• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于域内任务自适应迁移学习的急性缺血性脑卒中发病时间推断

Intra-domain task-adaptive transfer learning to determine acute ischemic stroke onset time.

机构信息

Computational Diagnostics Lab, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.

Department of Radiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.

出版信息

Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2021 Jun;90:101926. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101926. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101926
PMID:33934065
Abstract

Treatment of acute ischemic strokes (AIS) is largely contingent upon the time since stroke onset (TSS). However, TSS may not be readily available in up to 25% of patients with unwitnessed AIS. Current clinical guidelines for patients with unknown TSS recommend the use of MRI to determine eligibility for thrombolysis, but radiology assessments have high inter-reader variability. In this work, we present deep learning models that leverage MRI diffusion series to classify TSS based on clinically validated thresholds. We propose an intra-domain task-adaptive transfer learning method, which involves training a model on an easier clinical task (stroke detection) and then refining the model with different binary thresholds of TSS. We apply this approach to both 2D and 3D CNN architectures with our top model achieving an ROC-AUC value of 0.74, with a sensitivity of 0.70 and a specificity of 0.81 for classifying TSS < 4.5 h. Our pretrained models achieve better classification metrics than the models trained from scratch, and these metrics exceed those of previously published models applied to our dataset. Furthermore, our pipeline accommodates a more inclusive patient cohort than previous work, as we did not exclude imaging studies based on clinical, demographic, or image processing criteria. When applied to this broad spectrum of patients, our deep learning model achieves an overall accuracy of 75.78% when classifying TSS < 4.5 h, carrying potential therapeutic implications for patients with unknown TSS.

摘要

急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)的治疗在很大程度上取决于发病时间(TSS)。然而,多达 25%的无目击者 AIS 患者可能无法获得 TSS。对于 TSS 未知的患者,当前的临床指南建议使用 MRI 来确定溶栓的资格,但影像学评估存在很大的读者间差异。在这项工作中,我们提出了利用 MRI 弥散系列基于临床验证的阈值来分类 TSS 的深度学习模型。我们提出了一种域内任务自适应迁移学习方法,该方法涉及在较简单的临床任务(中风检测)上训练模型,然后使用不同的 TSS 二进制阈值来细化模型。我们将这种方法应用于 2D 和 3D CNN 架构,我们的顶级模型在分类 TSS < 4.5 小时时的 ROC-AUC 值为 0.74,灵敏度为 0.70,特异性为 0.81。我们的预训练模型比从头开始训练的模型具有更好的分类指标,这些指标超过了应用于我们数据集的先前发表的模型的指标。此外,我们的流水线比以前的工作更能容纳更广泛的患者群体,因为我们没有根据临床、人口统计学或图像处理标准排除成像研究。当应用于这个广泛的患者群体时,我们的深度学习模型在分类 TSS < 4.5 小时时的总体准确率为 75.78%,这对 TSS 未知的患者具有潜在的治疗意义。

相似文献

1
Intra-domain task-adaptive transfer learning to determine acute ischemic stroke onset time.基于域内任务自适应迁移学习的急性缺血性脑卒中发病时间推断
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2021 Jun;90:101926. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101926. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Identifying acute ischemic stroke patients within the thrombolytic treatment window using deep learning.利用深度学习识别溶栓治疗时间窗内的急性缺血性脑卒中患者。
J Neuroimaging. 2022 Nov;32(6):1153-1160. doi: 10.1111/jon.13043. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
MRI radiomic features-based machine learning approach to classify ischemic stroke onset time.基于 MRI 放射组学特征的机器学习方法对缺血性脑卒中发病时间进行分类。
J Neurol. 2022 Jan;269(1):350-360. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10638-y. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
4
A Machine Learning Approach for Classifying Ischemic Stroke Onset Time From Imaging.一种基于机器学习的从影像中分类缺血性脑卒中发病时间的方法。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Jul;38(7):1666-1676. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2901445. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
5
An automatic machine learning approach for ischemic stroke onset time identification based on DWI and FLAIR imaging.一种基于 DWI 和 FLAIR 成像的缺血性脑卒中发病时间自动识别的机器学习方法。
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;31:102744. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102744. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
6
Multi-grained contrastive representation learning for label-efficient lesion segmentation and onset time classification of acute ischemic stroke.多粒度对比表示学习在急性缺血性脑卒中病灶分割和发病时间分类中的应用。
Med Image Anal. 2024 Oct;97:103250. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2024.103250. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
7
Classifying Acute Ischemic Stroke Onset Time using Deep Imaging Features.利用深度成像特征对急性缺血性中风发病时间进行分类
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:892-901. eCollection 2017.
8
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.
9
Automatic detection of acute ischemic stroke using non-contrast computed tomography and two-stage deep learning model.利用非对比 CT 与两阶段深度学习模型自动检测急性缺血性脑卒中。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Nov;196:105711. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105711. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
10
A Semi-Supervised Learning Framework to Leverage Proxy Information for Stroke MRI Analysis.一种利用代理信息进行中风 MRI 分析的半监督学习框架。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:2258-2261. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9631098.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated DWI-FLAIR mismatch assessment in stroke using DWI only.仅使用扩散加权成像(DWI)对卒中进行自动DWI-液体衰减反转恢复序列(FLAIR)不匹配评估。
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Aug 28:23969873251362712. doi: 10.1177/23969873251362712.
2
SDS-Net: A Synchronized Dual-Stage Network for Predicting Patients Within 4.5-h Thrombolytic Treatment Window Using MRI.SDS-Net:一种用于在4.5小时溶栓治疗窗口内使用MRI预测患者的同步双阶段网络。
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Jun;38(3):1681-1689. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01308-2. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Recanalization First-Pass Effect following Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.
深度学习在急性缺血性脑卒中患者机械取栓后再通首次通过效果预测中的应用。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug 9;45(8):1044-1052. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8272.
4
Ischemic stroke outcome prediction with diversity features from whole brain tissue using deep learning network.使用深度学习网络从全脑组织的多样性特征预测缺血性中风的结果。
Front Neurol. 2024 May 3;15:1394879. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1394879. eCollection 2024.
5
An Automatic DWI/FLAIR Mismatch Assessment of Stroke Patients.中风患者的自动扩散加权成像/液体衰减反转恢复序列不匹配评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 27;14(1):69. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010069.
6
The Value of Applying Machine Learning in Predicting the Time of Symptom Onset in Stroke Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.应用机器学习预测脑卒中患者症状发作时间的价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 12;25:e44895. doi: 10.2196/44895.
7
Artificial Intelligence for Automated DWI/FLAIR Mismatch Assessment on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Stroke: A Systematic Review.人工智能用于中风磁共振成像中自动扩散加权成像/液体衰减反转恢复序列不匹配评估:一项系统综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;13(12):2111. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122111.
8
Intracerebral hemorrhage CT scan image segmentation with HarDNet based transformer.基于 HarDNet 转换器的脑出血 CT 扫描图像分割。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 3;13(1):7208. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33775-y.
9
An Ensemble of Deep Learning Enabled Brain Stroke Classification Model in Magnetic Resonance Images.基于深度学习的磁共振影像脑卒中风型分类模型的研究
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Nov 18;2022:7815434. doi: 10.1155/2022/7815434. eCollection 2022.
10
Deep Learning in Ischemic Stroke Imaging Analysis: A Comprehensive Review.深度学习在缺血性脑卒中影像分析中的应用:全面综述。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Nov 14;2022:2456550. doi: 10.1155/2022/2456550. eCollection 2022.