Evrard Yvonne A, Alcoser Sergio Y, Mullendore Michael, Chen Li, Lih Chih-Jian, Kannan Vishnuprabha Rahul, Datta Vivekananda, Dutko Lindsay, Jiwani Shahanawaz, Rubinstein Lawrence V, Zhao Yingdong, Williams P Mickey, Palmisano Alida, Kuhlmann Laura, Simpson Mel, Kummar Shivaani, Das Biswajit, Karlovich Chris, Polley Eric, Li Ming-Chung, Chen Alice P, Hollingshead Melinda G, Doroshow James H
Applied and Developmental Research Directorate (ADRD), Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, United States.
Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Front Oncol. 2025 May 19;15:1571635. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1571635. eCollection 2025.
The National Cancer Institute's Molecular Profiling-Based Assignment of Cancer Therapy (NCI-MPACT) randomized phase 2 clinical trial assessed the utility of applying tumor DNA sequencing to treatment selection. Here, we report the results of a companion preclinical study in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models to evaluate how each tumor responded to each of the treatment regimens studied in the NCI-MPACT trial instead of simply to the specific regimen targeting the study-actionable mutation of interest (aMOI).
Fifty-one PDX models (46 with and 5 without NCI-MPACT aMOIs) were tested against both the arm that would have been assigned in the NCI-MPACT trial as well as every other study regimen: (1) veliparib plus temozolomide or (2) adavosertib plus carboplatin (targeting the DNA repair pathway); (3) everolimus (targeting the PI3K pathway); and (4) trametinib (targeting the RAS/RAF/MEK pathway). Durability of response was measured by relative median time to tumor quadrupling event-free survival (EFSx4 ≥ 2), and duration of tumor regression.
Eleven of 50 models (22%) treated with veliparib plus temozolomide responded according to one or both metrics, as did 2/47 models (4.2%) treated with adavosertib plus carboplatin, and 2/46 models (4.3%) treated with trametinib; no models responded to erlotinib. Follow-up studies demonstrated that temozolomide drove the activity of the veliparib plus temozolomide combination and drug sensitivity to temozolomide correlated with MGMT deficiency.
This prospective preclinical study confirmed the modest response rates in the NCI-MPACT clinical trial. Substantial responses to temozolomide suggest that this drug represents an effective treatment for patients with MGMT deficiency, regardless of cancer type.
美国国立癌症研究所基于分子谱分析的癌症治疗分配(NCI-MPACT)随机2期临床试验评估了应用肿瘤DNA测序进行治疗选择的效用。在此,我们报告一项在患者来源异种移植(PDX)模型中进行的配套临床前研究结果,以评估每个肿瘤对NCI-MPACT试验中研究的每种治疗方案的反应,而不是简单地对针对感兴趣的研究可行突变(aMOI)的特定方案的反应。
51个PDX模型(46个有和5个没有NCI-MPACT的aMOI)针对NCI-MPACT试验中分配的治疗组以及其他每种研究方案进行测试:(1)维利帕尼加替莫唑胺或(2)阿多福韦加卡铂(靶向DNA修复途径);(3)依维莫司(靶向PI3K途径);以及(4)曲美替尼(靶向RAS/RAF/MEK途径)。通过相对中位无肿瘤四倍增长事件生存期(EFSx4≥2)和肿瘤消退持续时间来衡量反应的持久性。
50个模型中有11个(22%)接受维利帕尼加替莫唑胺治疗后根据一项或两项指标有反应,47个模型中有2个(4.2%)接受阿多福韦加卡铂治疗后有反应,46个模型中有2个(4.3%)接受曲美替尼治疗后有反应;没有模型对厄洛替尼有反应。后续研究表明替莫唑胺驱动了维利帕尼加替莫唑胺联合治疗的活性,并且对替莫唑胺的药物敏感性与MGMT缺陷相关。
这项前瞻性临床前研究证实了NCI-MPACT临床试验中的适度反应率。对替莫唑胺的显著反应表明,无论癌症类型如何,该药物对MGMT缺陷患者是一种有效的治疗方法。