• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喜好差距的发展:5 岁以上的儿童认为伴侣对他们的评价不如他们对伴侣的评价积极。

The Development of the Liking Gap: Children Older Than 5 Years Think That Partners Evaluate Them Less Positively Than They Evaluate Their Partners.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University.

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2021 May;32(5):789-798. doi: 10.1177/0956797620980754. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1177/0956797620980754
PMID:33914647
Abstract

After two strangers have briefly interacted with one another, both believe that they like their partner more than their partner likes them. A plausible explanation for this is that people are constantly worrying about how others are evaluating them. If so, one would expect the liking gap to emerge in young children as they become more concerned with their reputations and the impression they make on other people. The current study ( = 241 U.S. children; age range = 4-11 years) supported this hypothesis, showing a liking gap beginning when children were 5 years old, the age at which they first become concerned with other people's evaluations of them. Moreover, the liking gap became more pronounced as children got older. These findings provide the first developmental description of the liking gap and support the hypothesis that this phenomenon is related to individuals' concerns for how others evaluate them.

摘要

在两个陌生人进行了短暂的互动之后,双方都会认为自己比对方更喜欢自己的伴侣。对于这种现象有一种合理的解释,即人们总是在担心别人如何评价自己。如果是这样,人们会期望这种喜欢差距会在小孩子中出现,因为他们开始更加关注自己的声誉和给别人留下的印象。本研究(= 241 名美国儿童;年龄范围= 4-11 岁)支持了这一假设,表明喜欢差距从儿童 5 岁时开始出现,此时他们开始关注他人对自己的评价。此外,随着儿童年龄的增长,这种差距变得更加明显。这些发现提供了对喜欢差距的第一个发展描述,并支持了这样一种假设,即这种现象与个体对他人评价的关注有关。

相似文献

1
The Development of the Liking Gap: Children Older Than 5 Years Think That Partners Evaluate Them Less Positively Than They Evaluate Their Partners.喜好差距的发展:5 岁以上的儿童认为伴侣对他们的评价不如他们对伴侣的评价积极。
Psychol Sci. 2021 May;32(5):789-798. doi: 10.1177/0956797620980754. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
2
The Liking Gap in Conversations: Do People Like Us More Than We Think?对话中的好感差距:人们真的比我们想象的更喜欢我们吗?
Psychol Sci. 2018 Nov;29(11):1742-1756. doi: 10.1177/0956797618783714. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
3
Social anxiety and liking: Towards understanding the role of metaperceptions in first impressions.社交焦虑与喜爱:理解元认知在第一印象中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct;121(4):948-968. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000363. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
4
"Zooming" in on positive and accurate metaperceptions in first impressions: Examining the links with social anxiety and liking in online video interactions.在第一印象中准确感知积极和准确的印象:在线视频互动中考察与社交焦虑和喜欢的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Oct;125(4):852-873. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000457. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
The liking-similarity effect: perceptions of similarity as a function of liking.喜欢相似效应:相似性知觉作为喜欢的函数。
J Soc Psychol. 2014 Sep-Oct;154(5):384-400. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.914882.
6
Neural precursors of future liking and affective reciprocity.未来喜好和情感互惠的神经前体。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 24;115(17):4375-4380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802176115. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
7
The effect of personal relevance on psychological inference: a developmental analysis.
Child Dev. 1988 Oct;59(5):1339-52.
8
Does interpersonal liking lead to interpersonal synchrony in musical contexts?在音乐情境中,人际间的喜爱会导致人际同步吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Feb;76(2):460-467. doi: 10.1177/17470218221094306. Epub 2022 May 25.
9
Motivation for social contact across the life span: a theory of socioemotional selectivity.毕生社会交往动机:社会情感选择性理论
Nebr Symp Motiv. 1992;40:209-54.
10
Using versus liking: Young children use ownership to predict actions but not to infer preferences.使用与喜好:幼儿利用所有权来预测行为,但并非用其推断偏好。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 May;169:19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer victimization but not social anxiety negatively influences predicted enjoyment during peer interactions.同伴间的欺侮行为而非社交焦虑对同伴互动期间的预期乐趣产生负面影响。
J Mood Anxiety Disord. 2025 Mar;9. doi: 10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100105. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
Who Will Be My Friend? The Role of the Liking Gap in Preschooler Friend Selection.谁会成为我的朋友?喜爱差距在学龄前儿童朋友选择中的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;15(2):196. doi: 10.3390/bs15020196.
3
Collaborative imagination synchronizes representations of the future and fosters social connection in the present.
协作想象同步了未来的表现形式,并促进了当下的社会联系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 18;121(25):e2318292121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2318292121. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
4
Give Me a Straight Answer: Response Ambiguity Diminishes Likability.给我一个明确的答案:回答含糊会降低受欢迎程度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 May;51(5):701-715. doi: 10.1177/01461672231199161. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
5
Changes in self-other boundaries modulate children's body image attitudes.自我与他人边界的变化会调节儿童的身体形象态度。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 May 3;17:1181395. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1181395. eCollection 2023.