• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阻断后眼内压的实时动态变化:两种白内障超声乳化系统的比较。

Real-time dynamic changes in intraocular pressure after occlusion break: comparing 2 phacoemulsification systems.

机构信息

From the Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Sep 1;47(9):1205-1209. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000666.

DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000666
PMID:33929803
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare real-time intraocular pressure (IOP) response to occlusion break event in 2 phacoemulsification systems.

SETTING

Iladevi Cataract and IOL Research Center, India.

DESIGN

Randomized, experimental study.

METHODS

Rabbits were randomized to:Group I (n = 10 eyes), Centurion Vision system with active fluidics, or, Group II (n = 10 eyes), Centurion with Active Sentry. Within each group, parameter set 1 (IOP 30 mm Hg, aspiration flow rate [AFR] 20 mL/min, and vacuum 600 mm Hg) and parameter set 2 (IOP 50 mm Hg, AFR 25 mL/min, and vacuum 600 mm Hg) were tested. Real-time rate of drop and rise of IOP after occlusion break event (mm Hg per second) and percentage reduction of IOP from maximum during nuclear fragment removal were compared.

RESULTS

10 rabbits (20 eyes) were included. Rate of drop of IOP after occlusion break was not significantly different between groups. Rate of rise of IOP was statistically significantly higher in Group II with both parameter sets (199.09 ± 69.28 vs 94.33 ± 45.66 in parameter set 1, P = .006; and 256 ± 45.05 vs 165.25 ± 51.80 in parameter set 2, P = .005), suggesting faster recovery to baseline IOP after occlusion break. The mean percentage reduction of IOP from maximum was significantly higher in Group I (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Rise of IOP to baseline after occlusion break event was faster and mean percentage reduction of IOP from maximum during nuclear fragment removal was lower when using the Centurion Vision system with the Active Sentry upgrade compared with the traditional handpiece. The ability to sense IOP at the level of the handpiece with the Active Sentry upgrade allows faster mitigation of surge response.

摘要

目的

比较两种超声乳化仪系统中断流后实时眼压(IOP)的反应。

设置

印度 Iladevi 白内障和人工晶状体研究中心。

设计

随机、实验研究。

方法

将兔子随机分为两组:I 组(n = 10 只眼),Centurion Vision 系统,带主动流控,或 II 组(n = 10 只眼),Centurion 带主动监测仪。在每组内,测试参数设置 1(IOP 30mmHg,抽吸流速[AFR]20mL/min,真空 600mmHg)和参数设置 2(IOP 50mmHg,AFR 25mL/min,真空 600mmHg)。比较断流后实时 IOP 下降和上升率(每秒眼压下降或上升mmHg),以及从核碎片移除时最大IOP 降低的百分比。

结果

共纳入 10 只兔子(20 只眼)。两组间断流后 IOP 下降率无显著差异。两组参数设置下,IOP 上升率均显著更高(参数设置 1 时,II 组为 199.09 ± 69.28 vs 94.33 ± 45.66,P =.006;参数设置 2 时,256 ± 45.05 vs 165.25 ± 51.80,P =.005),提示断流后更快恢复到基础 IOP。从最大IOP 降低的平均百分比在 I 组显著更高(P =.003)。

结论

与传统手柄相比,使用带有主动监测仪升级的 Centurion Vision 系统,断流后 IOP 上升到基础水平更快,从核碎片移除时最大IOP 降低的平均百分比更低。带有主动监测仪升级的手柄可感知IOP 的能力允许更快地缓解压力反应。

相似文献

1
Real-time dynamic changes in intraocular pressure after occlusion break: comparing 2 phacoemulsification systems.阻断后眼内压的实时动态变化:两种白内障超声乳化系统的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Sep 1;47(9):1205-1209. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000666.
2
Experimental study comparing 2 different phacoemulsification systems with intraocular pressure control during steady-state flow and occlusion break surge events.比较两种不同的超声乳化系统在恒流和阻断涌流事件期间眼压控制的实验研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Sep 1;49(9):976-981. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001242.
3
Intraoperative Performance and Early Postoperative Outcomes Following Phacoemulsification With Three Fluidic Systems: A Randomized Trial.三种流体系统行超声乳化白内障吸除术后的术中表现和早期术后结果:一项随机试验。
J Refract Surg. 2024 May;40(5):e304-e312. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240314-02. Epub 2024 May 1.
4
Does low infusion pressure microincision cataract surgery (LIPMICS) reduce frequency of post-occlusion breaks?低灌注压微切口白内障手术(LIPMICS)是否降低了术后阻塞破裂的频率?
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr-Jun;66(2):135-139. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2022.27.
5
OUR EXPERIENCE WITH ACTIVE SENTRY AND CENTURION OZIL HANDPIECES.我们使用主动哨兵和欧智乐(Centurion) Ozil 手柄的经验。
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2021 Winter;77(1):18-21. doi: 10.31348/2021/1.
6
Effect of a new phacoemulsification and aspiration handpiece on anterior chamber stability.新型超声乳化手柄对前房稳定性的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Jan 1;49(1):91-96. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001071.
7
Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems.比较超声乳化系统的离解响应和真空上升时间。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul 30;14:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-96.
8
Experimental study of occlusion break surge volume in 3 different phacoemulsification systems.三种不同超声乳化系统中的断流期超声乳化液体积的实验研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Nov 1;47(11):1466-1472. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000651.
9
Phacoemulsifier occlusion break surge volume reduction.超声乳化仪堵塞断流冲击容积减少术。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Dec;44(12):1491-1496. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.032.
10
Comparison of two phacoemulsification system handpieces: prospective randomized comparative study.两种超声乳化仪手柄的比较:前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Mar 1;48(3):328-333. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000769.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of perfusion pressure sensors on posterior capsule elevation in the porcine eye model with eyelid speculums.灌注压力传感器对使用眼睑撑开器的猪眼模型中后囊膜抬高的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21908. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08134-8.
2
Comparison of Intraoperative Parameters between Two Handpieces in One-Handed Phacoemulsification with Active Fluidics.在使用主动流体技术的单手超声乳化术中两种手持器械的术中参数比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;14(19):2141. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192141.
3
Safety and prognosis of phacoemulsification using active sentry and active fluidics with different IOP settings - a randomized, controlled study.
不同眼压设定下使用主动哨兵和主动射流的超声乳化安全性和预后 - 一项随机对照研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 16;24(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03626-z.
4
Comment on: Experimental study comparing 2 different phacoemulsification systems with intraocular pressure control during steady-state flow and occlusion break surge events.关于以下内容的评论:比较两种不同超声乳化系统在稳态血流和阻塞解除激增事件期间眼压控制情况的实验研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Mar 1;50(3):312. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001391.
5
Effect and Safety of Pressure Sensor-equipped Handpiece in Phacoemulsification System.配备压力传感器的超声乳化手术系统手柄的效果及安全性
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;37(5):387-394. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2022.0157. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
6
Application of the Active-Fluidics System in Phacoemulsification: A Review.主动流体系统在白内障超声乳化术中的应用:综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 12;12(2):611. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020611.