• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

存在猜测和粗心作答情况时基于四参数逻辑斯蒂模型的考生能力稳健估计

The robust estimation of examinee ability based on the four-parameter logistic model when guessing and carelessness responses exist.

作者信息

Jian Xiaozhu, Buyun Dai, Yuanping Deng

机构信息

Educational Department, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.

School of Educational, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, Jiangxi Province, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0250268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250268. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0250268
PMID:33914784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8084210/
Abstract

The three-parameter Logistic model (3PLM) and the four-parameter Logistic model (4PLM) have been proposed to reduce biases in cases of response disturbances, including random guessing and carelessness. However, they could also influence the examinees who do not guess or make careless errors. This paper proposes a new approach to solve this problem, which is a robust estimation based on the 4PLM (4PLM-Robust), involving a critical-probability guessing parameter and a carelessness parameter. This approach is compared with the 2PLM-MLE(two-parameter Logistic model and a maximum likelihood estimator), the 3PLM-MLE, the 4PLM-MLE, the Biweight estimation and the Huber estimation in terms of bias using an example and three simulation studies. The results show that the 4PLM-Robust is an effective method for robust estimation, and its calculation is simpler than the Biweight estimation and the Huber estimation.

摘要

为减少包括随机猜测和粗心大意在内的反应干扰情况下的偏差,人们提出了三参数逻辑模型(3PLM)和四参数逻辑模型(4PLM)。然而,它们也可能会影响那些不猜测或不犯粗心错误的考生。本文提出了一种新的方法来解决这个问题,即基于4PLM的稳健估计(4PLM-Robust),其中涉及一个临界概率猜测参数和一个粗心参数。通过一个示例和三项模拟研究,将该方法与两参数逻辑模型和最大似然估计器(2PLM-MLE)、3PLM-MLE、4PLM-MLE、双权估计和休伯估计在偏差方面进行了比较。结果表明,4PLM-Robust是一种有效的稳健估计方法,其计算比双权估计和休伯估计更简单。

相似文献

1
The robust estimation of examinee ability based on the four-parameter logistic model when guessing and carelessness responses exist.存在猜测和粗心作答情况时基于四参数逻辑斯蒂模型的考生能力稳健估计
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0250268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250268. eCollection 2021.
2
The Bayesian Expectation-Maximization-Maximization for the 3PLM.用于三参数逻辑斯蒂模型的贝叶斯期望最大化算法。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 31;10:1175. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01175. eCollection 2019.
3
Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.对反应和反应时间的层次模型进行稳健估计。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2019 Feb;72(1):83-107. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12143. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
4
Shrinkage estimation of the three-parameter logistic model.三参数逻辑斯蒂模型的收缩估计。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2021 Nov;74(3):591-609. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12241. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
5
A mixture model for responses and response times with a higher-order ability structure to detect rapid guessing behaviour.一种用于反应和反应时间的混合模型,具有高阶能力结构以检测快速猜测行为。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 May;73(2):261-288. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12175. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
6
Marginalized maximum a posteriori estimation for the four-parameter logistic model under a mixture modelling framework.在混合建模框架下四参数逻辑斯蒂模型的边缘化极大后验估计。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Nov;73 Suppl 1:51-82. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12185. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
7
A Comparison of Robust Likelihood Estimators to Mitigate Bias From Rapid Guessing.稳健似然估计器用于减轻快速猜测偏差的比较
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 May;46(3):236-249. doi: 10.1177/01466216221084371. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
8
Correction: The robust estimation of examinee ability based on the four-parameter logistic model when guessing and carelessness responses exist.更正:存在猜测和粗心作答情况时基于四参数逻辑斯蒂模型的考生能力稳健估计。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0258023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258023. eCollection 2021.
9
A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.对有界连续结果的因果效应的靶向最大似然估计量。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(1):Article 26. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1260. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
10
On the asymptotic standard error of a class of robust estimators of ability in dichotomous item response models.关于二分项目反应模型中一类能力稳健估计量的渐近标准误差
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 Nov;67(3):430-50. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12027. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: The robust estimation of examinee ability based on the four-parameter logistic model when guessing and carelessness responses exist.更正:存在猜测和粗心作答情况时基于四参数逻辑斯蒂模型的考生能力稳健估计。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0258023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258023. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up: Can High Ability Students Recover From Early Mistakes in CAT?我摔倒了,起不来:高能力学生能从CAT早期的错误中恢复过来吗?
Appl Psychol Meas. 2009 Mar 1;33(2):83-101. doi: 10.1177/0146621608324023.
2
Estimation of a four-parameter item response theory model.四参数项目反应理论模型的估计。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2010 Nov;63(Pt 3):509-25. doi: 10.1348/000711009X474502. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
3
How many IRT parameters does it take to model psychopathology items?对精神病理学项目进行建模需要多少个项目反应理论(IRT)参数?
Psychol Methods. 2003 Jun;8(2):164-84. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.8.2.164.