• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

噪声暴露史个体的听阈切迹的意义:系统评价。

The Significance of Audiometric Notching in Individuals With a History of Noise Exposure: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1109-1118. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001034.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001034
PMID:33908409
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is reliant on the appraisal of audiometric data. A notch, dip or bulge, centered at the 4-kHz frequency is considered to be pathognomonic. However, guidelines applied to assist the diagnosis of NIHL often allow for a notch centered between the 3- and 6-kHz frequencies. The primary outcome of this review is to document the relationship between audiometric notching at particular frequencies and the populations in which they have been identified.

DESIGN

We included all population-based studies, cohort, cross-sectional, case-control, case-series, and case reports of adults and children, with exposure to noise and with a notch, dip or bulge. The review has been registered with Prospero (Registration: CRD42017079901) and prepared in line with the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

We included 84 articles in the final systematic review. There were a total of 1,438,987 individuals, aged 7 to 80 years old. The studies were conducted in 26 different countries. Fourteen studies identified notching at 3 kHz, 63 studies identified notching at 4 kHz, and 47 studies identified notching at 6 kHz. The Newcastle-Ottawa risk assessment tool was performed on 82 of the studies emphasizing the high risk of bias in observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The overwhelming outcome of this systematic review demonstrates that the relationship between noise exposure and a 3- to 6-kHz audiometric notch is not straight-forward. A handful of articles have displayed a clear association between an individual's noise exposure and an audiometric notch. Unilateral notches, notches observed at 3 kHz and notches in the absence of continued high-intensity noise exposure must be scrutinized thoroughly. The ambiguous nature of NIHL directs its continued interest.

摘要

目的

噪声性听力损失(NIHL)的诊断依赖于听力数据的评估。在 4 kHz 频率处出现的凹口、凹陷或凸起被认为是具有特征性的。然而,用于协助诊断 NIHL 的指南通常允许在 3 至 6 kHz 频率之间出现凹口。本综述的主要结果是记录特定频率处的听力图凹陷与已确定的人群之间的关系。

设计

我们纳入了所有基于人群的研究、队列研究、横断面研究、病例对照研究、病例系列研究和成人及儿童噪声暴露病例报告,这些报告均有凹口、凹陷或凸起。该综述已在 Prospero 注册(注册号:CRD42017079901),并按照 PRISMA 指南进行准备。

结果

我们最终的系统综述共纳入 84 篇文章。共有 1438987 人,年龄 7 至 80 岁。这些研究在 26 个不同的国家进行。14 项研究在 3 kHz 处发现凹陷,63 项研究在 4 kHz 处发现凹陷,47 项研究在 6 kHz 处发现凹陷。对 82 项研究进行了纽卡斯尔-渥太华风险评估工具评估,强调观察性研究存在高偏倚风险。

结论

本系统综述的压倒性结果表明,噪声暴露与 3 至 6 kHz 听力图凹陷之间的关系并不简单。少数几篇文章显示出个体噪声暴露与听力图凹陷之间存在明确的关联。必须仔细审查单侧凹陷、在 3 kHz 处观察到的凹陷以及在没有持续高强度噪声暴露的情况下出现的凹陷。NIHL 的模糊性质使其持续受到关注。

相似文献

1
The Significance of Audiometric Notching in Individuals With a History of Noise Exposure: A Systematic Review.噪声暴露史个体的听阈切迹的意义:系统评价。
Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1109-1118. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001034.
2
Determinants of bilateral audiometric notches in noise-induced hearing loss.噪声性听力损失双侧听阈差的决定因素。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Apr;123(4):1005-10. doi: 10.1002/lary.23686.
3
Audiometric notch as a sign of noise induced hearing loss.听力计切迹作为噪声性听力损失的一个体征。
Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jan;58(1):46-51. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.1.46.
4
The prevalence of notched audiograms in a cross-sectional study of 12,055 railway workers.在一项对12055名铁路工人的横断面研究中,切迹型听力图的患病率。
Ear Hear. 2015 May-Jun;36(3):e86-92. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000129.
5
Occupational noise exposure, hearing loss, and notched audiograms in the HUNT Nord-Trøndelag hearing loss study, 1996-1998.1996 - 1998年HUNT北特伦德拉格听力损失研究中的职业噪声暴露、听力损失与切迹听力图
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jun;127(6):1442-1450. doi: 10.1002/lary.26256. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
6
Longitudinal threshold changes in older men with audiometric notches.听力出现切迹的老年男性的纵向阈值变化
Hear Res. 2000 Mar;141(1-2):220-8. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00223-3.
7
High frequency audiometric notch: an outpatient clinic survey.高频听阈切迹:一项门诊调查。
Int J Audiol. 2010 Feb;49(2):95-8. doi: 10.3109/14992020903300423.
8
Hearing threshold levels of Australian coal mine workers: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 64196 audiograms.澳大利亚煤矿工人的听力阈值水平:64196 份听力图的回顾性横断面研究。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Oct;60(10):808-819. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1884908. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
9
Sensitivity of Methods for Diagnosing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Cases of Exposures Including Intense Low-Frequency Noise.诊断包括高强度低频噪声暴露在内的噪声性听力损失病例的方法的灵敏度。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241240353. doi: 10.1177/23312165241240353.
10
Determinants of the Audiometric Notch at 4000 and 6000 Hz in Young Adults.年轻人 4000 和 6000 Hz 听阈切迹的决定因素。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):371-383. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19030. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Consideration of health inequity in systematic reviews and primary studies on risk factors for hearing loss.在关于听力损失风险因素的系统评价和原始研究中对健康不平等的考量。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Apr 3;2(4):e12052. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12052. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Easy as 1-2-3: Development and Evaluation of a Simple yet Valid Audiogram-Classification System.易如1-2-3:一种简单而有效的听力图分类系统的开发与评估
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241260041. doi: 10.1177/23312165241260041.