Suppr超能文献

提高服务参与度,以预防有发生重大伤害风险儿童的家庭中的婴儿猝死综合征 (SUDI):对证据的系统回顾。

Improving engagement with services to prevent Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI) in families with children at risk of significant harm: A systematic review of evidence.

机构信息

Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust and Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Children and Families Research Centre, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Child Care Health Dev. 2021 Sep;47(5):713-731. doi: 10.1111/cch.12875. Epub 2021 May 12.

Abstract

This paper reports part of a wider systematic review commissioned by the English National Safeguarding Panel on Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI). The wider review covered three areas: interventions to improve safer sleep practices in high-risk families, interventions to improve engagement with services and decision making by parents at high risk of SUDI about infant sleep environments. Here, we report the qualitative and quantitative studies reviewed under the engagement strand. Parental engagement is understood to be a multidimensional task for health and social care professionals comprising attitudinal, relational and behavioural components. Following a PROSPERO registered systematic review synthesizing the three strands outlined, 28 papers were found to be relevant in the review of interventions to improve engagement with services in families with children at risk of significant harm through abuse or neglect. No studies were found that specifically focused on engagement of families at high risk for SUDI, so these wider engagement studies were included. The different types of intervention reported in the included studies are described under two broad themes: Enablers (including parental motivation and working with families) and Barriers. Given the focus in the studies on interventions that support parental engagement, the Enablers theme is more extensive than the Barriers reported although all studies noted well-understood barriers. The evidence underpinning these interventions and approaches are reviewed in this paper. We conclude that effective engagement is facilitated by experienced professionals given time to develop supportive non-judgemental relationships with families in their homes, working long-term, linking with communities and other services. While these conclusions have been drawn from wider studies aimed at reducing child maltreatment, we emphasize lessons to be drawn for SUDI prevention work with families with children at risk of significant harm.

摘要

本文报告了英格兰婴儿猝死国家保障小组委托进行的更广泛系统评价的一部分内容。该更广泛的评价涵盖了三个领域:改善高风险家庭中更安全睡眠实践的干预措施、改善有婴儿睡眠环境风险的父母与服务机构互动和决策的干预措施。在这里,我们报告了在互动部分中审查的定性和定量研究。父母的参与被理解为卫生和社会保健专业人员的一项多维度任务,包括态度、关系和行为组成部分。在对概述的三个方面进行 PROSPERO 注册的系统评价综合之后,发现了 28 篇与改善有遭受虐待或忽视风险的儿童的家庭对服务的参与度相关的干预措施的评价相关的论文。没有发现专门针对婴儿猝死风险高的家庭参与度的研究,因此纳入了这些更广泛的参与度研究。纳入研究报告的不同类型的干预措施在两个广泛的主题下进行了描述:促进因素(包括父母的动机和与家庭合作)和障碍。鉴于研究的重点是支持父母参与的干预措施,因此促进因素主题比报告的障碍更为广泛,尽管所有研究都指出了众所周知的障碍。本文回顾了这些干预措施和方法的证据基础。我们的结论是,有经验的专业人员有时间在家庭中与其建立支持性、非评判性的关系,长期工作,与社区和其他服务机构建立联系,可以促进有效的参与。虽然这些结论是从旨在减少儿童虐待的更广泛研究中得出的,但我们强调了与有遭受重大伤害风险的儿童的家庭进行婴儿猝死预防工作的相关教训。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验