Suppr超能文献

基于传统步态模型中关节角度来估计肌肉-肌腱长度时,一致的工作流程的重要性。

The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model.

机构信息

Centre for Sport Science and University Sports, Department of Biomechanics, Kinesiology and Computer Science in Sport, Neuromechanics Research Group, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Center for Gait and Motion Analysis, Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St Paul, MN, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2021 Jul;88:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.04.039. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal models enable us to estimate muscle-tendon length, which has been shown to improve clinical decision-making and outcomes in children with cerebral palsy. Most clinical gait analysis services, however, do not include muscle-tendon length estimation in their clinical routine. This is due, in part, to a lack of knowledge and trust in the musculoskeletal models, and to the complexity involved in the workflow to obtain the muscle-tendon length.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can the joint angles obtained with the conventional gait model (CGM) be used to generate accurate muscle-tendon length estimates?

METHODS

Three-dimensional motion capture data of 15 children with cerebral palsy and 15 typically developing children were retrospectively analyzed and used to estimate muscle-tendon length with the following four modelling frameworks: (1) 2392-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including scaling, inverse kinematics and muscle analysis; (2) 2392-OSM-CGM-angle: generic 2392-OpenSim model driven with joint angles from the CGM; (3) modif-OSM-IK-angles: standard OpenSim workflow including inverse kinematics and a modified model with segment coordinate systems and joint degrees-of-freedom similar to the CGM; (4) modif-OSM-CGM-angles: modified model driven with joint angles from the CGM. Joint kinematics and muscle-tendon length were compared between the different modelling frameworks.

RESULTS

Large differences in hip joint kinematics were observed between the CGM and the 2392-OpenSim model. The modif-OSM showed similar kinematics as the CGM. Muscle-tendon length obtained with modif-OSM-IK-angles and modif-OSM-CGM-angles were similar, whereas large differences in some muscle-tendon length were observed between 2392-OSM-IK-angles and 2392-OSM-CGM-angles.

SIGNIFICANCE

The modif-OSM-CGM-angles framework enabled us to estimate muscle-tendon lengths without the need for scaling a musculoskeletal model and running inverse kinematics. Hence, muscle-tendon length estimates can be obtained simply, without the need for the complexity, knowledge and time required for musculoskeletal modeling and associated software. An instruction showing how the framework can be used in a clinical setting is provided on https://github.com/HansUniVie/MuscleLength.

摘要

背景

肌肉骨骼模型使我们能够估计肌肉肌腱长度,这已被证明可以改善脑瘫儿童的临床决策和结果。然而,大多数临床步态分析服务并未将肌肉肌腱长度估计纳入其临床常规。这部分是由于对肌肉骨骼模型缺乏了解和信任,以及获得肌肉肌腱长度的工作流程复杂所致。

研究问题

常规步态模型(CGM)获得的关节角度是否可用于生成准确的肌肉肌腱长度估计值?

方法

回顾性分析了 15 名脑瘫儿童和 15 名正常发育儿童的三维运动捕捉数据,并使用以下四个建模框架来估计肌肉肌腱长度:(1)2392-OSM-IK-angles:标准 OpenSim 工作流程,包括缩放、逆运动学和肌肉分析;(2)2392-OSM-CGM-angles:通用 2392-OpenSim 模型,由 CGM 的关节角度驱动;(3)modif-OSM-IK-angles:标准 OpenSim 工作流程,包括逆运动学和与 CGM 相似的模型,具有分段坐标系和关节自由度;(4)modif-OSM-CGM-angles:由 CGM 的关节角度驱动的修改模型。比较了不同建模框架之间的关节运动学和肌肉肌腱长度。

结果

CGM 和 2392-OpenSim 模型之间观察到髋关节运动学存在较大差异。modif-OSM 显示出与 CGM 相似的运动学。使用 modif-OSM-IK-angles 和 modif-OSM-CGM-angles 获得的肌肉肌腱长度相似,而 2392-OSM-IK-angles 和 2392-OSM-CGM-angles 之间的一些肌肉肌腱长度存在较大差异。

意义

modif-OSM-CGM-angles 框架使我们能够在无需缩放肌肉骨骼模型和运行逆运动学的情况下估计肌肉肌腱长度。因此,可以简单地获得肌肉肌腱长度估计值,而无需进行肌肉骨骼建模和相关软件所需的复杂性、知识和时间。在 https://github.com/HansUniVie/MuscleLength 上提供了一个说明如何在临床环境中使用该框架的说明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验