Ferguson Monika, Rhodes Kate, Loughhead Mark, McIntyre Heather, Procter Nicholas
Arch Suicide Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;26(3):1022-1045. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2021.1915217. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
The safety planning intervention (SPI) is gaining momentum in suicide prevention practice and research. This systematic review sought to determine the effectiveness of the SPI for adults experiencing suicide-related distress. Systematic searches of international, peer-reviewed literature were conducted in six databases (Cochrane Trials, Embase, Emcare, Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science), including terms for safety planning, suicide, and suicide-related outcomes. A total of 565 results were included for screening. Result screening (title/abstract and full-text), data extraction and critical appraisal were conducted in duplicate. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were primarily quantitative ( = 20), largely with general adult or veteran samples; a small number of studies explored the perspectives of staff and significant others. Half of the studies included the SPI as a standalone intervention, while the other half examined the SPI in combination with other interventions. Most interventions were delivered in-person, with a hard-copy safety plan created, while a smaller number explored internet-based interventions. Primary measures included: suicidality (ideation, behavior, deaths; 10 studies), suicide-related outcomes (depression, hopelessness; 5 studies) and treatment outcomes (hospitalizations, treatment engagement; 7 studies). The evidence supports improvements in each of these domains, with complementary findings from the remaining quantitative and qualitative studies suggesting that the SPI is a feasible and acceptable intervention. While positive, these findings are limited by the heterogeneity of interventions and study designs, making the specific impact of the SPI difficult to both determine and generalize. Conversely, this also points to the flexibility of the SPI.HighlightsThe Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) is a valuable indicated intervention for general adult and veteran populations experiencing suicide-related distress, primarily in face-to-face, clinical settings.Quantitative findings indicate associations between the SPI and improvements in suicidal ideation and behavior, decreases in depression and hopelessness, along with reductions in hospitalizations and improvements in treatment attendance.Qualitative studies suggest the SPI is acceptable and feasible, with areas for development.SPIs have been shown to be adaptable to the clinical area in its modality (digital or paper-based), delivery (face-to-face or online), facilitation (clinician or self-administered) and multiplicity (as stand-alone or combined intervention).
安全计划干预措施(SPI)在自杀预防实践和研究中越来越受到关注。本系统评价旨在确定SPI对有自杀相关困扰的成年人的有效性。我们在六个数据库(Cochrane试验、Embase、Emcare、Medline、PsycINFO和科学网)中对国际同行评审文献进行了系统检索,检索词包括安全计划、自杀和自杀相关结果。总共纳入565条结果进行筛选。结果筛选(标题/摘要和全文)、数据提取和批判性评价均由两人独立进行。26项研究符合纳入标准。研究主要为定量研究(n = 20),样本大多为普通成年人或退伍军人;少数研究探讨了工作人员和重要他人的观点。一半的研究将SPI作为独立干预措施,另一半研究则将SPI与其他干预措施相结合进行考察。大多数干预措施是面对面实施的,并制定了纸质安全计划,少数研究探讨了基于互联网的干预措施。主要测量指标包括:自杀观念(想法、行为、死亡;10项研究)、自杀相关结果(抑郁、绝望;5项研究)和治疗结果(住院、治疗参与度;7项研究)。证据支持这些领域中的每一个都有改善,其余定量和定性研究的补充结果表明SPI是一种可行且可接受的干预措施。虽然这些结果是积极的,但由于干预措施和研究设计的异质性,使得SPI的具体影响难以确定和推广。相反,这也表明了SPI的灵活性。
要点
安全计划干预措施(SPI)对于有自杀相关困扰的普通成年人和退伍军人来说是一种有价值的针对性干预措施,主要适用于面对面的临床环境。
定量研究结果表明SPI与自杀观念和行为的改善、抑郁和绝望程度的降低以及住院次数的减少和治疗参与度的提高之间存在关联。
定性研究表明SPI是可接受且可行的,同时也指出了有待发展的领域。
SPI已被证明在其形式(数字或纸质)、实施方式(面对面或在线)、促进方式(临床医生或自我管理)和多样性(作为独立或联合干预)方面能够适应临床领域。