• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准血液实验室值作为临床支持工具,以区分 SARS-CoV-2 阳性和阴性患者。

Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients.

机构信息

Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Emergency Department, Klinik Donaustadt, 122 Langobardenstrasse, 1210, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 30;11(1):9365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88844-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-88844-x
PMID:33931692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8087776/
Abstract

Standard blood laboratory parameters may have diagnostic potential, if polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) tests are not available on time. We evaluated standard blood laboratory parameters of 655 COVID-19 patients suspected to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, who underwent PCR testing in one of five hospitals in Vienna, Austria. We compared laboratory parameters, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between positive and negative PCR-tested patients and evaluated the ability of those parameters to distinguish between groups. Of the 590 patients (20-100 years, 276 females and 314 males), 208 were PCR-positive. Positive compared to negative PCR-tested patients had significantly lower levels of leukocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocytes, and thrombocytes; while significantly higher levels were detected with erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, C-reactive-protein, ferritin, activated-partial-thromboplastin-time, alanine-aminotransferase, aspartate-aminotransferase, lipase, creatine-kinase, and lactate-dehydrogenase. From all blood parameters, eosinophils, ferritin, leukocytes, and erythrocytes showed the highest ability to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative patients (area-under-curve, AUC: 72.3-79.4%). The AUC of our model was 0.915 (95% confidence intervals, 0.876-0.955). Leukopenia, eosinopenia, elevated erythrocytes, and hemoglobin were among the strongest markers regarding accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and post-test probabilities. Our findings suggest that especially leukopenia, eosinopenia, and elevated hemoglobin are helpful to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative tested patients.

摘要

标准的血液实验室参数可能具有诊断潜力,如果聚合酶链反应(PCR)测试不能及时进行。我们评估了奥地利维也纳的五家医院中接受 PCR 检测的 655 名疑似感染 SARS-CoV-2 的 COVID-19 患者的标准血液实验室参数。我们比较了 PCR 检测阳性和阴性患者的实验室参数、临床特征和结局,并评估了这些参数区分两组的能力。在 590 名患者(20-100 岁,276 名女性和 314 名男性)中,208 名患者的 PCR 检测呈阳性。与 PCR 检测阴性的患者相比,PCR 检测阳性的患者白细胞、中性粒细胞、嗜碱性粒细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、单核细胞和血小板计数显著降低;而红细胞、血红蛋白、血细胞比容、C 反应蛋白、铁蛋白、活化部分凝血活酶时间、丙氨酸氨基转移酶、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶、脂肪酶、肌酸激酶和乳酸脱氢酶水平显著升高。在所有血液参数中,嗜酸性粒细胞、铁蛋白、白细胞和红细胞对区分 COVID-19 阳性和阴性患者的能力最强(曲线下面积,AUC:72.3-79.4%)。我们模型的 AUC 为 0.915(95%置信区间,0.876-0.955)。白细胞减少症、嗜酸性粒细胞减少症、红细胞和血红蛋白升高是准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值、阳性和阴性似然比以及后验概率方面最强的标志物之一。我们的研究结果表明,特别是白细胞减少症、嗜酸性粒细胞减少症和血红蛋白升高有助于区分 COVID-19 检测阳性和阴性的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9c/8087776/75854300e692/41598_2021_88844_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9c/8087776/75854300e692/41598_2021_88844_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e9c/8087776/75854300e692/41598_2021_88844_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Standard blood laboratory values as a clinical support tool to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients.标准血液实验室值作为临床支持工具,以区分 SARS-CoV-2 阳性和阴性患者。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 30;11(1):9365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88844-x.
2
Relationship between leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet counts, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and polymerase chain reaction positivity.白细胞、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、血小板计数与中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和聚合酶链反应阳性之间的关系。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Apr;93:107390. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107390. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
3
Routine blood tests as a potential diagnostic tool for COVID-19.常规血液检查可作为 COVID-19 的潜在诊断工具。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1095-1099. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0398.
4
Eosinopenia <100/μL as a marker of active COVID-19: An observational prospective study.嗜酸性粒细胞计数 <100/μL 作为 COVID-19 活动期的标志物:一项观察性前瞻性研究。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2021 Feb;54(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.12.005. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
5
Factors Associated with a Positive Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Testing in Suspected Cases Presenting with Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Medical Center.与疑似肺炎患者 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性相关的因素:单中心回顾性队列研究。
Respiration. 2020;99(9):739-747. doi: 10.1159/000508398. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
6
Specificity and positive predictive value of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing in a low-prevalence setting.低流行地区 SARS-CoV-2 核酸扩增检测的特异性和阳性预测值。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):469.e9-469.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
7
Evaluation of Routine Blood Tests for Diagnosis of Suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019.用于诊断疑似2019冠状病毒病的常规血液检查评估
Clin Lab. 2020 Sep 1;66(9). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.200522.
8
Laboratory predictors of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the area of Valcamonica, Italy.意大利瓦尔卡莫尼卡地区预测 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)死亡的实验室指标。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1100-1105. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0459.
9
The Association of Age, Sex, and RT-PCR Results with the Lymphocyte and Neutrophil Counts in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Cross-sectional Analysis of 1450 Iranian Patients with COVID-19.年龄、性别和 RT-PCR 结果与 SARS-CoV-2 感染中的淋巴细胞和中性粒细胞计数的关系:对 1450 例伊朗 COVID-19 患者的横断面分析。
Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Apr 17;20(2):129-139.
10
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Tool to Rule Out COVID-19 Among Adults in the Emergency Department Using Routine Blood Tests: A Large, Multicenter, Real-World Study.利用常规血液检测排除急诊科成人COVID-19的机器学习工具的开发与外部验证:一项大型、多中心、真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e24048. doi: 10.2196/24048.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of LEF1-AS1 with cardiovascular and neurological complications of COVID-19.LEF1-AS1与新型冠状病毒肺炎心血管及神经并发症的关联
J Mol Cell Cardiol Plus. 2024 Dec 22;11:100280. doi: 10.1016/j.jmccpl.2024.100280. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Clinical Hematochemical Parameters in Differential Diagnosis between Pediatric SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Virus Infection: An Automated Machine Learning Approach.儿童新型冠状病毒肺炎与流感病毒感染鉴别诊断中的临床血液生化参数:一种自动化机器学习方法
Children (Basel). 2023 Apr 22;10(5):761. doi: 10.3390/children10050761.
3
Cardiovascular and Renal Comorbidities Included into Neural Networks Predict the Outcome in COVID-19 Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit: Three-Center, Cross-Validation, Age- and Sex-Matched Study.

本文引用的文献

1
First results of a national external quality assessment scheme for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences.国家 SARS-CoV-2 基因组序列检测外部质量评估计划的初步结果。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104537. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104537. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
2
Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study.利用机器学习从常规血液检查中检测 COVID-19 感染:一项可行性研究。
J Med Syst. 2020 Jul 1;44(8):135. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01597-4.
3
Laboratory Tests and Outcome for Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
纳入神经网络的心血管和肾脏合并症可预测入住重症监护病房的COVID-19患者的预后:三中心、交叉验证、年龄和性别匹配研究
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Jan 23;10(2):39. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10020039.
4
A Hybrid Feature Selection Approach to Screen a Novel Set of Blood Biomarkers for Early COVID-19 Mortality Prediction.一种用于筛选新型血液生物标志物集以预测COVID-19早期死亡率的混合特征选择方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;12(7):1604. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071604.
5
Insights Into the Changing Landscape of Coronavirus Disease 2019.对 2019 年冠状病毒病变化格局的洞察。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Jan 10;11:761521. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.761521. eCollection 2021.
6
COVID-19 diagnosis from routine blood tests using artificial intelligence techniques.使用人工智能技术通过常规血液检测诊断新冠病毒肺炎
Biomed Signal Process Control. 2022 Feb;72:103263. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103263. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
7
Ruling Out Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Patients with Pneumonia: The Role of Blood Cell Count and Lung Ultrasound.排除肺炎患者的新型冠状病毒肺炎:血细胞计数和肺部超声的作用
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 6;10(16):3481. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163481.
2019年冠状病毒病患者的实验室检查与预后:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Sep 1;5(5):1038-1049. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa098.
4
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Outcomes in Louisiana COVID-19 Patients.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与路易斯安那州 COVID-19 患者结局的关系。
Shock. 2020 Nov;54(5):652-658. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001585.
5
Biomarkers associated with COVID-19 disease progression.与 COVID-19 疾病进展相关的生物标志物。
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020 Sep;57(6):389-399. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2020.1770685. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
6
Swabs Collected by Patients or Health Care Workers for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.患者或医护人员采集的用于新型冠状病毒检测的拭子。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 30;383(5):494-496. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2016321. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
7
Eosinopenia and elevated C-reactive protein facilitate triage of COVID-19 patients in fever clinic: A retrospective case-control study.嗜酸性粒细胞减少和C反应蛋白升高有助于发热门诊对COVID-19患者进行分诊:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 May 3;23:100375. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100375. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Mild or Moderate Covid-19.轻度或中度新冠病毒感染
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 29;383(18):1757-1766. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2009249. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
9
Routine blood tests as a potential diagnostic tool for COVID-19.常规血液检查可作为 COVID-19 的潜在诊断工具。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1095-1099. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0398.
10
Hematologic, biochemical and immune biomarker abnormalities associated with severe illness and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis.与 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)严重疾病和死亡相关的血液学、生物化学和免疫生物标志物异常:荟萃分析。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1021-1028. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0369.