Suppr超能文献

在真实环境下,75 岁及以上男性中铥激光前列腺汽化切除术与经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术的比较:倾向评分分析。

Comparison between thulium laser vapoenucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in men aged 75 years and older in a real-life setting: a propensity score analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, IRCCS INRCA, Via della Montagnola 83, 60127, Ancona, Italy.

Geriatric Pharmacoepidemiology Lab, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jun;33(6):1757-1763. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01868-1. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urologists may hesitate to offer transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) because of increased morbidity in elderly patients.

AIMS

We aimed to compare data on postoperative outcomes of elderly men undergoing bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) as compared to thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery. Differences between interventions were estimated using propensity scores (PS) to adjust for different patients characteristics.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2020, 275 men were included in the analysis. Propensity score retrieved 65 patients in each group. Median age was 78 (4) years in B-TURP group and 78 (6) in ThuVEP group. Median prostate volume was 63 (35) ml and 54 (24) ml in B-TURP group and ThuVEP group, respectively. Only American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in ThuVEP group (p = 0.006). Median operation time, catheterization time, and hospital stay were similar in both groups (55 min, 2 and 3 days). Overall, 84.6% of men had no complications, with no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.234). Only one patient in B-TURP group experienced a Clavien grade IIIb complication. By 1 year, there were a statistically significant differences in International Prostate Symptom Score (p = 0.000) in favor of B-TURP group and in maximal urine flow rate (p = 0.000) in favor of ThuVEP group.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Both procedures showed excellent functional improvements one year after surgery with a low rate of major complications in men aged ≥ 75 years with small-to-medium sized prostates.

摘要

背景

由于老年患者发病率增加,泌尿科医生可能会犹豫是否进行经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)。

目的

我们旨在比较行双极经尿道前列腺切除术(B-TURP)与铥激光前列腺汽化切除术(ThuVEP)的老年男性术后结果数据。

方法

我们回顾性分析了所有年龄≥75 岁行良性前列腺增生手术的患者数据。使用倾向评分(PS)估计干预措施之间的差异,以调整不同患者特征。

结果

2017 年至 2020 年间,共有 275 名男性纳入分析。倾向评分在每组中检索到 65 名患者。B-TURP 组的中位年龄为 78(4)岁,ThuVEP 组为 78(6)岁。B-TURP 组和 ThuVEP 组的中位前列腺体积分别为 63(35)ml 和 54(24)ml。仅 ThuVEP 组的美国麻醉医师协会评分显著更高(p=0.006)。两组的手术时间、导尿管留置时间和住院时间相似(55 分钟,2 天和 3 天)。总体而言,84.6%的男性没有并发症,两组之间无显著差异(p=0.234)。B-TURP 组仅有 1 例发生 Clavien Ⅲb 级并发症。1 年后,B-TURP 组的国际前列腺症状评分(p=0.000)和 ThuVEP 组的最大尿流率(p=0.000)有统计学显著差异。

讨论和结论

两种手术方法在年龄≥75 岁、前列腺体积较小至中等的男性中,术后 1 年均显示出出色的功能改善,且严重并发症发生率低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验