• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养老院居民中侵袭性较小的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2)诊断样本比较-阿肯色州,2020 年 6 月至 8 月。

A Comparison of Less Invasive Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Diagnostic Specimens in Nursing Home Residents-Arkansas, June-August 2020.

机构信息

COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(Suppl 1):S58-S64. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab310.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciab310
PMID:33909063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8135387/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing remains essential for early identification and clinical management of cases. We compared the diagnostic performance of 3 specimen types for characterizing SARS-CoV-2 in infected nursing home residents.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 17 residents were enrolled within 15 days of first positive SARS-CoV-2 result by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and prospectively followed for 42 days. Anterior nasal swabs (AN), oropharyngeal swabs (OP), and saliva specimens (SA) were collected on the day of enrollment, every 3 days for the first 21 days, and then weekly for 21 days. Specimens were tested for presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using RT-PCR and replication-competent virus by viral culture.

RESULTS

Comparing the 3 specimen types collected from each participant at each time point, the concordance of paired RT-PCR results ranged from 80% to 88%. After the first positive result, SA and OP were RT-PCR-positive for ≤48 days; AN were RT-PCR-positive for ≤33 days. AN had the highest percentage of RT-PCR-positive results (21/26 [81%]) when collected ≤10 days of participants' first positive result. Eleven specimens were positive by viral culture: 9 AN collected ≤19 days following first positive result and 2 OP collected ≤5 days following first positive result.

CONCLUSIONS

AN, OP, and SA were effective methods for repeated testing in this population. More AN than OP were positive by viral culture. SA and OP remained RT-PCR-positive longer than AN, which could lead to unnecessary interventions if RT-PCR detection occurred after viral shedding has likely ceased.

摘要

背景

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)检测对于早期识别和临床管理病例仍然至关重要。我们比较了 3 种标本类型在感染疗养院居民中鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断性能。

方法

在实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)首次检测到 SARS-CoV-2 阳性结果后的 15 天内,对 17 名居民进行了便利抽样,并前瞻性随访了 42 天。在入组当天、前 21 天每 3 天以及随后的 21 天内每周采集前鼻拭子(AN)、咽拭子(OP)和唾液标本(SA)。使用 RT-PCR 检测标本中 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 的存在,并用病毒培养检测有复制能力的病毒。

结果

比较每个参与者在每个时间点采集的 3 种标本类型,配对 RT-PCR 结果的一致性为 80%至 88%。在首次阳性结果后,SA 和 OP 的 RT-PCR 阳性结果持续时间≤48 天;AN 的 RT-PCR 阳性结果持续时间≤33 天。在参与者首次阳性结果≤10 天采集的 21 份 AN 中,RT-PCR 阳性结果的百分比最高(21/26 [81%])。11 份标本通过病毒培养呈阳性:9 份 AN 是在首次阳性结果后≤19 天采集的,2 份 OP 是在首次阳性结果后≤5 天采集的。

结论

AN、OP 和 SA 是该人群重复检测的有效方法。通过病毒培养,AN 比 OP 阳性的更多。SA 和 OP 的 RT-PCR 阳性持续时间长于 AN,如果 RT-PCR 检测发生在病毒脱落可能已经停止后,可能会导致不必要的干预。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Less Invasive Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Diagnostic Specimens in Nursing Home Residents-Arkansas, June-August 2020.养老院居民中侵袭性较小的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2)诊断样本比较-阿肯色州,2020 年 6 月至 8 月。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(Suppl 1):S58-S64. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab310.
2
Performance Evaluation of Serial SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Testing During a Nursing Home Outbreak.养老院内爆发期间对连续 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的性能评估。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jul;174(7):945-951. doi: 10.7326/M21-0422. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
Descriptive evaluation of antibody responses to severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in plasma and gingival crevicular fluid in a nursing home cohort-Arkansas, June-August 2020.描述性评估养老院队列中血浆和龈沟液中针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的抗体反应-阿肯色州,2020 年 6 月至 8 月。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;43(11):1610-1617. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.484. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
4
Evaluating the Presence of Replication-Competent Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) From Nursing Home Residents With Persistently Positive Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Results.评估持续 RT-PCR 阳性的养老院居民中存在复制型有感染力的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 11;74(3):525-528. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab436.
5
Buccal swabs as non-invasive specimens for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2.颊拭子作为非侵入性标本用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型。
J Int Med Res. 2021 May;49(5):3000605211016996. doi: 10.1177/03000605211016996.
6
Infectious Period of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in 17 Nursing Home Residents-Arkansas, June-August 2020.2020年6月至8月阿肯色州17名疗养院居民中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的传染期
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 30;8(3):ofab048. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab048. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Epidemiologic Characteristics Associated With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antigen-Based Test Results, Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) Cycle Threshold Values, Subgenomic RNA, and Viral Culture Results From University Testing.与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)抗原检测结果、实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)循环阈值、亚基因组 RNA 和病毒培养结果相关的流行病学特征,来自大学检测。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 15;73(6):e1348-e1355. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab303.
8
A Multiplex One-Step RT-qPCR Protocol to Detect SARS-CoV-2 in NP/OP Swabs and Saliva.一种用于检测 NP/OP 拭子和唾液中 SARS-CoV-2 的多重一步法 RT-qPCR 方案。
Curr Protoc. 2021 May;1(5):e145. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.145.
9
Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 on Self-Collected Saliva or Anterior Nasal Specimens Compared With Healthcare Personnel-Collected Nasopharyngeal Specimens.与医护人员采集的鼻咽标本相比,自我采集的唾液或前鼻标本中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的检测。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(Suppl 1):S65-S73. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab330.
10
Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.拭子类型和采集时间对 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-COV-2 的影响。
J Virol Methods. 2020 Dec;286:113974. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113974. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
2
Considerations for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Genomic Surveillance: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and Association of Public Health Laboratories.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2基因组监测的考量:分子病理学协会和公共卫生实验室协会联合共识推荐
J Mol Diagn. 2025 Jan;27(1):12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.09.005. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
3
Variation in Time Between Testing Positive for COVID-19 and Hospital Admission by Race/Ethnicity and Insurance Status.新冠病毒检测呈阳性与因种族/族裔和保险状况而入院之间的时间差异。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023;34(4):1290-1304.
4
Nasal swab as an alternative specimen for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.鼻拭子作为检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的替代样本。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 16;6(4):e1213. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1213. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A scoping review.唾液作为 SARS-CoV-2 检测的诊断标本:系统评价。
Oral Dis. 2022 Nov;28 Suppl 2:2362-2390. doi: 10.1111/odi.14216. Epub 2022 Apr 27.