Department of Interior Architectural Design, Soongsil University, 360 Sando-ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul 06978, Korea.
Department of Architecture and Fire Safety, Dongyang University, 145, Dongyangdae-ro, Punggi-eup, Yeongju-si 36040, Korea.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 7;21(8):2583. doi: 10.3390/s21082583.
In order to evaluate the sensory perceptions of users who visited a train station, this study aimed to conduct an evaluation of their spatial emotions and identify the distance and type of transfer. For evaluation and verification, emotional recognition and wayfinding types were analyzed according to types in the groups (gender, age, and spatial familiarity) of experimental participants. There were two research questions: "Will the length of movement patterns in the experiment environment vary depending on the types of the participant group?" and "Is there any moderating effect in the interaction between spatial familiarity and the types of the participant groups?" A total of 28 participants were recruited with consideration of gender, age, and familiarity with spatial experience, which were used to analyze the participant groups. The experiment was conducted at a train station, and a vignette was presented to the participants to record the route and pattern of their wayfinding, followed by providing a questionnaire to record their spatial perception. SPSS was used to conduct a T-test, factor analysis, and multidimensional scaling (MDS). The differences in spatial perception were arranged in visual positioning based on emotional vocabulary, and average movement distances in the participant groups were compared in accordance with the type of wayfinding and interaction effect by ANOVA. The results showed that there was a difference in spatial perception depending on the negative emotional vocabulary and type of participant. An emotional positioning map for average comparison was prepared for each participant group (gender, age, and spatial familiarity) by using the factors extracted in the factor analysis (emotional factor, management factor, and aesthetic factor). Female and unfamiliar groups displayed negative results in the emotional factor (F = 7.202, < 0.05). In addition, male and familiar groups displayed negative results in the management factor (F = 3.058, < 0.10). In wayfinding, there was an interaction between gender and the resident group based on the status of their spatial familiarity. Through this, it was possible to extract negative emotional evaluations according to the type of participant and the interaction factors for the type and length of the wayfinding.
为了评估访问火车站的用户的感官感知，本研究旨在对他们的空间情感进行评估，并确定距离和换乘类型。为了评估和验证，根据实验参与者的组（性别、年龄和空间熟悉度）类型分析了情感识别和寻路类型。有两个研究问题：“实验环境中的运动模式长度是否会因参与者组的类型而异？”和“空间熟悉度与参与者组类型之间的相互作用是否存在调节作用？”共招募了 28 名参与者，考虑了性别、年龄和空间经验熟悉度，用于分析参与者组。实验在火车站进行，向参与者呈现一个情景，记录他们的寻路路线和模式，然后提供一份问卷记录他们的空间感知。使用 SPSS 进行 T 检验、因子分析和多维标度（MDS）。根据情绪词汇排列空间感知的差异，并根据寻路类型和方差分析比较参与者组的平均运动距离的差异和交互效应。结果表明，空间感知因负面情绪词汇和参与者类型而异。通过因子分析（情感因素、管理因素和美学因素）提取的因素，为每个参与者组（性别、年龄和空间熟悉度）准备了一个平均比较的情感定位图。女性和不熟悉群体在情感因素中表现出负面结果（F = 7.202，<0.05）。此外，男性和熟悉群体在管理因素中表现出负面结果（F = 3.058，<0.10）。在寻路方面，根据空间熟悉度的状态，性别和居民群体之间存在交互作用。通过这种方式，可以根据参与者的类型和寻路的类型和长度提取负面情绪评估。
