Suppr超能文献

水下内镜黏膜切除术治疗10毫米或更大的无蒂结直肠息肉:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Garg Rajat, Singh Amandeep, Aggarwal Manik, Bhalla Jaideep, Mohan Babu P, Burke Carol, Rustagi Tarun, Chahal Prabhleen

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Clin Endosc. 2021 May;54(3):379-389. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.276. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have reported the favorable outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) for colorectal polyps. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of UEMR for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (through May 2020) to identify studies reporting the outcomes of UEMR for ≥10 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. The assessed outcomes were recurrence rate on the first follow-up, en bloc resection, incomplete resection, and adverse events after UEMR.

RESULTS

A total of 1276 polyps from 16 articles were included in our study. The recurrence rate was 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-12) and 5.9% (95% CI, 3.6-9.4) for nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 and ≥20 mm, respectively. For nonpedunculated polyps ≥10 mm, the en bloc resection, R0 resection, and incomplete resection rates were 57.7% (95% CI, 42.4-71.6), 58.9% (95% CI, 42.4-73.6), and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.8-2.6), respectively. The rates of pooled adverse events, intraprocedural bleeding, and delayed bleeding were 7.0%, 5.4%, and 2.9%, respectively. The rate of perforation and postpolypectomy syndrome was 0.8%.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that UEMR for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥10 mm is safe and effective with a low rate of recurrence.

摘要

背景/目的:近期研究报道了水下内镜黏膜切除术(UEMR)治疗大肠息肉的良好效果。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估UEMR治疗直径≥10 mm的无蒂息肉的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们全面检索了多个数据库(截至2020年5月),以确定报告UEMR治疗直径≥10 mm的无蒂大肠息肉结果的研究。评估的结果包括首次随访时的复发率、整块切除率、不完全切除率以及UEMR后的不良事件。

结果

我们的研究纳入了16篇文章中的1276枚息肉。直径≥10 mm和≥20 mm的无蒂息肉的复发率分别为7.3%(95%置信区间[CI],4.3 - 12)和5.9%(95% CI,3.6 - 9.4)。对于直径≥10 mm的无蒂息肉,整块切除率、R0切除率和不完全切除率分别为57.7%(95% CI,42.4 - 71.6)、58.9%(95% CI,42.4 - 73.6)和1.5%(95% CI,0.8 - 2.6)。汇总的不良事件、术中出血和迟发性出血的发生率分别为7.0%、5.4%和2.9%。穿孔和息肉切除术后综合征的发生率为0.8%。

结论

我们的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,UEMR治疗直径≥10 mm的无蒂大肠息肉安全有效,复发率低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7702/8182235/7ebd2b29bdb1/ce-2020-276f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验