• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于诊断疑似2019冠状病毒病的常规血液检查评估

Evaluation of Routine Blood Tests for Diagnosis of Suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019.

作者信息

Santotoribio Jose D, Nuñez-Jurado David, Lepe-Balsalobre Esperanza

出版信息

Clin Lab. 2020 Sep 1;66(9). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.200522.

DOI:10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.200522
PMID:32902237
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, it is not universally available and may have limitations in response times. The aim was to evaluate the routine blood tests for diagnosis of COVID-19, determining the diagnostic accuracy of blood biomarkers to differentiate between patients with and without COVID-19.

METHODS

Clinical charts, nursing records, laboratory findings, and chest x-rays from adult patients with clinical suspicion of COVID-19 (fever, cough and/or dyspnea) at hospital admission were reviewed. Patients were classified into two groups according to RT-PCR COVID-19: positive (COVID-19) or negative (NON-COVID-19). Diagnostic accuracy was determined by analyzing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and the cutoff value. In order to reduce the number of false positives, the cutoff value with a specificity of 80% was considered.

RESULTS

Two hundred three patients (101 females, 102 males) with ages between 18 and 96 years (mean = 61.3) were studied. Ninety-four were COVID-19 and 109 were NON-COVID-19. Plasma ferritin level was the most accurate biomarker (AUC = 0.847 and 0.804 in women and men, respectively). The following diagnostic criteria for suspected COVID-19 were established with biomarker cutoff values to differentiate between COVID-19 and NON-COVID-19 patients: lymphocytes ≤ 1.0 x 109/L; eosinophils ≤ 0.02 x 109/L; ferritin > 125% of upper reference limit (URL); LDH > 125% of URL; hsCRP > 80 mg/L; and D-dimer > 1.2 mg/L. Sensitivity was 66%, 64% 62%, 46%, 43%, and 33% for ferritin, eosinophils, LDH, hsCRP, lymphocytes, and D-dimer, respectively. Of those determined to be COVID-19 patients, 91% met one or more of the diagnostic criteria with these blood biomarkers, and of the NON-COVID-19 patients, 47% did not met any diagnostic criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood counts of lymphocytes and eosinophils, and plasma levels of D-dimer, LDH, hsCRP, and ferritin can be used to differentiate patients with and without COVID-19 and as a tool for diagnosis of suspected COVID-19 in adult patients at hospital admission.

摘要

背景

实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测(RT-PCR)是诊断2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的金标准;然而,它并非普遍可用,且在响应时间上可能存在局限性。目的是评估用于诊断COVID-19的常规血液检查,确定血液生物标志物区分COVID-19患者和非COVID-19患者的诊断准确性。

方法

回顾了成年患者入院时临床怀疑为COVID-19(发热、咳嗽和/或呼吸困难)的临床病历、护理记录、实验室检查结果和胸部X光片。根据RT-PCR检测结果将患者分为两组:阳性(COVID-19)或阴性(非COVID-19)。通过分析受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、计算ROC曲线下面积(AUC)和临界值来确定诊断准确性。为了减少假阳性数量,考虑特异性为80%的临界值。

结果

研究了203例年龄在18至96岁之间(平均 = 61.3岁)的患者(101例女性,102例男性)。94例为COVID-19患者,109例为非COVID-19患者。血浆铁蛋白水平是最准确的生物标志物(女性和男性的AUC分别为0.847和0.804)。建立了以下用于疑似COVID-19的诊断标准,采用生物标志物临界值来区分COVID-19患者和非COVID-19患者:淋巴细胞≤1.0×10⁹/L;嗜酸性粒细胞≤0.02×10⁹/L;铁蛋白>参考上限(URL)的125%;乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)>URL的125%;超敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)>80mg/L;D-二聚体>1.2mg/L。铁蛋白、嗜酸性粒细胞、LDH、hsCRP、淋巴细胞和D-二聚体的敏感性分别为66%、64%、62%、46%、43%和33%。在被确定为COVID-19的患者中,91%符合这些血液生物标志物中的一项或多项诊断标准,而在非COVID-19患者中,47%不符合任何诊断标准。

结论

淋巴细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞计数以及D-二聚体、LDH、hsCRP和铁蛋白的血浆水平可用于区分COVID-19患者和非COVID-19患者,并作为入院成年患者疑似COVID-19诊断的工具。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Routine Blood Tests for Diagnosis of Suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019.用于诊断疑似2019冠状病毒病的常规血液检查评估
Clin Lab. 2020 Sep 1;66(9). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.200522.
2
Rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients at the emergency department using routine testing.在急诊科使用常规检测快速识别 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 29;58(9):1587-1593. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0593. Print 2020 Aug 27.
3
IL-6-based mortality risk model for hospitalized patients with COVID-19.基于 IL-6 的 COVID-19 住院患者死亡风险模型。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Oct;146(4):799-807.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
A new parameter in COVID-19 pandemic: initial lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/Lymphocyte ratio for diagnosis and mortality.COVID-19 大流行中的一个新参数:初始乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)/淋巴细胞比值用于诊断和死亡率预测。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Nov;13(11):1664-1670. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
5
Laboratory predictors of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the area of Valcamonica, Italy.意大利瓦尔卡莫尼卡地区预测 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)死亡的实验室指标。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1100-1105. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0459.
6
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎的胸部影像学检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub2.
7
Baseline chest X-ray in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) patients: association with clinical and laboratory data.新冠肺炎(COVID-19)患者的基线胸部 X 光片:与临床和实验室数据的关联。
Radiol Med. 2020 Dec;125(12):1271-1279. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01272-1. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
8
The clinical implication of dynamic neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and D-dimer in COVID-19: A retrospective study in Suzhou China.新冠肺炎患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和 D-二聚体的临床意义:中国苏州的一项回顾性研究。
Thromb Res. 2020 Aug;192:3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 6.
9
Diagnostic utility of clinical laboratory data determinations for patients with the severe COVID-19.严重 COVID-19 患者临床实验室数据测定的诊断效用。
J Med Virol. 2020 Jul;92(7):791-796. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25770. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
10
Routine blood tests as a potential diagnostic tool for COVID-19.常规血液检查可作为 COVID-19 的潜在诊断工具。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1095-1099. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0398.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a host-signature-based machine learning model to diagnose bacterial and viral infections in febrile children.基于宿主特征的机器学习模型用于诊断发热儿童细菌和病毒感染的开发。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Aug 6;13:1608812. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1608812. eCollection 2025.
2
Predicting Survival Status in COVID-19 Patients: Machine Learning Models Development with Ventilator-Related and Biochemical Parameters from Early Stages: A Pilot Study.预测COVID-19患者的生存状态:基于早期阶段呼吸机相关参数和生化参数的机器学习模型开发:一项试点研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 17;13(20):6190. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206190.
3
The Fluctuation Trend of Serum Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG Antibodies Seroprevalence in the Non-COVID-19 Infected Population and Correlation with Peripheral Blood Leukocyte Parameters in Beijing, China, 2021: A Real-World Study.
2021年中国北京非新冠病毒感染人群血清抗SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG抗体血清流行率的波动趋势及其与外周血白细胞参数的相关性:一项真实世界研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Apr 7;10(4):571. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040571.
4
Definition of the Immune Parameters Related to COVID-19 Severity.与 COVID-19 严重程度相关的免疫参数的定义。
Front Immunol. 2022 Mar 18;13:850846. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.850846. eCollection 2022.
5
An integrated framework for identifying clinical-laboratory indicators for novel pandemics: COVID-19 and MIS-C.用于识别新型大流行疾病(如新冠病毒病和儿童多系统炎症综合征)临床实验室指标的综合框架
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jan 20;5(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00547-9.
6
The evolving direct and indirect platforms for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.不断发展的 SARS-CoV-2 直接和间接检测平台。
J Virol Methods. 2022 Feb;300:114381. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114381. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
7
Diagnostic value of white blood cell parameters for COVID-19: Is there a role for HFLC and IG?白细胞参数对 COVID-19 的诊断价值:HFLC 和 IG 是否有作用?
Int J Lab Hematol. 2022 Feb;44(1):104-111. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13728. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
8
The Impact of Peripheral Eosinophil Counts and Eosinophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (ELR) in the Clinical Course of COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study.外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数和嗜酸性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(ELR)对 COVID-19 患者临床病程的影响:一项回顾性研究。
In Vivo. 2021 Jan-Feb;35(1):641-648. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12303.