Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK.
FPCEE Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;18(7):3702. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073702.
Smartphones are used by billions of people worldwide. However, some psychologists have argued that use of this technology is addictive, even though little research utilises objective smartphone usage records to verify this claim. We conducted an exploratory study to identify whether behavioural differences exist between those who self-identify as addicted smartphone users and those who do not. We gathered retrospective smartphone usage data from 131 Android users and asked them about their past use to compare their perception of their usage against their actual usage. We could not identify any reliable differences between the smartphone activity of those self-identified as addicted smartphone users and other users. Furthermore, smartphone scales are generally good at identifying who believes themselves to be addicted, although they do not reflect objective smartphone use. This study questions the use of self-report measures to diagnosis behavioural addictions without relevant psychopathological constructs and emphasises the need for more rigorous study to conceptualise smartphone addiction.
智能手机在全球范围内被数十亿人使用。然而,一些心理学家认为,尽管很少有研究利用客观的智能手机使用记录来验证这一说法,但这种技术的使用是会上瘾的。我们进行了一项探索性研究,以确定自我认同的智能手机成瘾用户和非智能手机成瘾用户之间是否存在行为差异。我们从 131 名 Android 用户那里收集了回顾性的智能手机使用数据,并询问了他们过去的使用情况,以将他们对自己使用情况的看法与实际使用情况进行比较。我们无法确定自我认同的智能手机成瘾用户和其他用户的智能手机活动之间存在任何可靠差异。此外,智能手机量表通常善于识别那些认为自己上瘾的人,尽管它们并不能反映客观的智能手机使用情况。这项研究质疑了在没有相关精神病理学结构的情况下,使用自我报告措施来诊断行为成瘾的做法,并强调需要更严格的研究来概念化智能手机成瘾。