Thery Laura, Vaflard Pauline, Vuagnat Perrine, Soulie Ophélie, Dolbeault Sylvie, Burnod Alexis, Laouisset Céline, Marchal Timothée, Massiani Marie-Ange, Bozec Laurence, Bidard François-Clément, Cottu Paul, Angellier Elisabeth, Bouleuc Carole
Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, Institut Curie, Paris et Saint-Cloud, France.
PSL University, Paris, France.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Apr 29. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002946.
In managing patients with cancer in the COVID-19 era, clinical oncologists and palliative care practitioners had to face new, disrupting and complex medical situations, challenging the quality of the shared decision-making process. During the first lockdown in France, we developed an onco-palliative ethics meeting to enhance the quality of the decision-making process for patients with advanced cancer treated for COVID-19.
A least one of the institutional ethics committee members was present along with oncologists, palliative care teams, psycho-oncologists, radiologists and intensive care specialists. Specific medical parameters were systematically collected to form a standardised framework for the discussions.
The main raised issues were the definition of new criteria for the implementation of invasive resuscitation techniques, optimal ways to adapt or delay anticancer treatment and best procedures to address terminal respiratory failure and end-of-life care. The main clinical and ethical guidelines that emerged during these debates are presented. The palliative care team played a major role in assessing and reporting patients' awareness of cancer-related prognosis and their wishes concerning invasive therapies or transfer to intensive care units, enabling an individualised benefit-risk balance assessment. The ethics committee members ensured continuous monitoring during the discussions. Their function was to recall the main ethical principles including dignity, which is conferred on people when there are treated as having equal status.
The onco-palliative ethics meeting provided a powerful avenue for improvement of collegiality and reinforcement of teamwork, which could be a major protection against burnout for healthcare professionals facing an epidemic onslaught.
在新冠疫情时代管理癌症患者时,临床肿瘤学家和姑息治疗从业者不得不面对新的、具有破坏性且复杂的医疗状况,这对共同决策过程的质量构成了挑战。在法国首次封锁期间,我们组织了一次肿瘤姑息治疗伦理会议,以提高因新冠接受治疗的晚期癌症患者决策过程的质量。
机构伦理委员会至少有一名成员与肿瘤学家、姑息治疗团队、心理肿瘤学家、放射科医生和重症监护专家一同出席。系统收集特定医学参数,以形成讨论的标准化框架。
主要提出的问题包括实施侵入性复苏技术的新标准定义、调整或延迟抗癌治疗的最佳方法以及应对终末期呼吸衰竭和临终关怀的最佳程序。介绍了这些辩论中出现的主要临床和伦理指南。姑息治疗团队在评估和报告患者对癌症相关预后的认知以及他们对侵入性治疗或转至重症监护病房的意愿方面发挥了主要作用,从而能够进行个体化的利弊平衡评估。伦理委员会成员在讨论期间确保持续监督。他们的职责是重申包括尊严在内的主要伦理原则,尊严是在人们被平等对待时赋予他们的。
肿瘤姑息治疗伦理会议为增进合议性和加强团队合作提供了有力途径,这对于面临疫情冲击的医护人员而言可能是预防职业倦怠的重要保障。