School of Dentistry, UFPEL - Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
School of Dentistry, USP - University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2021 Jan-Feb;32(1):67-77. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202104291.
In this study, we describe a method for reaching a target population (i.e., dentists practicing in Brazil) to engage in survey research using traditional e-mail invites and recruitment campaigns created on Instagram. This study addresses methodological aspects and compares respondents reached by different methods. A pre-tested questionnaire was used and participants were recruited for 10 days via a source list of email addresses and two discrete Instagram organic open campaigns. A total of 3,122 responses were collected: 509 participants were recruited by email (2.1% response rate) and 2,613 by the two Instagram campaigns (20.7% and 11.7% conversion rates), respectively. Response/min collection rates in the first 24 h ranged between 0.23 (email) and 1.09 (first campaign). In total, 98.8% of all responses were received in the first 48 h for the different recruitment strategies. There were significant differences for all demographic variables (p< 0.001) between email and Instagram respondents, except for sex (p=0.37). Instagram respondents were slightly older, had more professional experience (years in practice), and a higher graduate education level than email respondents. Moreover, most email and Instagram respondents worked in the public sector and private practice, respectively. Although both strategies could collect responses from all Brazilian regions, email responses were slightly better distributed across the five territorial areas compared to Instagram. This study provides evidence that survey recruitment of a diverse, large population sample using Instagram is feasible. However, combination of email and Instagram recruitment led to a more diverse population and improved response rates.
在这项研究中,我们描述了一种方法,可以接触到目标人群(即,在巴西执业的牙医),使用传统的电子邮件邀请和在 Instagram 上创建的招聘活动进行调查研究。本研究探讨了方法学方面的问题,并比较了不同方法所接触到的受访者。使用了经过预测试的问卷,并通过电子邮件地址清单和两个离散的 Instagram 有机开放活动招募参与者,持续 10 天。共收集了 3122 份回复:通过电子邮件招募了 509 名参与者(回应率为 2.1%),通过两个 Instagram 活动分别招募了 2613 名参与者(转化率分别为 20.7%和 11.7%)。在头 24 小时内,每条回复的收集速度在 0.23(电子邮件)和 1.09(第一个活动)之间。对于不同的招聘策略,在头 48 小时内共收到了所有回复的 98.8%。电子邮件和 Instagram 受访者之间在所有人口统计学变量上(p<0.001)存在显著差异,除了性别(p=0.37)。Instagram 受访者年龄稍大,实践经验更多(实践年限),研究生教育水平更高,而电子邮件受访者则稍高。此外,大多数电子邮件和 Instagram 受访者分别在公共部门和私营部门工作。尽管两种策略都可以从巴西所有地区收集回复,但与 Instagram 相比,电子邮件回复在五个地区的分布更为均匀。本研究表明,使用 Instagram 招募多样化、大规模的人群进行调查是可行的。然而,电子邮件和 Instagram 联合招聘可以获得更具多样性的人群并提高回应率。