Bud Eugen S, Bocanet Vlad I, Muntean Mircea H, Vlasa Alexandru, Bucur Sorana M, Păcurar Mariana, Dragomir Bogdan R, Olteanu Cristian D, Bud Anamaria
Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Science and Technology George Emil Palade, 540139 Târgu-Mureș, Romania.
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 28;10(9):1908. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091908.
Digital impression devices are used alternatively to conventional impression techniques and materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of extraoral digitalization of three types of photosensitive resin polymers used for 3D printing with the aid of a digital extraoral optical scanner. The alignment of the scans was performed by a standard best-fit alignment. Trueness and precision were used to evaluate the models. The trueness was evaluated by using bias as a measure and the standard deviation was used to evaluate the precision. After assessing the normality of the distributions, an independent Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the trueness and precision across the material groups. The Mann-Whitney test was used as a post-hoc test for significant differences. The result of the analysis showed significant differences (U = 66, z = -2.337, = 0.019) in trueness of mesiodistal distances. Upon visual inspection of the models, defects were noticed on two out of nine of the models printed with a photosensitive polymer. The defects were presented as cavities caused by air bubbles and were also reflected in the scans. Mean precision did not vary too much between these three photosensitive polymer resins, therefore, the selection of 3D printing materials should be based on the trueness and the required precision of the clinical purpose of the model.
数字印模设备可替代传统的印模技术和材料使用。本研究的目的是借助数字口外光学扫描仪评估用于3D打印的三种类型光敏树脂聚合物的口外数字化精度。扫描的对齐通过标准最佳拟合对齐进行。用准确性和精度来评估模型。准确性通过偏差作为衡量标准进行评估,标准差用于评估精度。在评估分布的正态性之后,使用独立的Kruskal-Wallis检验来比较不同材料组之间的准确性和精度。Mann-Whitney检验用作事后检验以检测显著差异。分析结果显示近远中距离的准确性存在显著差异(U = 66,z = -2.337,P = 0.019)。在对模型进行目视检查时,在用光敏聚合物打印的九个模型中有两个发现了缺陷。这些缺陷表现为由气泡引起的空洞,并且在扫描中也有体现。这三种光敏聚合物树脂之间的平均精度差异不大,因此,3D打印材料的选择应基于模型临床用途的准确性和所需精度。