperatively and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after the procedure. Main outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, number of glaucoma medications, endothelial cell count, and standard automated perimetry.
Forty-two eyes from 33 patients were randomly allocated to the combined cataract and KDB (treatment, n = 21) or cataract alone (control, n = 21) groups. Intraocular pressure decreased from 17.9 ± 3.5 to 16.0 ± 2.2 mmHg and from 17.3 ± 2.5 to 15 ± 3.2 mmHg at the last visit in the treatment and control groups (p = 0.47). The use of glaucoma medications was reduced from a median (IQR) 1 (1-2) to 0 (0-0) in the treatment group and from 1 (1-2) to 0 (0-1) in the control group, with no significant differences between groups at the 12-month visit (p = 0.47). Best corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell count, and standard automated perimetry remained similar during follow-up in both groups.
In patients with well-controlled, mild-to-moderate glaucoma, adding ab interno trabeculectomy with KDB to phacoemulsification might not be more effective than phacoemulsification alone to reach mid-teens IOP values. Both procedures showed similar safety profiles.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04202562, December 17, 2019 retrospectively registered.
评估 Kahook Dual Blade 经内路小梁切开术联合超声乳化白内障吸除术与单纯常规白内障手术相比的疗效和安全性。
进行了一项单中心纵向随机对照试验。邀请年龄大于 18 岁且合并白内障和开角型青光眼或高眼压的患者参加。收集并分析术前和术后的临床数据,并在术后 1、3、6 和 12 个月进行分析。主要观察指标包括最佳矫正视力、眼压、青光眼药物数量、内皮细胞计数和标准自动视野计。
33 名患者的 42 只眼被随机分配至联合白内障和 KDB(治疗组,n = 21)或单纯白内障(对照组,n = 21)组。治疗组眼压从 17.9 ± 3.5 降至 16.0 ± 2.2mmHg,对照组从 17.3 ± 2.5 降至 15 ± 3.2mmHg,在最后一次随访时两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.47)。治疗组从中位数(IQR)1(1-2)降至 0(0-0),对照组从 1(1-2)降至 0(0-1),两组在 12 个月随访时差异无统计学意义(p = 0.47)。两组在随访期间最佳矫正视力、内皮细胞计数和标准自动视野计均相似。
在控制良好、轻度至中度青光眼患者中,与单纯超声乳化白内障吸除术相比,联合 Kahook Dual Blade 经内路小梁切开术可能无法更有效地达到青少年中期的眼压值。两种手术均具有相似的安全性。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04202562,2019 年 12 月 17 日回顾性注册。