• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别、年龄和种族对糖尿病合并急性冠脉综合征患者的冠脉和心力衰竭事件的影响。

Influence of sex, age and race on coronary and heart failure events in patients with diabetes and post-acute coronary syndrome.

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Spain.

Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Oct;110(10):1612-1624. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01859-2. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00392-021-01859-2
PMID:33929598
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women, older patients and non-White ethnic groups experience a substantial proportion of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), although they have been historically underrepresented in ACS randomized clinical trials (RCTs). To assess the influence of sex, age and race on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and on heart failure events, we studied patients with type 2 diabetes in a large post-ACS trial (EXAMINE).

METHODS

Differences in baseline characteristics and the respective composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (MACE) and cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (HF events) were evaluated by subgroups in a cohort of post-ACS patients with diabetes, using unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression modelling.

RESULTS

The EXAMINE trial enrolled 5380 patients with 35% aged > 65, 32% female and 27% non-White. The risk of MACE was higher in non-White compared to White patients after adjustment for potential confounding (HR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.04-1.75), but there were no significant differences by sex and age (HR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.87-1.22 for women; HR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.96-1.35 for patients ≥ 65 years). The risk of HF events was higher in non-White patients (HR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.13-2.14), and in patients aged > 65 (HR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.07-1.66) and nominally so in women (HR = 1.23; 95% CI 0.99-1.52). The additive risk of each demographic factor (women, older age and non-White race) was greater for HF events in comparison with MACE. Moreover, non-White elderly patients consistently had poorer prognosis regardless of sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults, women and non-White patients with diabetes who are post-ACS are often underrepresented in RCTs. The risk for HF events was higher in older and non-White patients, with a trend towards significance in women, whereas only non-White patients (and not women and older patients) were at higher risk for MACE. Future trials should enrich enrollment of these persons at risk.

摘要

背景

女性、老年患者和非白种人群体在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)中占很大比例,尽管他们在 ACS 随机临床试验(RCT)中历来代表性不足。为了评估性别、年龄和种族对主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和心力衰竭事件的影响,我们在一项大型 ACS 后试验(EXAMINE)中研究了 2 型糖尿病患者。

方法

使用未经调整和调整后的 Cox 回归模型,根据亚组评估了 ACS 后糖尿病患者队列的基线特征和心血管死亡、非致命性心肌梗死或非致命性卒中(MACE)以及心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院(HF 事件)的复合终点差异。

结果

EXAMINE 试验纳入了 5380 名患者,其中 35%年龄>65 岁,32%为女性,27%为非白种人。在调整潜在混杂因素后,非白种人发生 MACE 的风险高于白种人(HR=1.35;95%CI 1.04-1.75),但性别和年龄无显著差异(HR=1.03;95%CI 0.87-1.22 为女性;HR=1.14;95%CI 0.96-1.35 为年龄≥65 岁患者)。非白种人患者发生 HF 事件的风险更高(HR=1.56;95%CI 1.13-2.14),年龄>65 岁的患者风险更高(HR=1.33;95%CI 1.07-1.66),女性风险略高(HR=1.23;95%CI 0.99-1.52)。与 MACE 相比,每个人口统计学因素(女性、年龄较大和非白种人种族)的附加风险对 HF 事件的影响更大。此外,无论性别如何,年龄较大的非白种人 ACS 后患者的预后均较差。

结论

ACS 后患有糖尿病的老年患者、女性和非白种人在 RCT 中往往代表性不足。年龄较大和非白种人患者发生 HF 事件的风险更高,女性患者有发生趋势,但只有非白种人患者(而非女性和老年患者)发生 MACE 的风险更高。未来的试验应增加这些高危人群的入组。

相似文献

1
Influence of sex, age and race on coronary and heart failure events in patients with diabetes and post-acute coronary syndrome.性别、年龄和种族对糖尿病合并急性冠脉综合征患者的冠脉和心力衰竭事件的影响。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Oct;110(10):1612-1624. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01859-2. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
2
Occurence of First and Recurrent Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events With Liraglutide Treatment Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and High Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.利拉鲁肽治疗伴心血管事件高危因素 2 型糖尿病患者的首次和复发主要不良心血管事件的发生:一项随机临床试验的事后分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Dec 1;4(12):1214-1220. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3080.
3
Association of Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 With Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in Patients After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.成纤维细胞生长因子 23 与急性冠状动脉综合征后患者复发性心血管事件的相关性:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jun 1;3(6):473-480. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0653.
4
Body mass index and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome by diabetes status: the obesity paradox in a Korean national cohort study.按糖尿病状态分层的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的体重指数与心血管结局:韩国全国队列研究中的肥胖悖论。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Nov 10;19(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01170-w.
5
Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Previous Myocardial Infarction.达格列净与既往心肌梗死的 2 型糖尿病患者的心血管结局
Circulation. 2019 May 28;139(22):2516-2527. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.039996. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
6
WBC count predicts heart failure in diabetes and coronary artery disease patients: a retrospective cohort study.白细胞计数可预测糖尿病合并冠心病患者的心力衰竭:一项回顾性队列研究。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;8(5):3748-3759. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13513. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
7
First-Ever Ischemic Stroke and Incident Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in 93 627 Older Women and Men.93627 名老年女性和男性中首例缺血性中风和主要不良心血管事件。
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):387-394. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028066. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Aldosterone Does Not Predict Cardiovascular Events Following Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients Initially Without Heart Failure.醛固酮不能预测初始无心力衰竭的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的心血管事件。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jan 10;6(1):e004119. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004119.
9
Heart failure and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes taking alogliptin versus placebo in EXAMINE: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial.在 EXAMINE 研究中,比较阿格列汀与安慰剂治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的心力衰竭和死亡率结局:一项多中心、随机、双盲试验。
Lancet. 2015 May 23;385(9982):2067-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62225-X. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
10
Relation of Serum and Urine Renal Biomarkers to Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Recent Acute Coronary Syndromes (From the EXAMINE Trial).血清和尿液肾生物标志物与近期急性冠状动脉综合征的 2 型糖尿病患者心血管风险的关系(来自 EXAMINE 试验)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Feb 1;123(3):382-391. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.10.035. Epub 2018 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Coronary Syndrome Presenting during On- and Off-Hours: Is There a Difference in a Tertiary Cardiovascular Center?急性冠状动脉综合征在工作时间和非工作时间就诊:在三级心血管中心有区别吗?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 4;59(8):1420. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081420.
2
Nomogram to predict the incidence of new-onset heart failure after acute coronary syndrome among women.预测急性冠状动脉综合征后女性新发心力衰竭发生率的列线图。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 24;10:1131813. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1131813. eCollection 2023.
3
Representativeness in randomised clinical trials supporting acute coronary syndrome guidelines.

本文引用的文献

1
Diversity is richness: why data reporting according to sex, age, and ethnicity matters.多样性即丰富性:为何按性别、年龄和种族进行数据报告至关重要。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Sep 1;41(33):3117-3121. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa277.
2
Enrollment of Older Patients, Women, and Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups in Contemporary Acute Coronary Syndrome Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.当代急性冠状动脉综合征临床试验中老年患者、女性和种族/少数民族群体的入组情况:一项系统评价。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):714-722. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0359.
3
Sex differences in mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist trials: a pooled analysis of three large clinical trials.
支持急性冠状动脉综合征指南的随机临床试验中的代表性。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Dec 22;9(8):796-805. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad007.
4
Serum VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 measurement assists for MACE risk estimation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.血清 VCAM-1 和 ICAM-1 测量有助于评估 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的 MACR 风险。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Oct;36(10):e24685. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24685. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
5
The role of blood CXCL12 level in prognosis of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.血液CXCL12水平在冠状动脉疾病预后中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 27;9:938540. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.938540. eCollection 2022.
6
Sex differences following percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后的性别差异。
Biol Sex Differ. 2022 Apr 27;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13293-022-00427-1.
盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂试验中的性别差异:三项大型临床试验的汇总分析
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 May;22(5):834-844. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1740. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
MRAs in Elderly HF Patients: Individual Patient-Data Meta-Analysis of RALES, EMPHASIS-HF, and TOPCAT.老年 HF 患者中的 MRA:RALES、EMPHASIS-HF 和 TOPCAT 的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Dec;7(12):1012-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.08.017.
5
Effect of Linagliptin vs Glimepiride on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The CAROLINA Randomized Clinical Trial.利格列汀与格列美脲对2型糖尿病患者主要不良心血管结局的影响:卡罗来纳州随机临床试验
JAMA. 2019 Sep 24;322(12):1155-1166. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13772.
6
2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD.2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)合作制定的糖尿病、糖尿病前期和心血管疾病指南。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 7;41(2):255-323. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486.
7
Identifying optimal doses of heart failure medications in men compared with women: a prospective, observational, cohort study.比较男性和女性心力衰竭药物的最佳剂量:一项前瞻性、观察性、队列研究。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1254-1263. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31792-1. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
8
Effect of Dapagliflozin on Heart Failure and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.达格列净对 2 型糖尿病心力衰竭和死亡的影响。
Circulation. 2019 May 28;139(22):2528-2536. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040130. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
Comparison of the Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.比较胰高血糖素样肽受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在 2 型糖尿病患者预防主要不良心血管和肾脏结局的效果。
Circulation. 2019 Apr 23;139(17):2022-2031. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038868.
10
Effect of Linagliptin vs Placebo on Major Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and High Cardiovascular and Renal Risk: The CARMELINA Randomized Clinical Trial.利拉利汀对比安慰剂对伴有高心血管和肾脏风险的 2 型糖尿病成人患者主要心血管事件的影响:CARMELINA 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jan 1;321(1):69-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18269.