Suppr超能文献

黏膜类天疱疮的诊断策略评估。

Assessment of Diagnostic Strategy for Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid.

机构信息

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Dermatology, Center of Blistering Diseases, European Reference Network-Skin Member, the Netherlands.

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pathology, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Jul 1;157(7):780-787. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1036.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

An accurate diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is essential to reduce diagnostic and therapeutic delay.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of direct immunofluorescence microscopy on mucosal biopsy specimens and immunoserology in a large cohort of patients with suspected MMP.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was carried out in a single tertiary care center for blistering diseases between January 2002 and March 2019. Eligible participants were patients with suspected MMP and paired data on at least a mucosal biopsy specimen for direct immunofluorescence microscopy (DIF) and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy (IIF) on a human salt-split skin substrate (SSS). In addition, an optional DIF test on a skin biopsy specimen and one or more performed routine immunoserologic tests were analyzed. Data analysis was conducted from April 2019, to June 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Diagnostic accuracy of DIF, IIF SSS, and immunoblot for BP180 and BP230.

RESULTS

Of the 787 participants, 121 (15.4%) received the diagnosis of MMP (50 men [41.3%], 71 women [58.7%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 60.1 [17.7] years). Sixty-seven of the patients with MMP (55.4%) had monosite involvement, of which oral site was the most frequently affected (51 [42.1%]). No significant difference was found between the sensitivity of DIF on a perilesional buccal biopsy and a normal buccal biopsy (89.3% vs 76.7%). Three patients with solitary ocular involvement showed a positive DIF of only the oral mucosa. In 6 patients with a negative mucosal DIF, a skin biopsy confirmed diagnosis of MMP. Overall, IIF SSS was less sensitive (44.6%), but highly specific (98.9%). The sensitivity of immunoblot (66.1%) was higher compared to SSS, but with lower specificity (91.3%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This comparative diagnostic accuracy study of a cohort of 787 patients found a high sensitivity of a mucosal DIF biopsy for diagnosis of MMP, and lower sensitivity of serologic analysis. A biopsy can be taken from either perilesional or normal buccal mucosa. An additional DIF biopsy of another mucosal site or of affected or unaffected skin may increase the diagnostic yield and is recommended in patients with negative DIF results and high clinical suspicion.

摘要

重要性

黏膜类天疱疮 (MMP) 的准确诊断对于减少诊断和治疗的延误至关重要。

目的

评估直接免疫荧光显微镜检查在大样本疑似 MMP 患者的黏膜活检标本和免疫血清学中的诊断准确性。

设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究于 2002 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月在一家专门治疗水疱病的三级护理中心进行。合格的参与者是疑似 MMP 的患者,并且至少有一份黏膜活检标本进行直接免疫荧光显微镜检查 (DIF) 和间接免疫荧光显微镜检查 (IIF) 在人盐分裂皮肤底物 (SSS) 上。此外,还分析了可选的皮肤活检 DIF 测试和一项或多项常规免疫血清学测试。数据分析于 2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 6 月进行。

主要结果和措施

DIF、IIF SSS 和 BP180 和 BP230 免疫印迹的诊断准确性。

结果

在 787 名参与者中,有 121 名 (15.4%) 被诊断为 MMP (50 名男性 [41.3%],71 名女性 [58.7%];诊断时的平均 [SD] 年龄为 60.1 [17.7] 岁)。67 例 MMP 患者 (55.4%) 为单部位受累,其中口腔部位最常受累 (51 [42.1%])。黏膜 DIF 在病变周围颊部活检和正常颊部活检中的敏感性无显著差异 (89.3% vs 76.7%)。3 例单纯眼部受累患者仅口腔黏膜 DIF 阳性。在 6 例黏膜 DIF 阴性的患者中,皮肤活检证实 MMP 诊断。总体而言,IIF SSS 的敏感性较低 (44.6%),但特异性较高 (98.9%)。免疫印迹 (66.1%) 的敏感性高于 SSS,但特异性较低 (91.3%)。

结论和相关性

这项对 787 例患者队列的比较诊断准确性研究发现,黏膜 DIF 活检对 MMP 的诊断具有较高的敏感性,而血清学分析的敏感性较低。可以从病变周围或正常颊黏膜取活检。对另一个黏膜部位或受影响或不受影响的皮肤进行额外的 DIF 活检可能会提高诊断率,建议对 DIF 结果阴性且临床高度怀疑的患者进行。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Diagnostic Strategy for Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid.黏膜类天疱疮的诊断策略评估。
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Jul 1;157(7):780-787. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1036.
10
Anti-BP180-type mucous membrane pemphigoid: report of two cases.抗BP180型黏膜类天疱疮:两例报告。
Odontology. 2016 Jan;104(1):114-8. doi: 10.1007/s10266-014-0181-2. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

5
[Skin fragility in autoimmune blistering diseases of the skin].[皮肤自身免疫性水疱病中的皮肤脆性]
Dermatologie (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;75(12):924-933. doi: 10.1007/s00105-024-05428-2. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
7
State-of-the-art diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases.自身免疫性水疱病的最新诊断方法。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jun 6;15:1363032. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1363032. eCollection 2024.
8
Diagnostic Techniques in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases.自身免疫性疱病的诊断技术。
Br J Biomed Sci. 2023 Nov 24;80:11809. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2023.11809. eCollection 2023.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验