• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种针对办公人员 24 小时活动行为的随机对照多组分干预措施的效果:一种成分数据分析。

Effects of Two Randomized and Controlled Multi-Component Interventions Focusing On 24-Hour Movement Behavior among Office Workers: A Compositional Data Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Physical Activity and Health, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (GIH), 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Insurance medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;18(8):4191. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084191.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18084191
PMID:33920971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8071247/
Abstract

Intervention studies aiming at changing movement behavior have usually not accounted for the compositional nature of time-use data. Compositional data analysis (CoDA) has been suggested as a useful strategy for analyzing such data. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of two multi-component interventions on 24-h movement behavior (using CoDA) and on cardiorespiratory fitness among office workers; one focusing on reducing sedentariness and the other on increasing physical activity. Office workers ( = 263) were cluster randomized into one of two 6-month intervention groups, or a control group. Time spent in sedentary behavior, light-intensity, moderate and vigorous physical activity, and time in bed were assessed using accelerometers and diaries, both for 24 h in total, and for work and leisure time separately. Cardiorespiratory fitness was estimated using a sub-maximal cycle ergometer test. Intervention effects were analyzed using linear mixed models. No intervention effects were found, either for 24-h behaviors in total, or for work and leisure time behaviors separately. Cardiorespiratory fitness did not change significantly. Despite a thorough analysis of 24-h behaviors using CoDA, no intervention effects were found, neither for behaviors in total, nor for work and leisure time behaviors separately. Cardiorespiratory fitness did not change significantly. Although the design of the multi-component interventions was based on theoretical frameworks, and included cognitive behavioral therapy counselling, which has been proven effective in other populations, issues related to implementation of and compliance with some intervention components may have led to the observed lack of intervention effect.

摘要

干预研究旨在改变运动行为,但通常没有考虑到时间使用数据的组成性质。组成数据分析(CoDA)已被提议作为分析此类数据的有用策略。本研究的目的是检查两种多成分干预措施对办公室工作人员 24 小时运动行为(使用 CoDA)和心肺功能的影响;一种侧重于减少久坐行为,另一种侧重于增加身体活动。办公室工作人员(n=263)被聚类随机分为两个 6 个月干预组之一或对照组。使用加速度计和日记记录了 24 小时内的久坐行为、低强度、中等强度和高强度身体活动以及卧床时间,总共 24 小时,并分别记录了工作和休闲时间。心肺功能使用亚最大循环测力计测试进行估计。使用线性混合模型分析干预效果。无论是在总 24 小时行为还是在工作和休闲时间行为中,都没有发现干预效果。心肺功能没有显著变化。尽管使用 CoDA 对 24 小时行为进行了全面分析,但无论是在总行为中,还是在工作和休闲时间行为中,都没有发现干预效果。心肺功能没有显著变化。尽管多成分干预的设计基于理论框架,并包括已被证明在其他人群中有效的认知行为疗法咨询,但与一些干预成分的实施和遵守相关的问题可能导致了观察到的缺乏干预效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8071247/75010c32823f/ijerph-18-04191-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8071247/f7f2136df004/ijerph-18-04191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8071247/aea64f4d5117/ijerph-18-04191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8071247/ada991deee3e/ijerph-18-04191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8071247/395b1e7a04a0/ijerph-18-04191-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8071247/75010c32823f/ijerph-18-04191-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8071247/f7f2136df004/ijerph-18-04191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8071247/aea64f4d5117/ijerph-18-04191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8071247/ada991deee3e/ijerph-18-04191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8071247/395b1e7a04a0/ijerph-18-04191-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8071247/75010c32823f/ijerph-18-04191-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Two Randomized and Controlled Multi-Component Interventions Focusing On 24-Hour Movement Behavior among Office Workers: A Compositional Data Analysis.两种针对办公人员 24 小时活动行为的随机对照多组分干预措施的效果:一种成分数据分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;18(8):4191. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084191.
2
The effect of two multi-component behavior change interventions on cognitive functions.两种多成分行为改变干预措施对认知功能的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 31;22(1):1082. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13490-5.
3
The effectiveness of multi-component interventions targeting physical activity or sedentary behaviour amongst office workers: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial.针对办公人员身体活动或久坐行为的多组分干预措施的效果:一项三臂整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):1329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09433-7.
4
Clustering of 24-h movement behaviors associated with cardiorespiratory fitness among adolescents: a latent class analysis.青少年与心肺适能相关的 24 小时活动行为聚类:一项潜在类别分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Jan;180(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03719-z. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
The Relation between Domain-Specific Physical Behaviour and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Cross-Sectional Compositional Data Analysis on the Physical Activity Health Paradox Using Accelerometer-Assessed Data.特定领域身体活动行为与心肺功能适应性之间的关系:基于加速度计评估数据的体力活动健康悖论的跨截面组合数据分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 29;17(21):7929. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217929.
6
Daily domain-specific time-use composition of physical behaviors and blood pressure.日常特定领域的时间分配与身体活动和血压
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jan 10;16(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0766-1.
7
Movement behavior profiles and obesity: a latent profile analysis of 24-h time-use composition among Danish workers.运动行为特征与肥胖:丹麦劳动者 24 小时时间利用构成的潜在类别分析。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2020 Feb;44(2):409-417. doi: 10.1038/s41366-019-0419-8. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
8
Improving movement behavior in office workers: effects of two multi-level cluster-RCT interventions on mental health.改善办公室工作人员的运动行为:两种多层次群组 RCT 干预对心理健康的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17647-2.
9
Associations of 24-hours activity composition with adiposity and cardiorespiratory fitness: The PregnActive project.24 小时活动构成与肥胖和心肺适能的关系:PregnActive 项目。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 Feb;30(2):295-302. doi: 10.1111/sms.13566. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
10
Working from home during the COVID-19 outbreak in Sweden: effects on 24-h time-use in office workers.瑞典 COVID-19 疫情期间居家办公:对上班族 24 小时时间利用的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10582-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the intervention approach matter for improving 24-hour physical behaviours among overweight and obese Brazilian office workers?对于改善巴西超重和肥胖上班族的24小时身体行为而言,干预方法重要吗?
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):2699. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23957-w.
2
The association between 24-hour activity, sedentary and sleep compositions and mental health in Australian adults: a cross-sectional study.澳大利亚成年人24小时活动、久坐行为和睡眠构成与心理健康之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2023 Aug 1;2(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s44167-023-00024-6.
3
Relative time in physical activity and sedentary behaviour across a 2-year pedometer-based intervention in people with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of multi-component interventions targeting physical activity or sedentary behaviour amongst office workers: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial.针对办公人员身体活动或久坐行为的多组分干预措施的效果:一项三臂整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;20(1):1329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09433-7.
2
Associations between 24 h Movement Behavior and Mental Health in Office Workers.办公人员 24 小时活动行为与心理健康之间的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 27;17(17):6214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176214.
3
Time-Based Data in Occupational Studies: The Whys, the Hows, and Some Remaining Challenges in Compositional Data Analysis (CoDA).
在一项针对糖尿病前期或2型糖尿病患者基于计步器的为期两年的干预措施中,身体活动和久坐行为的相对时间:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2023 Jun 1;2(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s44167-023-00020-w.
4
Analysing time-use composition as dependent variables in physical activity and sedentary behaviour research: different compositional data analysis approaches.在体力活动和久坐行为研究中,将时间使用构成作为因变量进行分析:不同的成分数据分析方法。
J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2023 Nov 2;2(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s44167-023-00033-5.
5
Effectiveness of a parent-focused intervention targeting 24-hour movement behaviours in preschool-aged children: a randomised controlled trial.针对学龄前儿童 24 小时运动行为的以家长为中心的干预措施的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 9;21(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01650-2.
6
The Effect of Sedentary Behaviour on Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.久坐行为对心肺适能的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Sports Med. 2024 Apr;54(4):997-1013. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01986-y. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
7
Improving movement behavior in office workers: effects of two multi-level cluster-RCT interventions on mental health.改善办公室工作人员的运动行为:两种多层次群组 RCT 干预对心理健康的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17647-2.
8
Hybrid office work in women and men: do directly measured physical behaviors differ between days working from home and days working at the office?女性和男性的混合办公模式:在家办公日和在办公室办公日的直接测量身体行为有差异吗?
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Nov 28;67(9):1043-1055. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad057.
9
"It depends on the boss" - a qualitative study of multi-level interventions aiming at office workers' movement behaviour and mental health.“这取决于老板”——一项旨在改善上班族运动行为和心理健康的多层次干预措施的定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2258564. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2023.2258564. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
10
The interrelationship between physical activity intensity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and executive function in middle-aged adults: An observational study of office workers.中年成年人身体活动强度、心肺适能与执行功能之间的相互关系:一项对上班族的观察性研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;10:1035521. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035521. eCollection 2022.
基于时间的数据在职业研究中的应用:组合数据分析(CoDA)中的原因、方法和一些遗留挑战。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2020 Oct 8;64(8):778-785. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa056.
4
Sitting, standing and moving during work and leisure among male and female office workers of different age: a compositional data analysis.不同年龄的男女上班族在工作和休闲时的坐姿、站姿和活动情况:组合数据分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08909-w.
5
Compositional Data Analysis in Time-Use Epidemiology: What, Why, How.时间利用流行病学中的组合数据分析:是什么、为什么、怎么做。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 26;17(7):2220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072220.
6
Stronger Association between High Intensity Physical Activity and Cardiometabolic Health with Improved Assessment of the Full Intensity Range Using Accelerometry.使用加速度计更全面地评估运动强度,发现高强度体力活动与心血管代谢健康之间具有更强的关联性。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 18;20(4):1118. doi: 10.3390/s20041118.
7
Relationships between Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Cognitive Functions in Office Workers.办公人群中体力活动、久坐行为与认知功能的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 27;16(23):4721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234721.
8
Temporal features of sitting, standing and stepping changes in a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a workplace sitting-reduction intervention.在一项工作场所减少坐姿干预的集群随机对照试验中,坐姿、站立和踏步变化的时间特征。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 21;16(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0879-1.
9
Interventions to promote work ability by increasing sedentary workers' physical activity at workplaces - A scoping review.促进工作能力的干预措施:增加工作场所久坐工作者的身体活动-范围综述。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102962. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102962. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
10
Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy on nutrition improvement and weight of overweight and obese adolescents: A randomized controlled trial.认知行为疗法对超重和肥胖青少年营养改善及体重的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 May-Jun;13(3):2190-2197. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 22.