Department of Physical Activity and Health, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (GIH), 114 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Insurance medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;18(8):4191. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084191.
Intervention studies aiming at changing movement behavior have usually not accounted for the compositional nature of time-use data. Compositional data analysis (CoDA) has been suggested as a useful strategy for analyzing such data. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of two multi-component interventions on 24-h movement behavior (using CoDA) and on cardiorespiratory fitness among office workers; one focusing on reducing sedentariness and the other on increasing physical activity. Office workers ( = 263) were cluster randomized into one of two 6-month intervention groups, or a control group. Time spent in sedentary behavior, light-intensity, moderate and vigorous physical activity, and time in bed were assessed using accelerometers and diaries, both for 24 h in total, and for work and leisure time separately. Cardiorespiratory fitness was estimated using a sub-maximal cycle ergometer test. Intervention effects were analyzed using linear mixed models. No intervention effects were found, either for 24-h behaviors in total, or for work and leisure time behaviors separately. Cardiorespiratory fitness did not change significantly. Despite a thorough analysis of 24-h behaviors using CoDA, no intervention effects were found, neither for behaviors in total, nor for work and leisure time behaviors separately. Cardiorespiratory fitness did not change significantly. Although the design of the multi-component interventions was based on theoretical frameworks, and included cognitive behavioral therapy counselling, which has been proven effective in other populations, issues related to implementation of and compliance with some intervention components may have led to the observed lack of intervention effect.
干预研究旨在改变运动行为,但通常没有考虑到时间使用数据的组成性质。组成数据分析(CoDA)已被提议作为分析此类数据的有用策略。本研究的目的是检查两种多成分干预措施对办公室工作人员 24 小时运动行为(使用 CoDA)和心肺功能的影响;一种侧重于减少久坐行为,另一种侧重于增加身体活动。办公室工作人员(n=263)被聚类随机分为两个 6 个月干预组之一或对照组。使用加速度计和日记记录了 24 小时内的久坐行为、低强度、中等强度和高强度身体活动以及卧床时间,总共 24 小时,并分别记录了工作和休闲时间。心肺功能使用亚最大循环测力计测试进行估计。使用线性混合模型分析干预效果。无论是在总 24 小时行为还是在工作和休闲时间行为中,都没有发现干预效果。心肺功能没有显著变化。尽管使用 CoDA 对 24 小时行为进行了全面分析,但无论是在总行为中,还是在工作和休闲时间行为中,都没有发现干预效果。心肺功能没有显著变化。尽管多成分干预的设计基于理论框架,并包括已被证明在其他人群中有效的认知行为疗法咨询,但与一些干预成分的实施和遵守相关的问题可能导致了观察到的缺乏干预效果。