Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Jan 12;5. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00372. eCollection 2021.
This trial assessed the utility of applying tumor DNA sequencing to treatment selection for patients with advanced, refractory cancer and somatic mutations in one of four signaling pathways by comparing the efficacy of four study regimens that were either matched to the patient's aberrant pathway (experimental arm) or not matched to that pathway (control arm).
Adult patients with an actionable mutation of interest were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either (1) a study regimen identified to target the aberrant pathway found in their tumor (veliparib with temozolomide or adavosertib with carboplatin [DNA repair pathway], everolimus [PI3K pathway], or trametinib [RAS/RAF/MEK pathway]), or (2) one of the same four regimens, but chosen from among those not targeting that pathway.
Among 49 patients treated in the experimental arm, the objective response rate was 2% (95% CI, 0% to 10.9%). One of 20 patients (5%) in the experimental trametinib cohort had a partial response. There were no responses in the other cohorts. Although patients and physicians were blinded to the sequencing and random assignment results, a higher pretreatment dropout rate was observed in the control arm (22%) compared with the experimental arm (6%; = .038), suggesting that some patients may have had prior tumor mutation profiling performed that led to a lack of participation in the control arm.
Further investigation, better annotation of predictive biomarkers, and the development of more effective agents are necessary to inform treatment decisions in an era of precision cancer medicine. Increasing prevalence of tumor mutation profiling and preference for targeted therapy make it difficult to use a randomized phase II design to evaluate targeted therapy efficacy in an advanced disease setting.
本试验评估了应用肿瘤 DNA 测序来选择治疗方案的效用,方法是将四种信号通路之一的体细胞突变患者的疗效与四种研究方案进行比较,这些方案要么与患者的异常通路相匹配(实验组),要么与该通路不匹配(对照组)。
有靶向治疗意义的突变的成年患者被随机分配 2:1 接受以下治疗之一:(1)选择针对肿瘤中发现的异常通路的研究方案(维帕利布联合替莫唑胺或阿伐斯替布联合卡铂[DNA 修复通路],依维莫司[PI3K 通路]或曲美替尼[RAS/RAF/MEK 通路]);或(2)从非靶向该通路的相同四种方案中选择一种。
在实验组的 49 名患者中,客观缓解率为 2%(95%CI,0%至 10.9%)。实验组的 20 名患者中有 1 名(5%)接受曲美替尼治疗的患者出现部分缓解。其他队列均无缓解。尽管患者和医生对测序和随机分组结果均不知情,但对照组的预处理脱落率(22%)高于实验组(6%; =.038),表明一些患者可能已经进行了肿瘤突变分析,因此未参加对照组的治疗。
在精准肿瘤医学时代,为了提供治疗决策,需要进一步研究,更好地注释预测生物标志物,并开发更有效的药物。肿瘤突变分析的普遍出现和对靶向治疗的偏好使得在晚期疾病环境中使用随机二期设计来评估靶向治疗的疗效变得困难。