Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital Vital Brazil, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.
Toxicon. 2021 Jul 30;198:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.04.021. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
Despite the biological relevance and abundance of non-front-fanged colubroid snakes, little is known about their medical significance. Here, we describe the clinical, epidemiological, and biological aspects of bites by two colubroid species. We retrospectively analyzed cases of Xenodon merremii and Xenodon neuwiedii bites in which the offending snake was clearly identified. Analyses included variables related to the snake and the patient, including demographic data, clinical findings, and treatments. Of the 163 cases, 123 were bites by X. merremii and 40 by X. neuwiedii. Most bites occurred in spring and summer, predominantly during the daytime. Most offending snakes were female. Bites by X. merremii juveniles were more frequent in autumn than in other seasons, whereas those by X. neuwiedii adults were in the summer. Hands and feet were the most frequently affected regions, with no significant difference between upper and lower limbs bitten by either X. merremii or X. neuwiedii. The main clinical findings were pain, transitory bleeding, erythema, and local edema. Local edema was proportionally more frequent with X. neuwiedii bites than with X. merremii bites. No patient had extensive edema or systemic envenomation. A significant association between the snout-vent-length and transitory bleeding in bites by X. merremii, but not in those by X. neuwiedii, was identified. Whole blood clotting tests were normal in all tested patients (62 cases). Sixteen patients were incorrectly treated with anti-Bothrops antivenom. In conclusion, most accidents caused by X. merremii and X. neuwiedii present mild local symptomatology. These snakes can be mistaken for lance-headed vipers, and some bites present symptoms that resemble mild bites by Bothrops sp. Physicians should be aware of X. merremii and X. neuwiedii bites to avoid unnecessary patient distress and overprescription of antivenom.
尽管非前齿类游蛇在生物学上具有相关性且数量丰富,但对其医学意义知之甚少。在这里,我们描述了两种游蛇物种咬伤的临床、流行病学和生物学方面。我们回顾性分析了明确识别出肇事蛇的 Xenodon merremii 和 Xenodon neuwiedii 咬伤病例。分析包括与蛇和患者相关的变量,包括人口统计学数据、临床发现和治疗。在 163 例病例中,123 例为 Xenodon merremii 咬伤,40 例为 Xenodon neuwiedii 咬伤。大多数咬伤发生在春季和夏季,主要在白天。大多数肇事蛇为雌性。Xenodon merremii 幼体咬伤在秋季比其他季节更常见,而 Xenodon neuwiedii 成体咬伤在夏季。手和脚是最常受影响的部位,Xenodon merremii 和 Xenodon neuwiedii 咬伤的上肢和下肢之间无明显差异。主要的临床发现是疼痛、短暂性出血、红斑和局部水肿。Xenodon neuwiedii 咬伤比 Xenodon merremii 咬伤更容易出现局部水肿。没有患者出现广泛水肿或全身性中毒。Xenodon merremii 咬伤的患者中,吻肛长与短暂性出血之间存在显著相关性,但 Xenodon neuwiedii 咬伤的患者中则没有。所有接受检测的患者(62 例)的全血凝血试验均正常。16 例患者错误地接受了抗矛头蝮蛇毒血清治疗。总之,Xenodon merremii 和 Xenodon neuwiedii 引起的大多数事故都表现出轻度的局部症状。这些蛇可能被误认为矛头蝮蛇,有些咬伤的症状类似于轻微的 Bothrops sp. 咬伤。医生应该了解 Xenodon merremii 和 Xenodon neuwiedii 咬伤,以避免不必要的患者痛苦和抗蛇毒血清的过度使用。