Siu Adrian H Y, Carey Sharon, Jones Lynn, Morton Rachael L, Koh Cherry E
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022 Mar;46(3):685-692. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2136. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is the recommended treatment for patients with type III intestinal failure (IF). However, owing to IF's rarity, the economic cost of managing these patients is not well understood. These patients often develop complications resulting in readmissions, which in turn contribute to ongoing costs. This study aims to document the costs of type III IF within the hospital, from initial admission, including readmissions, and to compare incurred costs with current government reimbursement.
A retrospective study design reviewed costs and reimbursement for 25 consecutive patients commencing HPN at a quaternary hospital (October 2011 to September 2017). Hospital admissions were separated into the initial admission and readmission(s) period. Healthcare use and cost data were collected using electronic medical records. Hospital reimbursement costs were retrieved from Sydney Local Health District's Targeted Activity and Reporting Systems. Patient demographics were tabulated, and healthcare use and cost data were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.
The median cost of the initial hospital admission was substantially higher than the median reimbursement ($36,675; interquartile range [IQR], $23,196-$67,439 vs $19,247; IQR, $7485-$41,090; P < .001). Similar results were observed in the readmissions period, with median incurred costs of $13,898; (IQR, $11,151-$32,130) vs reimbursement of $8469 (IQR, $5625-$13,078) (P = .001).
Results indicate that type III IF patients have high inpatient costs, which substantially outweigh current reimbursement. Improved funding models are needed to ensure hospitals that accept the management challenge of type III IF patients are not unduly penalized.
家庭肠外营养(HPN)是III型肠衰竭(IF)患者的推荐治疗方法。然而,由于IF较为罕见,管理这些患者的经济成本尚不清楚。这些患者常出现并发症导致再次入院,进而增加持续成本。本研究旨在记录III型IF患者从首次入院(包括再次入院)起在医院内的费用,并将所产生的费用与当前政府报销情况进行比较。
采用回顾性研究设计,对一家四级医院(2011年10月至2017年9月)开始接受HPN治疗的25例连续患者的费用和报销情况进行审查。医院入院分为首次入院和再次入院期。使用电子病历收集医疗使用和成本数据。从悉尼地方卫生区的目标活动和报告系统中获取医院报销费用。将患者人口统计学数据制成表格,并使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较医疗使用和成本数据。
首次住院的中位费用显著高于中位报销费用(36,675美元;四分位间距[IQR],23,196 - 67,439美元对19,247美元;IQR,7485 - 41,090美元;P <.001)。在再次入院期也观察到类似结果,中位产生费用为13,898美元;(IQR,11,151 - 32,130美元)对报销费用8469美元(IQR,5625 - 13,078美元)(P =.001)。
结果表明,III型IF患者住院费用高昂,大大超过当前报销金额。需要改进资金模式,以确保接受管理III型IF患者挑战的医院不会受到过度惩罚。