Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Landscaping on Challenging Urban Sites, Shanghai Academy of Landscape Architecture Science and Planning, 899 Longwu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200232, China.
Beijing Engineering Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 10;18(8):4000. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084000.
The landscape patterns of plantations (PT) are the results of human disturbances on local vegetation, and in turn, differ greatly from natural forests (NF), since the patterns strongly influence the natural circulation of material and energy. There is a need to understand the differences of landscape patterns between PT and NF, to establish a near natural afforestation strategy. This study chose three typical silvicultural counties in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River as the research areas and compared the landscape patterns of NF and PT, with other land use types (grassland, GL; cropland, CL; shrubland, SL; orchard, OR; built-up land, BUL; bare land, BL; and water bodies, WB). The results revealed that the areas of PT accounted for 7.67%, 12.05%, and 18.97% of three counties, bigger than GL, OC, BUL, BL, and WB, as one of main land use types. The landscape patterns of PT (mean patch size between 2.06 to 6.05 ha) were more fragmented than NF (mean patch size between 5.83 to 53.91 ha). NF areas increased along the relative altitude gradient, from 0 to 2500 m, while PT areas peaked from 100-1000 m. The higher the altitude, the more typical the zonal distribution of PT, the more aggregated the NF. NF had significant negative correlations with BL, BUL, CL, PT, GL, and OC, which suggest that human activities had seriously interfered with NF. Although PT as an ecological protection strategy was increasing, the landscape patterns of PT were obviously different from NF. This may affect the material energy flow in the ecological environment. The results in the present study have great implications in the other regions in China and the relevant parts of the world where natural forests were heavily disturbed.
人工林(PT)的景观格局是人类对当地植被干扰的结果,与天然林(NF)有很大的不同,因为这些格局强烈影响着物质和能量的自然循环。需要了解 PT 和 NF 之间景观格局的差异,以建立近自然造林策略。本研究选择长江中游的三个典型林业县作为研究区域,比较了 NF 和 PT 与其他土地利用类型(草地 GL、耕地 CL、灌丛 SL、果园 OR、建设用地 BUL、裸地 BL 和水体 WB)的景观格局。结果表明,三个县的 PT 面积分别占 7.67%、12.05%和 18.97%,大于 GL、OC、BUL、BL 和 WB,是主要土地利用类型之一。PT 的景观格局(平均斑块大小在 2.06 到 6.05 公顷之间)比 NF(平均斑块大小在 5.83 到 53.91 公顷之间)更为破碎。NF 面积随相对海拔梯度增加,从 0 到 2500 米,而 PT 面积则在 100-1000 米之间达到峰值。海拔越高,PT 的地带性分布越典型,NF 越聚集。NF 与 BL、BUL、CL、PT、GL 和 OC 呈显著负相关,表明人类活动严重干扰了 NF。尽管作为生态保护策略的 PT 在增加,但 PT 的景观格局与 NF 明显不同。这可能会影响生态环境中的物质能量流。本研究的结果对中国其他地区和世界上受天然林严重干扰的相关地区具有重要意义。