Suppr超能文献

跨专业质量圈-减药模块(QC-DeMo)对瑞士养老院的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of an interprofessional Quality Circle-Deprescribing Module (QC-DeMo) in Swiss nursing homes: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Community Pharmacy, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 44, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 1;21(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02220-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are common among nursing homes (NH) residents, as is polypharmacy. Deprescribing has emerged in the past decade as a safe and effective way to reduce the use of PIMs and improve patient outcomes. However, effective deprescribing interventions are expensive, as they require specialised staff and a great amount of time for each resident. The Quality Circle Deprescribing Module (QC-DeMo) intervention was designed to be less resource-intensive than medication reviews, the current deprescribing gold standard. It consists of a QC session in which physicians, nurses, and pharmacists define a local deprescribing consensus for specific PIMs classes, which is then implemented in the NH. The intervention was trialled in a RCT, with the NH as unit of analysis.

METHODS

After randomisation, intervention NHs enacted the QC-DeMo at the start of the follow-up year. The primary outcomes were the proportion of PIM galenic units and number of PIM defined daily dose per average resident and per day (DDD/res). PIM status was assessed by a combination of the 2015 Beers list and the Norwegian General Practice-Nursing Home criteria. Secondary outcomes were the number of DDD/res to avoid and to reevaluate; safety outcomes were mortality, hospitalisations, falls, and use of physical restraints. Outcomes were evaluated at follow-up using linear regression models, adjusting for the outcome baseline values.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight NHs took part in the trial; no individual residents were recruited. The intervention did not reduce the primary outcomes, but a strong trend towards reduction was seen for the number of PIM DDD/res, which accounts for the doses used. PIM DDD/res to reevaluate were significantly reduced, mostly through a reduction in the use of proton-pump inhibitors. Falls and use of physical restraints were not affected, but a statistical interaction between the mission of the NH (geriatric unit or specialised dementia unit) and the intervention group was seen for mortality and hospitalisations.

CONCLUSIONS

The QC-DeMo intervention can reduce the use of some PIM classes, and could usefully complement other deprescribing interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03688542 ), registered on 26.09.2018, retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

养老院(NH)居民中普遍存在潜在不适当药物(PIM)和多种药物治疗。 过去十年中,逐渐出现了一种安全有效的方法来减少 PIM 的使用并改善患者的治疗结果,即撤药。 然而,有效的撤药干预措施成本很高,因为它们需要专门的人员和大量时间来为每位居民进行干预。 质量圈撤药模块(QC-DeMo)干预措施的设计目的是比目前的撤药金标准药物审查更节省资源。 它包括一个 QC 会议,在会议上,医生、护士和药剂师为特定的 PIM 类别定义了一个当地的撤药共识,然后在 NH 中实施。 该干预措施已在 RCT 中进行了试验,以 NH 为分析单位。

方法

随机分组后,干预 NH 在随访年开始时实施 QC-DeMo。 主要结局是 PIM 剂型单位的比例和 PIM 定义的每日剂量(DDD/res)的数量,按平均居民和每天(DDD/res)计算。 PIM 状态通过 2015 年 Beers 清单和挪威全科医生-疗养院标准的组合进行评估。次要结局是避免和重新评估的 DDD/res 的数量;安全性结局是死亡率、住院、跌倒和使用身体约束。使用线性回归模型在随访时评估结局,调整结局的基线值。

结果

58 家 NH 参与了试验;没有招募单个居民。 干预措施并没有降低主要结局,但 PIM DDD/res 的数量呈现出明显的下降趋势,这与所使用的剂量有关。 重新评估的 PIM DDD/res 显著减少,主要是通过减少质子泵抑制剂的使用。 跌倒和使用身体约束没有受到影响,但 NH 的使命(老年病房或专门的痴呆病房)和干预组之间存在统计学上的相互作用,对死亡率和住院率有影响。

结论

QC-DeMo 干预措施可以减少一些 PIM 类别的使用,并可作为其他撤药干预措施的有益补充。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03688542),2018 年 9 月 26 日注册,回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c86f/8088558/4b1353d99040/12877_2021_2220_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验