• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体中的效能:阐明一个概念。

Potency in groups: articulating a construct.

作者信息

Guzzo R A, Yost P R, Campbell R J, Shea G P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park 20742.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 1993 Mar;32 ( Pt 1):87-106. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00987.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00987.x
PMID:8467372
Abstract

This paper examines potency, defined as the collective belief in a group that it can be effective, and its role in determining group effectiveness. The paper illustrates the construct and reviews its origins. The distinctiveness of potency from efficacy and from other collective and motivational constructs is described. The measurement of potency is also examined. The paper concludes with a presentation of a conceptual framework for understanding the determinants of potency and with a discussion of future theory, research and practice.

摘要

本文探讨了效能(定义为群体中关于自身能够有效发挥作用的集体信念)及其在决定群体效能方面的作用。本文阐述了这一概念结构并回顾了其起源。描述了效能与功效以及其他集体和动机性概念结构的区别。还研究了效能的测量方法。本文最后提出了一个用于理解效能决定因素的概念框架,并讨论了未来的理论、研究和实践。

相似文献

1
Potency in groups: articulating a construct.群体中的效能:阐明一个概念。
Br J Soc Psychol. 1993 Mar;32 ( Pt 1):87-106. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00987.x.
2
Social Identification in Sports Teams: The Role of Personal, Social, and Collective Identity Motives.体育团队中的社会认同:个人、社会和集体认同动机的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Apr;43(4):508-523. doi: 10.1177/0146167216689051. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
3
Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model.集体效能、群体效能与群体绩效:它们关系的元分析及中介模型检验
J Appl Psychol. 2009 May;94(3):814-28. doi: 10.1037/a0015659.
4
Collective autonomy and absenteeism within work teams: a team motivation approach.工作团队中的集体自治与旷工:一种团队激励方法。
J Psychol. 2013 Mar-Apr;147(2):153-75. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2012.678413.
5
Group entity belief: an individual difference construct based on implicit theories of social identities.群体实体信念:一种基于社会身份隐性理论的个体差异结构。
J Pers. 2008 Jul;76(4):707-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00501.x. Epub 2008 May 12.
6
The Italian Red Brigades and the structure and dynamics of terrorist groups.意大利红色旅与恐怖组织的结构和动态
Int J Psychoanal. 2010 Jun;91(3):541-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2010.00264.x.
7
Social identities and shared realities.社会认同与共同现实。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Oct;23:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
8
Individuality and social influence in groups: inductive and deductive routes to group identity.群体中的个性与社会影响:群体认同的归纳与演绎路径
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Nov;89(5):747-63. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.747.
9
Collective school-type identity: predicting students' motivation beyond academic self-concept.集体学校型身份认同:预测学生超越学业自我概念的动机。
Int J Psychol. 2011 Jun 1;46(3):191-205. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2010.529907.
10
Working for the self or working for the group: how self- versus group affirmation affects collective behavior in low-status groups.为自己工作还是为群体工作:自我肯定与群体肯定如何影响低地位群体中的集体行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):183-202. doi: 10.1037/a0013068.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of charismatic leadership on performance: exploring key boundary conditions at multilevel.魅力型领导对绩效的影响:多层次关键边界条件探究
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 15;16:1487886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1487886. eCollection 2025.
2
Intellectual property protection as catalyst for radical technological innovation in national research program teams through innovation milieu and group potentials.通过创新环境和团队潜力,知识产权保护成为国家研究项目团队激进技术创新的催化剂。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 23;14(1):25038. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74999-w.
3
Study examining the significant role of intellectual property protection in driving radical technological innovation among national research project teams, employing PLS-SEM and ANN modeling.
研究采用 PLS-SEM 和 ANN 建模,考察知识产权保护在推动国家研究项目团队激进技术创新方面的重要作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 7;19(8):e0307026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307026. eCollection 2024.
4
The Emergence of Value-Based Leadership Behavior at the Frontline of Management: A Role Theory Perspective and Future Research Agenda.管理前沿基于价值的领导行为的出现:角色理论视角与未来研究议程。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 25;12:635106. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635106. eCollection 2021.
5
How to form a software engineering capstone team?如何组建一个软件工程顶点项目团队?
Heliyon. 2021 Apr 10;7(4):e06629. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06629. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Virtual Teams in Times of Pandemic: Factors That Influence Performance.疫情时期的虚拟团队:影响绩效的因素
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 17;12:624637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624637. eCollection 2021.
7
Organizational Citizenship Behavior Predicts Quality, Creativity, and Efficiency Performance: The Roles of Occupational and Collective Efficacies.组织公民行为预测质量、创造力和效率绩效:职业效能和集体效能的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 24;11:758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00758. eCollection 2020.
8
Associations Between Self-Determined Motivation, Team Potency, and Self-Talk in Team Sports.团队运动中自我决定动机、团队效能感与自我对话之间的关联
J Hum Kinet. 2019 Nov 30;70:245-259. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0116. eCollection 2019 Nov.
9
From social interactions to interpersonal relationships: Influences on ultra-runners' race experience.从社交互动到人际关系:影响超级跑者比赛体验的因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 2;14(12):e0225195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225195. eCollection 2019.
10
University Student's Academic Goals When Working in Teams: Questionnaire on Academic Goals in Teamwork, 3 × 2 Model.大学生团队合作中的学术目标:团队合作中学术目标问卷,3×2模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 24;10:2434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02434. eCollection 2019.