• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何组建一个软件工程顶点项目团队?

How to form a software engineering capstone team?

作者信息

Shaikh Muhammad Khalid

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science & Technology, Karachi Pakistan.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2021 Apr 10;7(4):e06629. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06629. eCollection 2021 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06629
PMID:33912697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8063748/
Abstract

This research paper answers the question that how shall the students of software engineering undergraduate courses form teams for the capstone projects that can be cohesive too. In this research, 128 criteria for team formation are proposed for building teams for self-managing software engineering capstone projects. A comparison is also conducted to ascertain the level of cohesion among those teams that were formed using the proposed criteria and those that were not formed using the proposed criteria. The criteria were identified through a combination of qualitative questionnaire survey targeted at the graduated students of the past batches of Computer Science degree program and through synthesizing the literature on engineering capstone project teams identified under the guidance of KSAO framework for software engineering students. To check the effectiveness of the criteria, 100 students were asked to form the teams using the proposed criteria and other 100 students formed the teams without the proposed criteria. Those students that had used the proposed criteria for building teams and those that had formed teams without using the proposed criteria were asked to fill the modified Group Environment Questionnaire to ascertain the level of cohesion among the team members. The results were analyzed qualitatively and through descriptive quantification. The results show that the level of cohesion in teams that were formed using the proposed team building criteria was higher. There was a need for team building criteria in the literature on software engineering capstone project teams that conforms to a conceptual, theoretical framework; this gap is now filled through this research. This paper may also serve as a literature review paper for some readers.

摘要

本研究论文回答了软件工程本科课程的学生应如何为最终项目组建具有凝聚力的团队这一问题。在本研究中,提出了128条团队组建标准,用于组建自我管理的软件工程最终项目团队。还进行了一项比较,以确定使用所提出的标准组建的团队与未使用所提出的标准组建的团队之间的凝聚力水平。这些标准是通过针对过去几批计算机科学学位课程的毕业生进行的定性问卷调查,并结合在软件工程学生的KSAO框架指导下确定的关于工程最终项目团队的文献综合得出的。为检验这些标准的有效性,100名学生被要求使用所提出的标准组建团队,另外100名学生在不使用所提出的标准的情况下组建团队。那些使用所提出的标准组建团队的学生和那些未使用所提出的标准组建团队的学生被要求填写修改后的团队环境问卷,以确定团队成员之间的凝聚力水平。对结果进行了定性分析和描述性量化分析。结果表明,使用所提出的团队组建标准组建的团队凝聚力水平更高。软件工程最终项目团队的文献中需要符合概念性、理论框架的团队建设标准;本研究填补了这一空白。本文对一些读者来说也可作为一篇文献综述论文。

相似文献

1
How to form a software engineering capstone team?如何组建一个软件工程顶点项目团队?
Heliyon. 2021 Apr 10;7(4):e06629. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06629. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Swarm intelligence-based model for improving prediction performance of low-expectation teams in educational software engineering projects.基于群体智能的模型,用于提高教育软件工程项目中低期望团队的预测性能。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Jan 19;8:e857. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.857. eCollection 2022.
3
Innovations in Remote Teaching of Engineering Design Teams.工程设计团队远程教学的创新
Annu Conf Expo (Am Soc Eng Educ). 2023 Apr;2023.
4
A global health capstone: an innovative educational approach in a competency-based curriculum for medical students.全球健康学概论:基于能力的医学教育课程中的创新性教学方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 19;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02070-z.
5
A Study of Capstone Courses Utilized in United States Doctor of Physical Therapy Program Curricula.美国物理治疗博士项目课程中顶点课程的研究
J Allied Health. 2018 Summer;47(2):147-151.
6
Team-Based Development of Medical Devices: An Engineering-Business Collaborative.基于团队的医疗设备开发:工程与商业协作
J Biomech Eng. 2016 Jul 1;138(7):0708031-5. doi: 10.1115/1.4032805.
7
A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Curricular Impact of a Capstone Course on the Self-Efficacy of Fourth-Year Medical Students.一种混合方法,用于理解顶点课程对四年级医学生自我效能感的课程影响。
Cureus. 2020 Aug 3;12(8):e9537. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9537.
8
Effect of interdisciplinary teaching on collaborative interactions among nursing student teams in Taiwan: A quasi-experimental study.跨学科教学对台湾护理学生团队协作互动的影响:一项准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Nov;106:105083. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105083. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
9
Student-led research team-building program may help junior faculty increase productivity in competitive biomedical research environment.学生主导的研究团队建设计划可能有助于初级教员在竞争激烈的生物医学研究环境中提高生产力。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 4;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02396-8.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

本文引用的文献

1
Best practices for team-based assistive technology design courses.团队型辅助技术设计课程的最佳实践。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Sep;41(9):1880-8. doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0798-2. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
2
Team learning and effectiveness in virtual project teams: the role of beliefs about interpersonal context.虚拟项目团队中的团队学习和有效性:人际背景信念的作用。
Span J Psychol. 2010 May;13(1):267-76. doi: 10.1017/s113874160000384x.
3
The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: a close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes.冲突解决在团队中的关键作用:深入探讨冲突类型、冲突管理策略与团队成果之间的联系。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;93(1):170-88. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.170.
4
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey.构建一个具有实际应用价值的目标设定与任务动机理论。一段长达35年的探索历程。
Am Psychol. 2002 Sep;57(9):705-17. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.57.9.705.
5
Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance.
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Oct;85(5):724-38. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.724.
6
Potency in groups: articulating a construct.群体中的效能:阐明一个概念。
Br J Soc Psychol. 1993 Mar;32 ( Pt 1):87-106. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00987.x.