Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun;21(3):343-351. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1917386. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
: Personalized medicine-based treatments in advanced cancer hold the promise to offer substantial health benefits to genetic subgroups, but require efficient biomarker-based patient stratification to match the right treatment and may be expensive. Standard molecular diagnostics are currently very heterogeneous, and tests are often performed sequentially. The alternative to whole genome sequencing (WGS) i.e. simultaneously testing for all relevant DNA-based biomarkers thereby allowing immediate selection of the most optimal therapy, is more costly than current techniques. In the current implementation stage, it is important to explore the added value and cost-effectiveness of using WGS on a patient level and to assess optimal introduction of WGS on the level of the healthcare system.: First, an overview of current worldwide initiatives concerning the use of WGS in clinical practice for cancer diagnostics is given. Second, a comprehensive, early health technology assessment (HTA) approach of evaluating WGS in the Netherlands is described, relating to the following aspects: diagnostic value, WGS-based treatment decisions, assessment of long-term health benefits and harms, early cost-effectiveness modeling, nation-wide organization, and Ethical, Legal and Societal Implications.: This study provides evidence to guide further development and implementation of WGS in clinical practice and the healthcare system.
基于个体化医学的晚期癌症治疗有望为特定基因亚组带来显著的健康益处,但需要有效的基于生物标志物的患者分层,以匹配正确的治疗方法,而且可能较为昂贵。目前标准的分子诊断非常多样化,检测通常是顺序进行的。全基因组测序(WGS)的替代方法,即同时检测所有相关的基于 DNA 的生物标志物,从而可以立即选择最优化的治疗方法,比当前技术更昂贵。在当前的实施阶段,重要的是要探讨在患者层面使用 WGS 的附加值和成本效益,并评估在医疗保健系统层面引入 WGS 的最佳方案。
首先,概述了目前全球范围内在癌症诊断中使用 WGS 的临床实践中的相关倡议。
其次,描述了一种全面的、早期的卫生技术评估(HTA)方法,用于评估荷兰的 WGS,涉及以下方面:诊断价值、基于 WGS 的治疗决策、长期健康效益和危害评估、早期成本效益建模、全国组织以及伦理、法律和社会影响。
这项研究提供了证据,以指导 WGS 在临床实践和医疗保健系统中的进一步发展和实施。