• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在真实环境下,75 岁及以上男性中铥激光前列腺汽化切除术与经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术的比较:倾向评分分析。

Comparison between thulium laser vapoenucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in men aged 75 years and older in a real-life setting: a propensity score analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, IRCCS INRCA, Via della Montagnola 83, 60127, Ancona, Italy.

Geriatric Pharmacoepidemiology Lab, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jun;33(6):1757-1763. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01868-1. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1007/s40520-021-01868-1
PMID:33907993
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urologists may hesitate to offer transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) because of increased morbidity in elderly patients.

AIMS

We aimed to compare data on postoperative outcomes of elderly men undergoing bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) as compared to thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery. Differences between interventions were estimated using propensity scores (PS) to adjust for different patients characteristics.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2020, 275 men were included in the analysis. Propensity score retrieved 65 patients in each group. Median age was 78 (4) years in B-TURP group and 78 (6) in ThuVEP group. Median prostate volume was 63 (35) ml and 54 (24) ml in B-TURP group and ThuVEP group, respectively. Only American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in ThuVEP group (p = 0.006). Median operation time, catheterization time, and hospital stay were similar in both groups (55 min, 2 and 3 days). Overall, 84.6% of men had no complications, with no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.234). Only one patient in B-TURP group experienced a Clavien grade IIIb complication. By 1 year, there were a statistically significant differences in International Prostate Symptom Score (p = 0.000) in favor of B-TURP group and in maximal urine flow rate (p = 0.000) in favor of ThuVEP group.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Both procedures showed excellent functional improvements one year after surgery with a low rate of major complications in men aged ≥ 75 years with small-to-medium sized prostates.

摘要

背景

由于老年患者发病率增加,泌尿科医生可能会犹豫是否进行经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)。

目的

我们旨在比较行双极经尿道前列腺切除术(B-TURP)与铥激光前列腺汽化切除术(ThuVEP)的老年男性术后结果数据。

方法

我们回顾性分析了所有年龄≥75 岁行良性前列腺增生手术的患者数据。使用倾向评分(PS)估计干预措施之间的差异,以调整不同患者特征。

结果

2017 年至 2020 年间,共有 275 名男性纳入分析。倾向评分在每组中检索到 65 名患者。B-TURP 组的中位年龄为 78(4)岁,ThuVEP 组为 78(6)岁。B-TURP 组和 ThuVEP 组的中位前列腺体积分别为 63(35)ml 和 54(24)ml。仅 ThuVEP 组的美国麻醉医师协会评分显著更高(p=0.006)。两组的手术时间、导尿管留置时间和住院时间相似(55 分钟,2 天和 3 天)。总体而言,84.6%的男性没有并发症,两组之间无显著差异(p=0.234)。B-TURP 组仅有 1 例发生 Clavien Ⅲb 级并发症。1 年后,B-TURP 组的国际前列腺症状评分(p=0.000)和 ThuVEP 组的最大尿流率(p=0.000)有统计学显著差异。

讨论和结论

两种手术方法在年龄≥75 岁、前列腺体积较小至中等的男性中,术后 1 年均显示出出色的功能改善,且严重并发症发生率低。

相似文献

1
Comparison between thulium laser vapoenucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in men aged 75 years and older in a real-life setting: a propensity score analysis.在真实环境下,75 岁及以上男性中铥激光前列腺汽化切除术与经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术的比较:倾向评分分析。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jun;33(6):1757-1763. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01868-1. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
2
[Comparison of efficacy and safety of transurethral thulium laser vapoenucleation of prostate and transurethral thulium laser enucleation of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].经尿道铥激光前列腺汽化剜除术与经尿道铥激光前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效与安全性比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 15;103(30):2297-2301. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20221203-02563.
3
Vapoenucleation of the prostate using a high-power thulium laser: a one-year follow-up study.使用高功率铥激光进行前列腺汽化核化:一项为期一年的随访研究。
BMC Urol. 2015 May 9;15:40. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0032-7.
4
A randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of thulium laser transurethral vaporesection of the prostate (ThuVARP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the National Health Service (NHS) - the UNBLOCS trial: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项随机对照试验,旨在确定在国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中,铥激光经尿道前列腺汽化切除术(ThuVARP)与经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)的临床效果和成本效益——UNBLOCS试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Apr 17;18(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1916-5.
5
Comparison Between Thulium Laser VapoEnucleation and GreenLight Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate in Real-Life Setting: Propensity Score Analysis.现实环境中铥激光汽化剜除术与绿激光选择性前列腺汽化术的比较:倾向评分分析
Urology. 2018 Nov;121:147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
6
Thulium laser VapoResection of the prostate versus traditional transurethral resection of the prostate or transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.钬激光前列腺汽化切除术与传统经尿道前列腺电切术或经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺梗阻的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1355-1364. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2287-6. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
7
Is thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate equally safe and effective in elderly patients? A propensity score matched analysis of early perioperative and functional outcomes.钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗高龄患者的安全性和有效性:一项基于倾向评分匹配的早期围手术期和功能结局分析。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Dec;45(10):648-655. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2020.09.011. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
8
A comparative study of thulium laser resection of the prostate and bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia.经尿道铥激光前列腺切除术与双极经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的对比研究。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):633-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11610.x. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
9
[Comparative observation of thulium laser resection of the prostate-tangerine technique and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia of various sizes].[铥激光前列腺切除术-橘子技术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗不同大小良性前列腺增生的对比观察]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 12;99(6):423-427. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.06.008.
10
Complications and early postoperative outcome in 1080 patients after thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate: results at a single institution.1080 例铥激光前列腺汽化切除术患者的并发症和早期术后结果:单中心研究结果。
Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):859-67. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.048. Epub 2012 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional Outcome and Safety of Endoscopic Treatment Options for Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) in Patients ≥ 75 Years of Age.75岁及以上良性前列腺梗阻(BPO)患者内镜治疗方案的功能结局与安全性
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 8;13(6):1561. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061561.
2
Clinical efficacy and complications of transurethral resection of the prostate versus plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate.经尿道前列腺电切术与等离子前列腺剜除术的临床疗效及并发症比较。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Feb 18;28(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-00989-9.
3
Efficacy and safety profile of GreenLight laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate in ≥ 75 years old patients: results from the Italian GreenLight Laser Study Group.

本文引用的文献

1
Reprint - Bipolar vs. monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction: A Cochrane review.转载 - 双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺梗阻继发下尿路症状:Cochrane系统评价
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Dec;14(12):423-430. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6464.
2
State of the Art of Thulium Laser Enucleation and Vapoenucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review.钬激光前列腺剜除术和前列腺汽化切除术的现状:系统评价。
Urology. 2020 Feb;136:19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.022. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
Are Outcomes of Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Different in Men Aged 75 and Over? A Propensity Score Analysis.
75岁及以上患者中前列腺绿激光选择性汽化术的疗效和安全性:来自意大利绿激光研究小组的结果
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Apr;35(4):877-885. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02351-9. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
4
Therapeutic Effect Analysis of Plasma Bipolar Intelligent Electrotonic for Cystostomy in the Treatment of Senile Prostatic Hyperplasia.经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗高龄前列腺增生症的疗效分析。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Oct 15;2021:9332848. doi: 10.1155/2021/9332848. eCollection 2021.
75 岁及以上男性行钬激光前列腺剜除术的疗效是否不同?倾向评分分析。
Urology. 2019 Oct;132:170-176. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
4
Anatomical Control of Adenoma Technique: An Accurate Surgical Approach to Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.腺瘤技术的解剖学控制:一种准确的前列腺铥激光剜除术手术方法。
Urology. 2018 Mar;113:252. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.037. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
5
Thulium laser enucleation (ThuLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate in saline (TURis): A randomized prospective trial to compare intra and early postoperative outcomes.铥激光剜除术(ThuLEP)与经尿道前列腺盐水切除术(TURis):一项比较术中及术后早期结果的随机前瞻性试验。
Actas Urol Esp. 2017 Jun;41(5):309-315. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2016.06.010. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
6
Comparison of thulium laser enucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in a randomized prospective trial with 5-year follow-up.一项为期5年随访的随机前瞻性试验中,铥激光剜除术与前列腺等离子动力切除术的比较。
Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Dec;31(9):1797-1802. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2052-2. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
7
The Epidemiology of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Associated with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Prevalence and Incident Rates.与下尿路症状相关的良性前列腺增生症的流行病学:患病率和发病率
Urol Clin North Am. 2016 Aug;43(3):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.04.001.
8
Prospective assessment of perioperative course in 2648 patients after surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction.对2648例良性前列腺梗阻手术治疗患者围手术期过程的前瞻性评估。
World J Urol. 2017 Feb;35(2):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1866-7. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
9
Congestive Heart Failure.充血性心力衰竭
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2015 Aug;33(3):553-62. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in urological practice: ICUD/AUA review paper.泌尿外科抗凝和抗血小板治疗:ICUD/AUA 综述论文。
J Urol. 2014 Oct;192(4):1026-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.103. Epub 2014 May 21.