The University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Department of Surgery, Chapel Hill, NC.
The University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Surgery. 2021 Oct;170(4):1039-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.050. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
While ostomies for diverticulitis are often intended to be temporary, ostomy reversal rates can be as low as 46%. There are few comprehensive studies evaluating the effects of socioeconomic status as a disparity in ostomy reversal. We hypothesized that among the elderly Medicare population undergoing partial colectomy for diverticulitis, lower socioeconomic status would be associated with reduced reversal rates.
Retrospective cohort study using a 20% representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries >65 years old with diverticulitis who received ostomies between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017. We evaluated the effect of neighborhood socioeconomic status, measured by the Social Deprivation Index, on ostomy reversal within 1 year. Secondary outcomes were complications and mortality.
Of 10,572 patients, ostomy reversals ranged from 21.2% (low socioeconomic status) to 29.8% (highest socioeconomic status), with a shorter time to reversal among higher socioeconomic status groups. Patients with low socioeconomic status were less likely to have their ostomies reversed, compared with the highest socioeconomic status group (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.93) and were more likely to die (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.33). When stratified by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, non-Hispanic White patients at every socioeconomic status had a higher reversal rate than non-Hispanic Black patients (White patients 32.0%-24.8% vs Black patients 19.6%-14.7%). Socioeconomic status appeared to have a higher relative impact among non-Hispanic Black patients.
Among Medicare diverticulitis patients, ostomy reversal rates are low. Patients with lower socioeconomic status are less likely to undergo stoma reversal and are more likely to die; Black patients are least likely to have an ostomy reversal.
虽然憩室炎的造口术通常是临时性的,但造口还纳率可能低至 46%。很少有全面的研究评估社会经济地位作为造口还纳差异的影响。我们假设,在接受憩室炎部分结肠切除术的老年医疗保险人群中,较低的社会经济地位与降低的还纳率相关。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了医疗保险受益人中 20%的代表性样本,年龄在 65 岁以上,患有憩室炎并在 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间接受造口术。我们评估了社会剥夺指数衡量的邻里社会经济地位对 1 年内造口还纳的影响。次要结果是并发症和死亡率。
在 10572 名患者中,造口还纳率从低社会经济地位组的 21.2%(低社会经济地位)到高社会经济地位组的 29.8%(高社会经济地位),高社会经济地位组的还纳时间更短。与最高社会经济地位组相比,低社会经济地位组的患者更不可能进行造口还纳(风险比 0.83,95%置信区间 0.74-0.93),并且更有可能死亡(风险比 1.21,95%置信区间 1.10-1.33)。按种族/族裔和社会经济地位分层时,每一个社会经济地位的非西班牙裔白人患者的还纳率都高于非西班牙裔黑人患者(白人患者为 32.0%-24.8%,黑人患者为 19.6%-14.7%)。社会经济地位似乎对非西班牙裔黑人患者的影响更大。
在医疗保险憩室炎患者中,造口还纳率较低。社会经济地位较低的患者更不可能进行造口还纳,并且更有可能死亡;黑人患者最不可能进行造口还纳。