• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Recanalization First-Pass Effect following Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.深度学习在急性缺血性脑卒中患者机械取栓后再通首次通过效果预测中的应用。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug 9;45(8):1044-1052. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8272.
2
Prediction of tissue and clinical thrombectomy outcome in acute ischaemic stroke using deep learning.利用深度学习预测急性缺血性卒中的组织和临床血栓切除术结果
Brain. 2025 Jan 18. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaf013.
3
Development and Validation of a Convolutional Neural Network Model to Predict a Pathologic Fracture in the Proximal Femur Using Abdomen and Pelvis CT Images of Patients With Advanced Cancer.利用晚期癌症患者腹部和骨盆 CT 图像建立卷积神经网络模型预测股骨近端病理性骨折的研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2247-2256. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002771. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术联合与不联合静脉溶栓治疗的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 24;4(4):CD015721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015721.pub2.
5
CT-Based Intrathrombus and Perithrombus Radiomics for Prediction of Prognosis after Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Retrospective Study across 2 Centers.基于CT的血栓内及血栓周围放射组学用于预测血管内血栓清除术后的预后:一项跨2个中心的回顾性研究
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Apr 2;46(4):681-688. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8522.
6
The influence of prestroke disability on outcome in patients with a low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score who underwent endovascular thrombectomy.卒中前残疾对接受血管内血栓切除术且阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期CT评分较低的患者预后的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2025 Feb 7;143(1):266-273. doi: 10.3171/2024.10.JNS24888. Print 2025 Jul 1.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Carotid Pseudo-Occlusion in the Setting of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.血管内血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性脑卒中时的颈动脉假性闭塞:一项比较系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 9;45(9):1241-1245. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8268.
9
HERMES-24 Score Derivation and Validation for Simple and Robust Outcome Prediction After Large Vessel Occlusion Treatment.HERMES-24 评分:用于预测大血管闭塞治疗后简单且稳健的结局。
Stroke. 2024 Aug;55(8):1982-1990. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.045871. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
10
Influence of Stroke-Onset Location on the Efficacy of Endovascular Thrombectomy: Comparison of Outcomes between In-Hospital versus Community-Onset Strokes.血管内血栓切除术疗效的影响:与院内发病和社区发病脑卒中的结局比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Oct 3;45(10):1482-1487. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8362.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of prognosis in acute ischemic stroke after mechanical thrombectomy based on multimodal MRI radiomics and deep learning.基于多模态MRI影像组学和深度学习预测机械取栓术后急性缺血性卒中的预后
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 30;16:1587347. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1587347. eCollection 2025.
2
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scoping Review.人工智能在急性缺血性卒中中的应用:一项范围综述
Neurointervention. 2024 Mar;20(1):4-14. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2025.00052. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3
Masked Image Modeling Meets Self-Distillation: A Transformer-Based Prostate Gland Segmentation Framework for Pathology Slides.掩码图像建模与自蒸馏相结合:一种用于病理切片的基于Transformer的前列腺分割框架
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 21;16(23):3897. doi: 10.3390/cancers16233897.

本文引用的文献

1
A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Acute Ischemic Stroke Thrombectomy Reperfusion using Discriminative MR Image Features.一种使用判别性磁共振图像特征预测急性缺血性脑卒中血栓切除术再灌注的机器学习方法。
IEEE EMBS Int Conf Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Jul;2021. doi: 10.1109/bhi50953.2021.9508597. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
2
Clinical outcomes of first-pass effect after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓后首次通过效果的临床转归:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;211:107030. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107030. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
3
Achieving More Rapid Door-to-Needle Times and Improved Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Nationwide Quality Improvement Intervention.在一项全国性质量改进干预措施中,实现急性缺血性卒中更快的门到针时间并改善治疗效果。
Stroke. 2022 Apr;53(4):1328-1338. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035853. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
4
First Pass Effect With Neurothrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Analysis of the Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Stroke Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke Registry.急性缺血性脑卒中神经血栓切除术的初次通过效应:急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗患者的系统评价分析登记研究。
Stroke. 2022 Feb;53(2):e30-e32. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035457. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
5
Clot imaging characteristics predict first pass effect of aspiration-first approach to thrombectomy.血栓成像特征可预测抽吸优先取栓方法的首次通过效果。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2022 Apr;28(2):152-159. doi: 10.1177/15910199211019174. Epub 2021 May 18.
6
Intra-domain task-adaptive transfer learning to determine acute ischemic stroke onset time.基于域内任务自适应迁移学习的急性缺血性脑卒中发病时间推断
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2021 Jun;90:101926. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101926. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
7
Factors Influencing Recanalization After Mechanical Thrombectomy With First-Pass Effect for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性缺血性卒中机械取栓首次通过效应后再通的影响因素:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 9;12:628523. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.628523. eCollection 2021.
8
A Machine Learning Approach to First Pass Reperfusion in Mechanical Thrombectomy: Prediction and Feature Analysis.机器学习在机械取栓中首次再灌注的应用:预测和特征分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Jul;30(7):105796. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105796. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
9
Posterior Circulation Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large-Vessel Occlusion: Predictors of Favorable Clinical Outcome and Analysis of First-Pass Effect.后循环血管内血栓切除术治疗大血管闭塞:良好临床结局的预测因素及初次通过效果分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 May;42(5):896-903. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7023. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Good Clinical Outcome Decreases With Number of Retrieval Attempts in Stroke Thrombectomy: Beyond the First-Pass Effect.良好的临床转归随取栓尝试次数增加而降低:不仅仅是首次通过效应。
Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(2):482-490. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029830. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

深度学习在急性缺血性脑卒中患者机械取栓后再通首次通过效果预测中的应用。

A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Recanalization First-Pass Effect following Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

机构信息

From the Computational Diagnostics Lab (H.Z., J.S.P., Z.W., W.F.S., C.W.A.), University of California, Los Angeles, California.

Department of Bioengineering (H.Z., J.S.P., Z.W., C.W.A.), University of California, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug 9;45(8):1044-1052. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8272.

DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A8272
PMID:38871371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11383407/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Following endovascular thrombectomy in patients with large-vessel occlusion stroke, successful recanalization from 1 attempt, known as the first-pass effect, has correlated favorably with long-term outcomes. Pretreatment imaging may contain information that can be used to predict the first-pass effect. Recently, applications of machine learning models have shown promising results in predicting recanalization outcomes, albeit requiring manual segmentation. In this study, we sought to construct completely automated methods using deep learning to predict the first-pass effect from pretreatment CT and MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our models were developed and evaluated using a cohort of 326 patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy at UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center from 2014 to 2021. We designed a hybrid transformer model with nonlocal and cross-attention modules to predict the first-pass effect on MR imaging and CT series.

RESULTS

The proposed method achieved a mean 0.8506 (SD, 0.0712) for cross-validation receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) on MR imaging and 0.8719 (SD, 0.0831) for cross-validation ROC-AUC on CT. When evaluated on the prospective test sets, our proposed model achieved a mean ROC-AUC of 0.7967 (SD, 0.0335) with a mean sensitivity of 0.7286 (SD, 0.1849) and specificity of 0.8462 (SD, 0.1216) for MR imaging and a mean ROC-AUC of 0.8051 (SD, 0.0377) with a mean sensitivity of 0.8615 (SD, 0.1131) and specificity 0.7500 (SD, 0.1054) for CT, respectively, representing the first classification of the first-pass effect from MR imaging alone and the first automated first-pass effect classification method in CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Results illustrate that both nonperfusion MR imaging and CT from admission contain signals that can predict a successful first-pass effect following endovascular thrombectomy using our deep learning methods without requiring time-intensive manual segmentation.

摘要

背景与目的

血管内血栓切除术治疗大动脉闭塞性脑卒中患者后,首次通过效果(即 1 次尝试即可成功再通)与长期预后良好相关。预处理成像中可能包含可用于预测首次通过效果的信息。最近,机器学习模型在预测再通结果方面显示出了有前景的结果,尽管需要手动分割。在这项研究中,我们试图构建完全自动化的方法,使用深度学习从预处理 CT 和 MR 成像预测首次通过效果。

材料与方法

我们的模型是使用 2014 年至 2021 年期间在加州大学洛杉矶分校罗纳德·里根医疗中心接受血管内血栓切除术的 326 名患者的队列进行开发和评估的。我们设计了一个带有非局部和交叉注意模块的混合变压器模型,以预测 MR 成像和 CT 系列上的首次通过效果。

结果

该方法在 MR 成像的交叉验证受试者工作特征曲线(ROC-AUC)上的平均得分为 0.8506(标准差为 0.0712),在 CT 的交叉验证 ROC-AUC 上的平均得分为 0.8719(标准差为 0.0831)。在前瞻性测试集中进行评估时,我们提出的模型的平均 ROC-AUC 为 0.7967(标准差为 0.0335),平均敏感性为 0.7286(标准差为 0.1849)和特异性为 0.8462(标准差为 0.1216)用于 MR 成像,平均 ROC-AUC 为 0.8051(标准差为 0.0377),平均敏感性为 0.8615(标准差为 0.1131)和特异性为 0.7500(标准差为 0.1054),分别代表单独从 MR 成像首次分类首次通过效果和首次自动分类 CT 中的首次通过效果的方法。

结论

结果表明,使用我们的深度学习方法,入院时的非灌注 MR 成像和 CT 都包含可以预测血管内血栓切除术后首次通过效果的信号,而无需耗时的手动分割。