• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下黏膜切除术治疗结直肠病变的环周黏膜下切开术与传统内镜下黏膜切除术的对比研究:以无蒂锯齿状病变的内镜特征为特征。

Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions with endoscopic features of sessile serrated lesions.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea.

Departments of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2087-2095. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08495-x. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08495-x
PMID:33913030
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are more prone to incomplete resection than conventional adenomas. This study evaluated whether circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (CSI-EMR) can increase the rate of complete and en bloc resections of colorectal lesions with endoscopic features of SSL.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses and propensity score matching were performed for the resection of colorectal lesions ≥ 10 mm with endoscopic features of SSL.

RESULTS

After 1:1 ratio matching, 127 lesions in the CSI-EMR group and 127 in the EMR group were selected for analysis. The median size of the lesions was 15 mm (IQR 12-16) in both groups. There was no significant difference in either the complete resection rate or en bloc resection rate between CSI-EMR and EMR groups (96.9% vs. 92.9%, P = 0.155; 92.1% vs. 89.0%, P = 0.391). By contrast, the R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the CSI-EMR group than in the EMR group (89.8% vs. 59.8%, P < 0.001). The median procedure time was significantly longer in the CSI-EMR group than in the EMR group (6.28 min vs. 2.55 min, P < 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of adverse events or recurrence rate. Multivariate analysis showed that CSI-EMR was the only factor significantly associated with R0 resection (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For colorectal lesions with endoscopic features of SSL, CSI-EMR does not increase the complete or en bloc resection rate, but does increase the R0 resection rate. The procedure time is longer for CSI-EMR than EMR. The association of CSI-EMR with R0 resection and non-recurrence should be further evaluated.

摘要

背景与目的

无蒂锯齿状病变(SSLs)比传统腺瘤更容易出现不完全切除。本研究评估了内镜黏膜切除(EMR)前环形黏膜下切开(CSI-EMR)是否可以提高内镜表现为 SSL 的结直肠病变的完全和整块切除率。

方法

对内镜表现为 SSL 的 ≥ 10mm 结直肠病变进行回顾性分析和倾向评分匹配。

结果

1:1 比例匹配后,CSI-EMR 组和 EMR 组分别有 127 个病变入选分析。两组病变的中位大小均为 15mm(IQR 12-16)。CSI-EMR 组和 EMR 组的完全切除率或整块切除率无显著差异(96.9% vs. 92.9%,P=0.155;92.1% vs. 89.0%,P=0.391)。相反,CSI-EMR 组的 R0 切除率显著高于 EMR 组(89.8% vs. 59.8%,P<0.001)。CSI-EMR 组的手术时间中位数显著长于 EMR 组(6.28 分钟 vs. 2.55 分钟,P<0.001),但两组不良事件发生率或复发率无显著差异。多变量分析显示,CSI-EMR 是唯一与 R0 切除显著相关的因素(P<0.001)。

结论

对于内镜表现为 SSL 的结直肠病变,CSI-EMR 不会增加完全或整块切除率,但会增加 R0 切除率。CSI-EMR 的手术时间长于 EMR。CSI-EMR 与 R0 切除和无复发的相关性应进一步评估。

相似文献

1
Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions with endoscopic features of sessile serrated lesions.内镜下黏膜切除术治疗结直肠病变的环周黏膜下切开术与传统内镜下黏膜切除术的对比研究:以无蒂锯齿状病变的内镜特征为特征。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2087-2095. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08495-x. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
2
Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm.内镜黏膜下切除术-预切开术与传统内镜黏膜切除术治疗直径为 10-20mm 的无蒂结直肠息肉。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 7;28(45):6397-6409. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397.
3
Lesion isolation by circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (CSI-EMR) substantially improves en bloc resection rates for 40-mm colonic lesions.内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)前环形黏膜下切开术(CSI-EMR)可显著提高 40mm 结肠病变的整块切除率。
Endoscopy. 2010 May;42(5):400-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243990. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
4
Comparison of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large (20-30 mm) flat colorectal lesions.内镜黏膜下切除术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗 20-30mm 大型平坦结直肠病变的比较。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;37(3):568-575. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15744. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal sessile/non-polypoid lesions.内镜黏膜切除术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠平坦/无蒂病变的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Aug;31(6):835-847. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2022.2032759. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
Standard Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Precutting Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Novel Disk-Tip Snare for Colorectal Lesions.标准内镜黏膜切除术与使用新型盘状圈套器的预切开内镜黏膜切除术治疗结直肠病变的比较
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 May;68(5):2030-2039. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07833-4. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
7
Comparison of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.冷圈套内镜黏膜切除术与热圈套内镜黏膜切除术治疗小大肠息肉的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20335. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71067-1.
8
Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗内镜黏膜切除术后复发性结直肠肿瘤的可行性
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2019 Jul-Sep;82(3):375-378.
9
Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal sessile polyps.内镜黏膜下切除术治疗大肠大型无蒂息肉。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1820-1826. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07581-w. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
10
Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: A systematic review.内镜下黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠病变:系统评价。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016 Aug;104:138-55. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal subepithelial lesions: a retrospective cohort study.内镜下切除非壶腹十二指肠黏膜下病变:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jul 31;39(1):122. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04698-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Tolerability of High- vs Low-Volume Split-Dose Bowel Cleansing Regimens for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.高容量与低容量分次剂量肠道准备方案用于结肠镜检查的疗效和耐受性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jun;18(7):1454-1465.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.044. Epub 2019 Nov 1.