Suppr超能文献

配体与多巴胺 D3 受体相互作用的 PET:计算和体外方法。

Interaction of Ligands for PET with the Dopamine D3 Receptor: In Silico and In Vitro Methods.

机构信息

Division of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden.

出版信息

Biomolecules. 2021 Apr 2;11(4):529. doi: 10.3390/biom11040529.

Abstract

[F]Fallypride and [F]Fluortriopride (FTP) are two different PET radiotracers that bind with sub-nanomolar affinity to the dopamine D3 receptor (DR). In spite of their similar D affinities, the two PET ligands display very different properties for labeling the DR in vivo: [F]Fallypride is capable of binding to DR under "baseline" conditions, whereas [F]FTP requires the depletion of synaptic dopamine in order to image the receptor in vivo. These data suggest that [F]Fallypride is able to compete with synaptic dopamine for binding to the DR, whereas [F]FTP is not. The goal of this study was to conduct a series of docking and molecular dynamic simulation studies to identify differences in the ability of each molecule to interact with the DR that could explain these differences with respect to competition with synaptic dopamine. Competition studies measuring the ability of each ligand to compete with dopamine in the β-arrestin assay were also conducted. The results of the in silico studies indicate that FTP has a weaker interaction with the orthosteric binding site of the DR versus that of Fallypride. The results of the in silico studies were also consistent with the IC50 values of each compound in the dopamine β-arrestin competition assays. The results of this study indicate that in silico methods may be able to predict the ability of a small molecule to compete with synaptic dopamine for binding to the DR.

摘要

氟拉培匹特和氟托曲匹特(FTP)是两种不同的 PET 放射性示踪剂,它们与多巴胺 D3 受体(DR)的亲和力达到亚纳摩尔水平。尽管它们的 D 亲和力相似,但这两种 PET 配体在体内标记 DR 时表现出非常不同的特性:氟拉培匹特能够在“基线”条件下与 DR 结合,而氟托曲匹特则需要耗竭突触多巴胺才能在体内成像受体。这些数据表明,氟拉培匹特能够与突触多巴胺竞争结合 DR,而氟托曲匹特则不能。本研究的目的是进行一系列对接和分子动力学模拟研究,以确定每个分子与 DR 相互作用的能力差异,从而解释这些差异与与突触多巴胺竞争的关系。还进行了竞争研究,以测量每个配体在β-arrestin 测定中与多巴胺竞争的能力。计算机研究的结果表明,FTP 与 DR 的正位结合位点的相互作用弱于氟拉培匹特。计算机研究的结果也与多巴胺β-arrestin 竞争测定中每种化合物的 IC50 值一致。这项研究的结果表明,计算机方法可能能够预测小分子与突触多巴胺竞争结合 DR 的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7000/8065765/e3c16e44cebe/biomolecules-11-00529-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验