Henry Justine E, Kelley Michael E, LaRue Robert H, Kettering Tracy L, Gadaire Dana M, Sloman Kimberly N
The Scott Center for Autism Treatment, Florida Institute of Technology.
Department of Counseling and Human Services, The University of Scranton.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Jun;54(3):1045-1061. doi: 10.1002/jaba.841. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
Despite the utility of experimental functional analysis methodology, not all applications produce differentiated results. Factors such as interaction effects or methodological inefficiencies may compromise the likelihood of obtaining differentiated outcomes. Various studies have addressed methods to improve the efficiency of experimental functional analysis methodology (e.g., analysis of within-session responding). In the current study, we describe an updated model for progressing from brief to extended experimental analyses. The model incorporates several procedural refinements developed over the past 20+ years of experimental functional analysis research and additional conditions to confirm or annul findings. We present data for 20 participants who were referred for assessment and treatment of a variety of behavior problems (e.g., stereotypy, aggression, self-injury). We generally terminated the analyses when response patterns were consistent with established best-practice functional analysis methodology. Results showed conclusive interpretations were obtained for 100% of participants.
尽管实验性功能分析方法很有用,但并非所有应用都能产生有差异的结果。诸如交互作用效应或方法效率低下等因素可能会降低获得有差异结果的可能性。各种研究已经探讨了提高实验性功能分析方法效率的方法(例如,会话内反应分析)。在本研究中,我们描述了一个从简短实验分析发展到扩展实验分析的更新模型。该模型纳入了过去20多年实验性功能分析研究中开发的几种程序改进方法以及用于确认或废除研究结果的附加条件。我们展示了20名因各种行为问题(例如,刻板行为、攻击行为、自我伤害行为)前来接受评估和治疗的参与者的数据。当反应模式与既定的最佳实践功能分析方法一致时,我们通常会终止分析。结果显示,所有参与者都获得了确定性的解释。