Larson E, Oram L F, Hedrick E
Nutting Chair in Clinical Nursing, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):676-84. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00003.
An interest in using nosocomial infection rates as an outcome measure to reflect quality of care in hospitals prompted us to consider factors in addition to quality that influence these rates. Approximately one third of nosocomial infections are potentially preventable, and changes in this "preventable" stratum of infections should reflect variations in quality. However, it will be necessary to identify those potentially preventable infections by calculating rates which are adjusted for intrinsic patient risk. Five other factors necessary for nosocomial infection rates to be a valid and reliable indicator of quality include identification of critical indicators (e.g., types of infection) and sampling schemes that most accurately reflect variations in quality; adoption of standardized, objective definitions of site-specific nosocomial infections; adoption of universal denominators across institutions; development of a monitoring system to assess compliance with surveillance and reporting procedures; and the adoption of more standardized training for infection control practitioners.
将医院感染率作为反映医院护理护理护理质量的一项结果指标的兴趣促使我们去考虑除质量之外影响这些感染率的因素。大约三分之一的医院感染是有可能预防的,而这一“可预防”感染层面的变化应能反映质量的差异。然而,有必要通过计算针对患者内在风险进行调整的感染率来识别那些有可能预防的感染。医院感染率要成为质量的有效且可靠指标还需要其他五个因素,包括识别关键指标(如感染类型)以及能最准确反映质量差异的抽样方案;采用针对特定部位医院感染的标准化、客观定义;各机构采用统一的分母;建立一个监测系统以评估对监测和报告程序的遵守情况;以及为感染控制从业人员提供更标准化的培训。