• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染性角膜炎的角膜培养:接种方法和培养基对角膜培养结果的影响

Corneal Culture in Infectious Keratitis: Effect of the Inoculation Method and Media on the Corneal Culture Outcome.

作者信息

Sagerfors Susanna, Karakoida Chrysoula, Sundqvist Martin, Ejdervik Lindblad Birgitta, Söderquist Bo

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE 701 82 Örebro, Sweden.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE 701 82 Örebro, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 21;10(9):1810. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091810.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10091810
PMID:33919274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8122416/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare two different methods of corneal culture in infectious keratitis: multiple sampling for direct inoculation and enrichment (standard method) and a single sample via transport medium for indirect inoculation (indirect inoculation method).

METHODS

Prospective inclusion of patients fulfilling predefined criteria of infectious keratitis undergoing corneal culture according to both studied methods in a randomized order.

RESULTS

The standard method resulted in a significantly higher proportion of positive culture outcomes among the 94 included episodes of infectious keratitis (61%; 57/94) than the indirect inoculation method (44%; 41/94) ( = 0.002) and a significantly higher proportion of microorganisms than the indirect inoculation method, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.28-0.49) for agreement between the methods. Subanalysis of culture results showed that direct inoculation on gonococcal agar only combined with the indirect inoculation method resulted in a similar rate of culture positive patients and proportion of detected microorganisms to the standard method.

CONCLUSION

Indirect inoculation of one corneal sample cannot replace direct inoculation of multiple corneal samples without loss of information. A combination of directly and indirectly inoculated samples can reduce the number of corneal samples by four without statistically significant differences in culture outcome or in the proportion of detected microorganisms.

摘要

背景

比较感染性角膜炎两种不同的角膜培养方法:多次取样直接接种和富集培养(标准方法)以及通过转运培养基单次取样进行间接接种(间接接种法)。

方法

前瞻性纳入符合感染性角膜炎预定义标准的患者,按照两种研究方法以随机顺序进行角膜培养。

结果

在纳入的94例感染性角膜炎病例中,标准方法培养结果阳性的比例(61%;57/94)显著高于间接接种法(44%;41/94)(P = 0.002),且检测到的微生物比例也显著高于间接接种法,两种方法结果一致性的Cohen's kappa值为0.38(95%CI:0.28 - 0.49)。培养结果的亚分析表明,仅在淋球菌琼脂上直接接种并结合间接接种法,培养阳性患者的比例和检测到的微生物比例与标准方法相似。

结论

对一个角膜样本进行间接接种无法替代对多个角膜样本进行直接接种而不损失信息。直接接种和间接接种样本相结合可将角膜样本数量减少四分之三,且培养结果或检测到的微生物比例无统计学显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ff/8122416/1cc11f7ed233/jcm-10-01810-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ff/8122416/1cc11f7ed233/jcm-10-01810-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5ff/8122416/1cc11f7ed233/jcm-10-01810-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Corneal Culture in Infectious Keratitis: Effect of the Inoculation Method and Media on the Corneal Culture Outcome.感染性角膜炎的角膜培养:接种方法和培养基对角膜培养结果的影响
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 21;10(9):1810. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091810.
2
Does the sampling instrument influence corneal culture outcome in patients with infectious keratitis? A retrospective study comparing cotton tipped applicator with knife blade.采样工具会影响感染性角膜炎患者的角膜培养结果吗?一项比较棉拭子与刀片的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 4;5(1):e000363. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000363. eCollection 2020.
3
Efficacy of transport media use versus direct inoculation of blood agar plates in the microbiologic evaluation of experimental Streptococcus pneumoniae keratitis.在实验性肺炎链球菌角膜炎的微生物学评估中,使用运送培养基与直接接种血琼脂平板的效果比较
Cornea. 2003 Apr;22(3):249-53. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200304000-00014.
4
In the eye of the ophthalmologist: the corneal microbiome in microbial keratitis.在眼科医生的眼中:微生物角膜炎中的角膜微生物组。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 May;262(5):1579-1589. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06310-y. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
5
Comparison of two methods for obtaining and transporting corneal samples in suspected infectious keratitis.疑似感染性角膜炎中两种获取和运输角膜样本方法的比较。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020 Jun;43(6):477-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.10.010. Epub 2020 May 19.
6
Reliability of transport medium in the laboratory evaluation of corneal ulcers.运输培养基在角膜溃疡实验室评估中的可靠性
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec;140(6):1027-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.06.042.
7
Microbiological culture versus 16S/18S rRNA gene PCR-sanger sequencing for infectious keratitis: a three-arm, diagnostic cross-sectional study.微生物培养与16S/18S rRNA基因PCR-桑格测序用于感染性角膜炎的比较:一项三臂诊断性横断面研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 12;11:1393832. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1393832. eCollection 2024.
8
Fungal keratitis in patients with corneal ulcer in Sari, Northern Iran.伊朗北部萨里角膜溃疡患者的真菌性角膜炎
Arch Iran Med. 2006 Jul;9(3):222-7.
9
Comparison of 3 corneal cytology collection methods for evaluating equine ulcerative keratitis: Cytobrush, kimura platinum spatula, and handle edge of scalpel blade.用于评估马溃疡性角膜炎的3种角膜细胞学采集方法的比较:细胞刷、木村铂金刮匙和手术刀刀片的刀柄边缘。
Vet Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;22(2):153-160. doi: 10.1111/vop.12574. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
10
The corneal ulcer one-touch study: a simplified microbiological specimen collection method.角膜溃疡一键式研究:一种简化的微生物标本采集方法。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;159(1):37-43.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbiological culture versus 16S/18S rRNA gene PCR-sanger sequencing for infectious keratitis: a three-arm, diagnostic cross-sectional study.微生物培养与16S/18S rRNA基因PCR-桑格测序用于感染性角膜炎的比较:一项三臂诊断性横断面研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 12;11:1393832. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1393832. eCollection 2024.
2
In the eye of the ophthalmologist: the corneal microbiome in microbial keratitis.在眼科医生的眼中:微生物角膜炎中的角膜微生物组。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 May;262(5):1579-1589. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06310-y. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Does the sampling instrument influence corneal culture outcome in patients with infectious keratitis? A retrospective study comparing cotton tipped applicator with knife blade.采样工具会影响感染性角膜炎患者的角膜培养结果吗?一项比较棉拭子与刀片的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 4;5(1):e000363. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000363. eCollection 2020.
2
The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: Global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance.微生物角膜炎的持续困境:全球负担、诊断和抗菌药物耐药性。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2019 May-Jun;64(3):255-271. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
3
Bacterial Keratitis in Toronto: A 16-Year Review of the Microorganisms Isolated and the Resistance Patterns Observed.
多伦多的细菌性角膜炎:对分离出的微生物及观察到的耐药模式的16年回顾。
Cornea. 2017 Dec;36(12):1528-1534. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001390.
4
Twelve-year analysis of microbial keratitis trends at a UK tertiary hospital.英国一家三级医院微生物性角膜炎趋势的十二年分析
Eye (Lond). 2017 Aug;31(8):1229-1236. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.55. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
5
New diagnostic tool in bacterial keratitis is not superior to traditional agar plates.细菌性角膜炎的新型诊断工具并不优于传统琼脂平板。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov;94(7):e671-e672. doi: 10.1111/aos.13051. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
6
Impression membrane for the diagnosis of microbial keratitis.用于诊断微生物性角膜炎的印模片
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 May;100(5):607-10. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307091. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
7
Trends in Microbiological and Antibiotic Sensitivity Patterns in Infectious Keratitis: 10-Year Experience in Mexico City.感染性角膜炎的微生物学及抗生素敏感性模式趋势:墨西哥城的十年经验
Cornea. 2015 Jul;34(7):778-85. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000428.
8
The corneal ulcer one-touch study: a simplified microbiological specimen collection method.角膜溃疡一键式研究:一种简化的微生物标本采集方法。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;159(1):37-43.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
9
Shifting trends in bacterial keratitis in Toronto: an 11-year review.多伦多细菌性角膜炎的变迁趋势:一项 11 年回顾。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Sep;119(9):1785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.031. Epub 2012 May 23.
10
Geographic variations in microbial keratitis: an analysis of the peer-reviewed literature.微生物角膜炎的地域差异:文献综述分析。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;95(6):762-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.169607. Epub 2011 Apr 8.