Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Endoscopy. 2010 May;42(5):400-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243990. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
En bloc resection is preferred for colonic laterally spreading tumors, but is limited to 20 mm with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) using normal saline submucosal injection. Our aims were to compare the efficacy and safety of circumferential submucosal incision prior to EMR (CSI-EMR) versus conventional EMR for en bloc resection of artificial lesions 40 x 40 mm in size using submucosal injection of succinylated gelatin in a porcine colon model.
Two areas of normal rectosigmoid mucosa measuring 40 x 40 mm were marked with soft coagulation for en bloc resection in each of 10 pigs. By alternate allocation, one was removed with conventional snare-based EMR following submucosal injection of succinylated gelatin. The other was circumferentially incised using an insulated-tip knife, followed by submucosal succinylated gelatin injection followed by EMR of the isolated area. All procedures were performed by a single endoscopist with significant experience of EMR but none of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Euthanasia and colectomy were performed on day 10. Specimens and ex vivo colon resection sites were examined by a specialist gastrointestinal histopathologist blinded to the technique used.
En bloc excision rates were 70 % for CSI-EMR vs. 0 % for conventional EMR ( P = 0.016). The median number of resections was 1 (interquartile range, IQR: 1-2) for CSI-EMR vs. 4 (3 - 6) for EMR ( P < 0.001). Mean specimen dimensions were 50 x 43 mm for CSI-EMR vs. 37 x 32 mm for EMR ( P = 0.001). Overall procedure duration (mean +/- SD) was 30.3 +/- 19.8 minutes for CSI-EMR vs. 12.4 +/- 6.8 minutes ( P = 0.003) for EMR. The mean duration of the final 5 CSI-EMRs was 17 minutes, with a statistically significant learning effect R = -0.7, P = 0.025. No perforations or bleeding occurred. All animals were euthanased on day 10. Histologically, CSI-EMR resulted in larger specimens and deeper submucosal resections.
CSI-EMR with submucosal injection of succinylated gelatin is safe and superior to conventional EMR, consistently resulting in en bloc resections larger than 50 x 40 mm. With experience, total procedure duration is comparable.
经内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)采用生理盐水黏膜下注射,对于侧向扩展的结肠肿瘤,推荐整块切除,但最大直径限制在 20mm 以内。本研究旨在比较环周黏膜下切开术(CSI-EMR)与传统 EMR 在前瞻性猪模型中整块切除大小为 40x40mm 的人工病变的疗效和安全性,黏膜下注射琥珀酰明胶。
10 只猪的直肠乙状结肠各标记 2 个 40x40mm 的正常区域,行整块切除术,均采用软凝法。通过交替分配,1 组黏膜下注射琥珀酰明胶后采用传统的圈套器 EMR 切除,另 1 组采用电切环进行环周切开,然后注射琥珀酰明胶,再切除孤立区域。所有操作均由一位具有丰富 EMR 经验但无内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)经验的内镜医生完成。第 10 天行安乐死和结肠切除术。由一位对技术使用情况不知情的胃肠道病理学家专家对标本和离体结肠切除部位进行检查。
CSI-EMR 的整块切除率为 70%,而传统 EMR 为 0%(P=0.016)。CSI-EMR 的中位切除次数为 1 次(四分位距,IQR:1-2),而 EMR 为 4 次(3-6)(P<0.001)。CSI-EMR 的标本尺寸中位数为 50x43mm,而 EMR 为 37x32mm(P=0.001)。CSI-EMR 的总手术时间(均值±标准差)为 30.3±19.8 分钟,而 EMR 为 12.4±6.8 分钟(P=0.003)。最后 5 例 CSI-EMR 的平均手术时间为 17 分钟,存在统计学显著的学习效应 R=-0.7,P=0.025。无穿孔或出血。所有动物均在第 10 天行安乐死。组织学检查显示,CSI-EMR 导致标本更大,黏膜下切除更深。
在黏膜下注射琥珀酰明胶的 CSI-EMR 是安全的,优于传统 EMR,可始终实现大于 50x40mm 的整块切除。随着经验的积累,总手术时间相当。