• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验性可钻磷酸镁骨水泥是传统骨水泥的一种有前景的替代品。

Experimental Drillable Magnesium Phosphate Cement Is a Promising Alternative to Conventional Bone Cements.

作者信息

Heilig Philipp, Sandner Phoebe, Jordan Martin Cornelius, Jakubietz Rafael Gregor, Meffert Rainer Heribert, Gbureck Uwe, Hoelscher-Doht Stefanie

机构信息

Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstraße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.

Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 12;14(8):1925. doi: 10.3390/ma14081925.

DOI:10.3390/ma14081925
PMID:33921373
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8069694/
Abstract

Clinically used mineral bone cements lack high strength values, absorbability and drillability. Therefore, magnesium phosphate cements have recently received increasing attention as they unify a high mechanical performance with presumed degradation in vivo. To obtain a drillable cement formulation, farringtonite (Mg(PO)) and magnesium oxide (MgO) were modified with the setting retardant phytic acid (CHOP). In a pre-testing series, 13 different compositions of magnesium phosphate cements were analyzed concentrating on the clinical demands for application. Of these 13 composites, two cement formulations with different phytic acid content (22.5 wt% and 25 wt%) were identified to meet clinical demands. Both formulations were evaluated in terms of setting time, injectability, compressive strength, screw pullout tests and biomechanical tests in a clinically relevant fracture model. The cements were used as bone filler of a metaphyseal bone defect alone, and in combination with screws drilled through the cement. Both formulations achieved a setting time of 5 min 30 s and an injectability of 100%. Compressive strength was shown to be ~12-13 MPa and the overall displacement of the reduced fracture was <2 mm with and without screws. Maximum load until reduced fracture failure was ~2600 N for the cements only and ~3800 N for the combination with screws. Two new compositions of magnesium phosphate cements revealed high strength in clinically relevant biomechanical test set-ups and add clinically desired characteristics to its strength such as injectability and drillability.

摘要

临床使用的矿物骨水泥缺乏高强度值、可吸收性和可钻性。因此,磷酸镁水泥最近受到越来越多的关注,因为它们兼具高机械性能和体内假定的降解性。为了获得可钻性水泥配方,用缓凝剂植酸(C₆H₁₈O₂₄P₆)对镁橄榄石(Mg₂SiO₄)和氧化镁(MgO)进行了改性。在一个预测试系列中,分析了13种不同成分的磷酸镁水泥,重点关注临床应用需求。在这13种复合材料中,确定了两种不同植酸含量(22.5 wt%和25 wt%)的水泥配方符合临床需求。在临床相关骨折模型中,对这两种配方的凝固时间、可注射性、抗压强度、螺钉拔出试验和生物力学试验进行了评估。这些水泥单独用作干骺端骨缺损的骨填充材料,并与穿过水泥钻出的螺钉联合使用。两种配方的凝固时间均为5分30秒,可注射性均为100%。抗压强度显示约为12 - 13 MPa,无论有无螺钉,骨折复位后的总位移均<2 mm。仅使用水泥时,骨折复位失败前的最大载荷约为2600 N,与螺钉联合使用时约为3800 N。两种新的磷酸镁水泥配方在临床相关生物力学试验设置中显示出高强度,并为其强度增添了临床所需的特性,如可注射性和可钻性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/9d04e1d88911/materials-14-01925-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/b311c408c7eb/materials-14-01925-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/578632d79da1/materials-14-01925-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/f18b81fefe45/materials-14-01925-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/c8318d096072/materials-14-01925-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/e815d853b0f9/materials-14-01925-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/1233e32978b8/materials-14-01925-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/06f6dfefc0b7/materials-14-01925-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/89871d6caa8d/materials-14-01925-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/d33dc25d8696/materials-14-01925-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/6bb821e297af/materials-14-01925-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/ed1d72e3169a/materials-14-01925-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/ef2cd597f1bd/materials-14-01925-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/fc6bfb2dce70/materials-14-01925-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/046bb249c26c/materials-14-01925-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/b2877cab5b95/materials-14-01925-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/dd9c7167da0c/materials-14-01925-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/9d04e1d88911/materials-14-01925-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/b311c408c7eb/materials-14-01925-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/578632d79da1/materials-14-01925-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/f18b81fefe45/materials-14-01925-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/c8318d096072/materials-14-01925-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/e815d853b0f9/materials-14-01925-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/1233e32978b8/materials-14-01925-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/06f6dfefc0b7/materials-14-01925-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/89871d6caa8d/materials-14-01925-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/d33dc25d8696/materials-14-01925-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/6bb821e297af/materials-14-01925-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/ed1d72e3169a/materials-14-01925-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/ef2cd597f1bd/materials-14-01925-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/fc6bfb2dce70/materials-14-01925-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/046bb249c26c/materials-14-01925-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/b2877cab5b95/materials-14-01925-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/dd9c7167da0c/materials-14-01925-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b7/8069694/9d04e1d88911/materials-14-01925-g017.jpg

相似文献

1
Experimental Drillable Magnesium Phosphate Cement Is a Promising Alternative to Conventional Bone Cements.实验性可钻磷酸镁骨水泥是传统骨水泥的一种有前景的替代品。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 12;14(8):1925. doi: 10.3390/ma14081925.
2
Degradation and Bone-Contact Biocompatibility of Two Drillable Magnesium Phosphate Bone Cements in an In Vivo Rabbit Bone Defect Model.两种可钻孔磷酸镁骨水泥在兔体内骨缺损模型中的降解及骨接触生物相容性
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;16(13):4650. doi: 10.3390/ma16134650.
3
Augmentation of suture anchors with magnesium phosphate cement - Simple technique with striking effect.镁磷灰石水泥增强缝合锚钉 - 简单技术,显著效果。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022 Apr;128:105096. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105096. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
4
Bone substitute first or screws first? A biomechanical comparison of two operative techniques for tibial-head depression fractures.先植入骨替代物还是先拧入螺钉?胫骨平台塌陷骨折两种手术技术的生物力学比较。
J Orthop Sci. 2014 Nov;19(6):978-83. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0613-4. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
5
Magnesium Phosphate Cement as Mineral Bone Adhesive.磷酸镁水泥作为矿物骨黏合剂
Materials (Basel). 2019 Nov 21;12(23):3819. doi: 10.3390/ma12233819.
6
Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method.使用可注射磷酸钙骨水泥增强椎弓根螺钉固定强度与注射时机和方法的关系。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jun 1;29(11):E212-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200406010-00020.
7
Biomechanical Evaluation of Promising Different Bone Substitutes in a Clinically Relevant Test Set-Up.在临床相关测试设置中对多种有前景的骨替代物进行生物力学评估。
Materials (Basel). 2019 Apr 26;12(9):1364. doi: 10.3390/ma12091364.
8
Exploring the potential of magnesium oxychloride, an amorphous magnesium phosphate, and newberyite as possible bone cement candidates.探索氧氯化镁、无定形磷酸镁和新拜尔石作为潜在骨水泥候选材料的可能性。
J Biomater Appl. 2023 Sep;38(3):438-454. doi: 10.1177/08853282231190908. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
9
Bone regeneration capacity of magnesium phosphate cements in a large animal model.大型动物模型中磷酸镁水泥的骨再生能力。
Acta Biomater. 2018 Mar 15;69:352-361. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.035. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
10
Hydration mechanism of a calcium phosphate cement modified with phytic acid.植酸改性磷酸钙骨水泥的水化机制。
Acta Biomater. 2018 Oct 15;80:378-389. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Bone filler and adhesive at the same time: in-vitro analysis in a porcine fracture model.骨填充剂与粘合剂兼具:猪骨折模型的体外分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 27;26(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08773-y.
2
Biomechanical Performance and Handling of Mineral-Organic Adhesive Bone Cements Based on Magnesium Under Clinical Test Conditions.基于镁的矿物有机粘结骨水泥在临床试验条件下的生物力学性能与操作性
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 29;14(9):3081. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093081.
3
An Overview of Magnesium-Phosphate-Based Cements as Bone Repair Materials.

本文引用的文献

1
Magnesium Phosphate Cement as Mineral Bone Adhesive.磷酸镁水泥作为矿物骨黏合剂
Materials (Basel). 2019 Nov 21;12(23):3819. doi: 10.3390/ma12233819.
2
Augmented Fixation for Fractures of the Appendicular Skeleton.四肢骨折的增强固定。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Nov 15;27(22):823-833. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00471.
3
Biomechanical Evaluation of Promising Different Bone Substitutes in a Clinically Relevant Test Set-Up.在临床相关测试设置中对多种有前景的骨替代物进行生物力学评估。
基于磷酸镁的骨修复材料概述
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Aug 14;14(8):424. doi: 10.3390/jfb14080424.
4
Degradation and Bone-Contact Biocompatibility of Two Drillable Magnesium Phosphate Bone Cements in an In Vivo Rabbit Bone Defect Model.两种可钻孔磷酸镁骨水泥在兔体内骨缺损模型中的降解及骨接触生物相容性
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;16(13):4650. doi: 10.3390/ma16134650.
5
Hydration Behavior of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement: Experimental Study and Thermodynamic Modeling.磷酸镁钾水泥的水化行为:实验研究与热力学建模
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;15(23):8496. doi: 10.3390/ma15238496.
Materials (Basel). 2019 Apr 26;12(9):1364. doi: 10.3390/ma12091364.
4
Hydration mechanism of a calcium phosphate cement modified with phytic acid.植酸改性磷酸钙骨水泥的水化机制。
Acta Biomater. 2018 Oct 15;80:378-389. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
5
Bone regeneration capacity of magnesium phosphate cements in a large animal model.大型动物模型中磷酸镁水泥的骨再生能力。
Acta Biomater. 2018 Mar 15;69:352-361. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.035. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
Phytic acid as alternative setting retarder enhanced biological performance of dicalcium phosphate cement in vitro.植酸作为替代凝固延缓剂增强了磷酸氢钙水泥的体外生物学性能。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 3;7(1):558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00731-6.
7
Biomechanical analysis of different osteosyntheses and the combination with bone substitute in tibial head depression fractures.胫骨平台塌陷骨折不同接骨术及联合骨替代物的生物力学分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 15;17:287. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1118-4.
8
Bone substitute first or screws first? A biomechanical comparison of two operative techniques for tibial-head depression fractures.先植入骨替代物还是先拧入螺钉?胫骨平台塌陷骨折两种手术技术的生物力学比较。
J Orthop Sci. 2014 Nov;19(6):978-83. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0613-4. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
9
Control of in vivo mineral bone cement degradation.体内矿化骨水泥降解的控制。
Acta Biomater. 2014 Jul;10(7):3279-87. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.020. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
10
Magnesium phosphate cements for endodontic applications with improved long-term sealing ability.用于牙髓治疗的具有改善的长期密封能力的磷酸镁水泥。
Int Endod J. 2014 Feb;47(2):127-39. doi: 10.1111/iej.12123. Epub 2013 May 3.